Observational Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2024.
World J Hepatol. Oct 27, 2024; 16(10): 1177-1187
Published online Oct 27, 2024. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v16.i10.1177
Table 1 Baseline sociodemographic and clinical characteristics of the study participants
Variables
Frequency
Percentage (%)
Median with IQR
Age (years)--40.5 (31-54)
SexMale9567.9-
Female4532.1-
History of jaundiceYes4733.6-
No9366.2-
History of alcohol useYes2115-
No11985-
AscitesYes5337.9-
No8762.1-
Cirrhosis classificationCompensated7050-
Decompensated7050-
HBsAgReactive5640-
Non-reactive8460-
HCV AbReactive2316.4
-
Non-reactive11783.6-
Ascites on ultrasoundsYes6042.8-
No7956.4-
Not reported on ultrasound10.7-
EV on endoscopyYesGrade 13227.4-
Grade 24740.2-
Grade 33832.5-
No2316.4-
Stigmata of bleedingYes4330.7-
No8157.8-
Not reported on the endoscopy1611.4-
Table 2 Baseline biochemical and ultrasound findings of the study participants
Variables
Percentage of participants for whom the laboratory tests were done (%)
Median with IQR
AST (IU)97.166 (41-119)
ALT (IU)97.148.5 (32-79.9)
Total bilirubin (mg/dL)86.41.5 (0.89-2.62)
Albumin (g/dL)60.73.78 (3-4.15)
INR37.81.45 (1.25-1.81)
Hemoglobin (g/dL)10013.65 (11.6-15.57)
WBC count (× 10³/mL)1005.0 (3.8-6.575)
Platelet count (× 10³/mL)100104 (73-139)
Creatinine (mg/dL)900.8 (0.6-0.92)
Ultrasound findingsSD (mm)100140 (123-161.75)
Liver size (mm)100140 (130-148)
Portal vein diameter (mm)37.812 (10-14.9)
PC/SD100750.88 (452.2-1099)
Table 3 Comparison of study participants' clinical, biochemical, and ultrasonographic features based on the presence or absence of esophageal varices
Variables
Cirrhosis with varices
Cirrhosis without varices
P value
SexMale65.8%78.3%0.2431
Female64.2%21.7%-
Age41 (31-53)39 (30-55)0.889
AST67 (43.7-121.5)41.5 (31-85.25)0.035
ALT47 (32-79.8)51 (27.5-83)0.96
WBC count5 (3.7-6.55)5.6 (4.5-6.8)0.386
Hemoglobin13.3 (11.25-15.1)15.9 (14-16.4)0.001a
Platelet count94 (68-132)159 (128-207)0.001a
Ultrasound featuresSD (mm)141 (124-168)125 (115-141)0.001a
Liver size (mm)141 (130-148)140 (130-147)0.832
PC/SD693.8 (423.6-1053)1360 (920-1886.9)0.001a
Table 4 The crude and adjusted odds ratio of variables in univariant and multivariate logistic regression
Variable
Crude OR (95%CI)
P value
AOR (95%CI)
P value
PC/SD0.069 (0.025-0.195)< 0.001--
Hemoglobin0.695 (0.551-0.875)0.002--
Platelet count0.129 (0.036-0.56)0.0020.140 (0.037-0.526)0.004a
SD1.037 (10.13-1.061)0.002--
Ascites on ultrasound0.044 (0.006-0.337)0.003--
Stage of cirrhosis14.571 (3.264-65.055)< 0.00112.623 (3.164-67-586)0.001a
Table 5 Predictive accuracy of the best cutoff value of platelet count, spleen diameter, and platelet count-spleen diameter ratio in the diagnosis of esophageal varices
Non-invasive markers
Cut-off value
Sensitivity (%)
Specificity (%)
AUROC (95%CI)
P value
PPV (%)
NPV (%)
Accuracy (%)
Platelet count138000/mL82.0569.570.815 (0.718-0.913)< 0.00193.2043.2480
Spleen diameter120.5 mm83.7647.830.712 (0.605-0.820)0.00189.0936.6777.86
PC/SD1118.7486.3269.570.835 (0.736-0.934)< 0.00193.525083.57
Table 6 Predictive accuracy of the cutoff value of platelet count, spleen diameter, and platelet count-spleen diameter ratio in the diagnosis of compensated cirrhosis
Non-invasive marker
Cut-off value
Sensitivity (%)
Specificity (%)
AUROC (95%CI)
P value
PPV (%)
NPV (%)
Accuracy (%)
Platelet count119500/mL73.4790.480.872 (0.785-0.959)0.001a94.7459.3878.57
Spleen diameter133.5 mm59.1876.190.713 (0.591-0.836)0.00585.2944.4464.29
PC/SD830.369.3995.240.889 (0.805-0.973)0.001a97.1457.1477.14
Table 7 Predictive accuracy of the best cutoff value of spleen diameter and Platelet count-spleen diameter ratio in the diagnosis of large esophageal varices
Non-invasive marker
Cut-off value
Sensitivity (%)
Specificity (%)
AUROC (95%CI)
P value
PPV (%)
NPV (%)
Accuracy (%)
Spleen diameter140.5 mm78.9560.760.695 (0.595-0.795)0.001a49.1885.7166.67
PC/SD696.563.1655.70.595 (0.488-0.702)0.09540.6875.8658.12