Hanafy AS, Basha MAK, Wadea FM. Novel markers of endothelial dysfunction in hepatitis C virus-related cirrhosis: More than a mere prediction of esophageal varices. World J Hepatol 2020; 12(10): 850-862 [PMID: 33200022 DOI: 10.4254/wjh.v12.i10.850]
Corresponding Author of This Article
Amr Shaaban Hanafy, MD, Assistant Professor, Department of Internal Medicine, Gastroenterology and Hepatology Division, Zagazig University Hospital, 40- Elzohour treet, Zagazig 44519, Egypt. amrhanafy@zu.edu.eg
Research Domain of This Article
Gastroenterology & Hepatology
Article-Type of This Article
Observational Study
Open-Access Policy of This Article
This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Table 2 Ultrasonographic and liver stiffness values of the enrolled patients
Variable
Liver cirrhosis with EVs
Liver cirrhosis without EVs
Control group
P value
Splenic diameter
182.9 ± 21.4
141 ± 12.8
111.2 ± 9.7
0.003
Platelets/SD ratio
449 ± 166
1374.9 ± 380
1701 ± 239
0.001
FibroScan (kPa)
24.4 ± 6.02
14.8 ± 1.9
5.2 ± 0.82
0.001
CIMT (mm)
1.2 ± 0.13
0.69 ± 0.14
0.62 ± 0.11
0.001
Table 3 Discriminating ability of the novel markers in the studied groups
Variable
VLDL
CIMT
LDL/platelet ratio
ABI
Cutoff value
Below 16.5
Above 16.5
P value
Below 1.1
Above 1.1
P value
Below 1
Above 1
P value
Below 0.94
Above 0.94
P value
n
76
164
-
96
144
-
98
142
-
70
170
-
Sex (M/F)
56/20
106/58
0.2
64/32
98/46
0.86
66/32
96/46
0.83
47/23
115/55
0.45
Age (yr)
50.3 ± 10
48.5 ± 8.3
0.3
49.6 ± 8.6
48.7 ± 9
0.56
49.8 ± 8.8
48 ± 9
0.78
51.5 ± 8.9
48.2 ± 7.4
0.2
AST (IU/L)
46 ± 11.6
38.4 ± 12.1
0.01
47.5 ± 11.8
34.9 ± 8.4
0.01
52 ± 11
35 ± 9
0.001
49 ± 12
38 ± 11
0.03
ALT (IU/L)
45 ± 8.4
37.5 ± 8.5
0.03
46 ± 8
35.4 ± 7
0.03
45 ± 7.8
34 ± 5.6
0.02
43 ± 8
32 ± 8
0.047
Platelet count × 103
83.6 ± 47
165.5 ± 62.2
0.001
82.5 ± 41.4
182 ± 40
0.001
81 ± 26
188 ± 41
0.001
87 ± 23
160 ± 61
0.001
Total cholesterol
166 ± 21
198 ± 24
0.02
170 ± 18
200.5 ± 26
0.034
168 ± 26
197 ± 28
0.04
173 ± 27
196 ± 25
0.023
Triglycerides (mg/dL)
135.7 ± 15
164 ± 19
0.03
137 ± 15
168 ± 15
0.032
140 ± 19
168 ± 16
0.045
143 ± 18
162 ± 24
0.01
VLDL (mg/dL)
14.6 ± 1.5
26.2 ± 5.6
0.001
17 ± 4.9
28 ± 7
0.001
15 ± 4
32 ± 6
0.001
17 ± 5
25 ± 12
0.03
LDL (mg/dL)
106 ± 15
126 ± 21
0.001
102 ± 13
130 ± 20
0.023
110 ± 17
122 ± 20
0.06
109 ± 19
129 ± 22
0.021
HDL (mg/dL)
40 ± 4
43 ± 8
0.89
39 ± 5
42 ± 8.2
0.45
40 ± 5
42 ± 8
0.82
39 ± 4
42 ± 8
0.34
FIB-4
5.03 ± 1.8
2.2 ± 1.6
0.001
5 ± 2
1.7 ± 0.6
0.001
4.9 ± 1.9
1.6 ± 0.5
0.001
4.2 ± 2
2.4 ± 1.9
0.01
LDL/platelet count ratio
1.5 ± 0.48
0.84 ± 0.3
0.001
1.4 ± 0.4
0.75 ± 0.21
0.001
1.5 ± 0.3
0.7 ± 0.15
0.001
1.24 ± 0.21
0.91 ± 0.34
0.001S
Splenic diameter (mm)
186.3 ± 25.4
141.5 ± 24
0.001
185.4 ± 20
133 ± 17
0.001
181 ± 24
122 ± 11
0.001
171 ± 29
136 ± 13
0.001
Platelets/SD
492.6 ± 76.2
1237.7 ± 502
0.001
463.3 ± 43
1400 ± 410
0.001
471 ± 213
1440 ± 402
0.001
678 ± 298
1173 ± 554
0.001
Table 4 Performance of the novel markers when compared to the traditional tools
Cutoff value
PLT/SD ratio above 872
FIB-4 above 3.25
ABI below 0.94
LDL/PLT ratio above 1
CIMT above 1.1
VLDL below 16.5
P value
n
90
90
70
98
96
76
LS (kPa)
24.4 ± 6.2
26. 5 ± 5.2
22 ± 8.2
23 ± 7
24.6 ± 6.7
25.3 ± 6.3
F = 1.87, P = 0.117
ABI
1.08 ± 0.09
1.09 ± 0.1
0.887 ± 0.04
0.93 ± 0.1
0.88 ± 0.1
0.96 ± 0.08
F = 30, P = 0.001
Endoscopy
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
EVs, n (%)
82/90 (91.1)
56/90 (62.2)
65/70 (92.9)
92/98 (94)
90/96 (93.8)
68/76 (89.5)
P = 0.001
Grade I-II, n (%)
26/32 (81.3)
14/32 (35)
20/32 (62.5)
24/32 (75)
24/32 (75)
10/32 (31.3)
χ2 = 13.3, P = 0.009
Grade III, n (%)
32/42 (76.2)
30/42 (71.4)
30/42 (71.4)
42/42 (100)
40/42 (95)
34/42 (81)
χ2= 7.67, P = 0.104
Grade IV, n (%)
14/16 (87.5)
6/16 (37.5)
9/16 (56.3)
16/16 (100)
16/16 (100)
12/16 (75)
χ2= 9.55, P = 0.048
Fundal varix, n (%)
10/12 (83.3)
6/12 (50)
6/12 (50)
10/12 (83)
10/12 (83)
12/12 (100)
χ2= 3.47,P = 0.48
Citation: Hanafy AS, Basha MAK, Wadea FM. Novel markers of endothelial dysfunction in hepatitis C virus-related cirrhosis: More than a mere prediction of esophageal varices. World J Hepatol 2020; 12(10): 850-862