BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Editorial Open Access
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2026. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.
World J Hepatol. Feb 27, 2026; 18(2): 114551
Published online Feb 27, 2026. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v18.i2.114551
Ginger as a nutraceutical shield: Counteracting acrylamide-induced liver injury
Alberto Massimi, Mara Massimi, Department of Life, Health and Environmental Sciences, University of L’Aquila, L’Aquila 67100, AQ, Italy
ORCID number: Alberto Massimi (0009-0002-5191-7663); Mara Massimi (0000-0002-9569-816X).
Author contributions: Massimi M conceived the overall concept and outline, drafted the manuscript, and supervised the work; Massimi A prepared the figure and the table, and contributed to the discussion and literature review. All authors critically revised the manuscript and approved the final version.
Conflict-of-interest statement: All the authors report no relevant conflicts of interest for this article.
Open Access: This article is an open-access article that was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: https://creativecommons.org/Licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Corresponding author: Mara Massimi, PhD, Associate Professor, Department of Life, Health and Environmental Sciences, University of L’Aquila, Via Vetoio, L’Aquila 67100, AQ, Italy. mara.massimi@univaq.it
Received: September 23, 2025
Revised: October 23, 2025
Accepted: January 4, 2026
Published online: February 27, 2026
Processing time: 143 Days and 2.9 Hours

Abstract

Acrylamide, a contaminant formed during high-temperature cooking of common foods, is increasingly recognized as a silent and underestimated contributor to liver injury. In this editorial, we comment on the study by Nour El Deen et al, demonstrating that a chemically standardized ginger (Zingiber officinale) extract (≥ 20% 6-gingerol) mitigates acrylamide-induced hepatotoxicity in rats through antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, and cytoprotective mechanisms. By combining biochemical, histopathological, and molecular evidence, the authors establish a coherent experimental basis for future translational research. Their results are consistent with a growing body of data supporting the hepatoprotective properties of ginger and emphasize the importance of using standardized nutraceutical preparations in preventive hepatology. From a precision-nutrition perspective, ginger phytocompounds appear to influence key oxidative, inflammatory, and metabolic pathways, possibly involving the gut-liver axis. Confirmatory studies in chronic exposure models and human cohorts, together with compositional and protein-level validation, will be essential to strengthen both the mechanistic and translational significance of these findings.

Key Words: Ginger; Acrylamide exposure; Hepatotoxicity; Oxidative stress; Precision nutraceuticals

Core Tip: Acrylamide, a common food contaminant, contributes to liver injury through oxidative and inflammatory mechanisms. Nour El Deen et al demonstrate that a standardized ginger extract (≥ 20% 6-gingerol) protects against acrylamide-induced hepatotoxicity in rats. The editorial highlights the broader implications of such findings: Standardized nutraceuticals can serve as accessible tools for preventive hepatology. Within a precision-nutrition context, rigorous compositional and molecular validation will be essential to translate these preclinical observations into human relevance.



INTRODUCTION

Since its discovery in staple foods such as fried potatoes and bread in 2002[1], acrylamide has been classified as a probable human carcinogen and a vinyl monomer of global toxicological concern[2]. Recent reviews have highlighted that acrylamide is ubiquitous in cereal-based foods and coffee, with coffee alone representing a significant source of global dietary exposure. In addition, human exposure to acrylamide can also occur through different routes, including contaminated materials, skin contact, and inhalation. The health risks of prolonged exposure have been documented[3]. Short- and medium-term exposures can also be objectively monitored through validated biomarkers, including hemoglobin adducts and urinary mercapturic acids, which strengthen exposure-effect inference[4].

Hepatic metabolism through cytochrome P450 2E1, in both humans and experimental animals, generates glycidamide, a reactive metabolite capable of forming DNA and protein adducts[5]. In the liver, this process initiates a cascade of oxidative stress, lipid peroxidation, and chronic inflammatory signaling, which are likely to play a key role in the carcinogenicity and neurotoxicity of acrylamide[6]. Additional evidence implicates mitochondrial dysfunction, dysregulated autophagy, and gut microbiota disturbance in acrylamide-induced hepatotoxicity[7].

Moreover, dietary exposure impacts multiple organs beyond the liver, including kidneys[8], the gastrointestinal tract[9], the reproductive system[10], and the cardiovascular system[11], underscoring its systemic toxicity. Recent human evidence has also suggested links with extrahepatic outcomes, such as an association between acrylamide/glycidamide exposure and psoriasis[12]. As diets rich in ultra-processed foods remain widespread, acrylamide represents an unavoidable daily exposure and an underestimated contributor to the global burden of chronic disease[13]. The urgency of this issue is reflected in new technological approaches, such as the development of electrochemical biosensors for rapid and sensitive detection of acrylamide in food products[14]. However, such technologies primarily serve surveillance purposes and cannot effectively reduce population exposure, highlighting the need for complementary preventive strategies. Nutraceutical interventions, in particular, offer a biologically grounded means of mitigation through modulation of oxidative and inflammatory pathways.

At the regulatory level, the European Food Safety Authority published in 2015 a scientific opinion on acrylamide in food, concluding that dietary exposure to acrylamide potentially increases the risk of developing cancer in consumers of all age groups[15]. Subsequently, the European Commission adopted Commission Regulation (EU) 2017/2158, which sets mitigation measures and benchmark levels for the reduction of acrylamide in certain foods[16]. In the United States, the Food and Drug Administration issued in 2016 its “Guidance for Industry: Acrylamide in Foods”, which provides non-binding recommendations for manufacturers on practices to reduce acrylamide formation during food processing[17].

At the same time, research is increasingly embracing systems-biology approaches: Transcriptomics and metabolomics are being applied to elucidate the multilevel toxicity of acrylamide. Such approaches underscore that acrylamide toxicity results from interconnected oxidative, inflammatory, and metabolic disturbances, the kind of complexity for which pleiotropic nutraceuticals, such as ginger (Zingiber officinale), are particularly well suited[6,18].

Finally, the concept of “precision nutraceuticals” is gaining traction: Individual variability in enzymes such as cytochrome P450 2E1 may influence toxic susceptibility and response to dietary interventions[19,20]. This perspective aligns with the broader field of personalized nutrition, which highlights genetic and metabolic variability as critical determinants of response to dietary agents[21]. Future studies should also consider advanced formulations (e.g., nanoemulsions or targeted delivery systems) to improve bioavailability and consistency[22,23]. Within this broader precision framework, the gut-liver axis has emerged as a key target, linking diet, microbiota, and hepatic health. Evidence indicates that acrylamide disrupts intestinal homeostasis, whereas ginger phytocompounds can restore microbial balance and reduce endotoxin-driven inflammation[24]. Consistent with this view, studies in humans and animal models have shown that ginger and its main constituents, including 6-gingerol, can modulate gut microbiota composition, promoting beneficial microbial profiles and reducing pro-inflammatory communities[24,25]. Against this mechanistic and translational background, the study by Nour El Deen et al[26] is particularly noteworthy: It not only supports the hepatoprotective potential of standardized ginger extract against acrylamide-induced injury but also exemplifies the broader paradigm of how traditional remedies can be repositioned within molecular hepatology, bridging ancient wisdom and modern precision medicine.

MECHANISTIC PLAUSIBILITY, STRENGTHS AND LIMITATIONS

The study provides coherent biochemical and histological evidence of protection. However, protein-level validation of gene expression and a more detailed phytochemical characterization of the ginger extract would further enhance mechanistic understanding and reproducibility. In this commentary, we therefore expand the discussion by summarizing the main phytochemicals and their molecular targets to contextualize the findings within the broader framework of ginger’s hepatoprotective mechanisms. Occasional editorial inaccuracies, such as a sporadic mention of “acetaminophen” instead of acrylamide, have no material impact on data interpretation.

The biological plausibility of these observations is consistent with existing data on ginger phytochemistry. Gingerols and shogaols are known to activate the nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2 (Nrf2) pathway while inhibiting nuclear factor kappa-light-chain-enhancer of activated B cells (NF-κB)-mediated transcription of pro-inflammatory mediators, thereby reinforcing antioxidant defenses and limiting inflammatory signaling[23,27]. In hepatic models, 6-gingerol attenuates apoptosis during ischemia/reperfusion injury through BCL2-associated X protein/B-cell lymphoma 2 modulation, and zingerone exerts similar cytoprotective effects. Broader reviews also report a reduction in the BCL2-associated X protein/B-cell lymphoma 2 ratio and suppression of apoptotic cascades with ginger extracts[28,29]. These pleiotropic properties help explain ginger’s benefits across diverse models of hepatic injury, including foodborne toxicants such as acrylamide. Additional mechanisms include AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK)-sterol regulatory element-binding protein regulation by 6-gingerol[30], and improved hepatic antioxidant defense and lipid metabolism in high-fat diet-fed mice[31], as well as nucleotide-binding oligomerization domain-like receptor family pyrin domain-containing 3-microbiota modulation by ginger essential oil[24], both relevant to lipid metabolism and inflammation.

Recent omics-based studies further confirm that ginger phytocompounds orchestrate complex gene networks involved in oxidative stress, inflammation, and metabolism, providing a systems-level rationale for hepatoprotection[18,32]. On this basis, it is useful to summarize the major bioactive constituents of Zingiber officinale and their molecular targets (Table 1), as they offer a mechanistic framework that complements the observations by Nour El Deen et al[26].

Table 1 Major bioactive compounds of Zingiber officinale with hepatoprotective effects and their associated signaling mechanisms.
Phytochemical components
Biological effects
Signaling pathways
Ref.
6-gingerolInhibits invasion and metastasis; blocks angiogenesis; induces apoptosis; exhibits hepatoprotective effectNF-кB decrease, STAT3 decrease, MAPK decrease, PI3K/AKT-P21 increase, AMPK increase, BAX increase[33-35]
8-gingerolExhibits antiemetic activity; reduces ROS production; modulates autophagy; inhibits proliferation and migration; induces apoptosisNrf2-HO-1 increase, 5-hydroxytryptamine 3 antagonist; neurokinin-1 antagonist modulates EGFR/STAT/ERK signaling, PI3K/AKT/mTOR and MAPK pathways[33,34,38,39,41,43-45]
10-gingerolReduces cell division and induces S-phase cell cycle arrest and apoptosis; exhibits anti-neuroinflammatory and antioxidant activityAKT decrease, PI3K/p38 MAPK decrease, EGFR increase, NF-кB decrease, AMPK increase, mTOR pathway modulation[34,36,41]
6-shogaolIncreases antioxidant enzyme levels; inhibits tumor invasion; prevents TNF-α-induced barrier lossMMP-9 expression decrease, PI3K/AKT decrease, NF-кB decrease, MAPK decrease, Nrf2 increase[33-35,37]
10-shogaolExhibits anti-inflammatory and anti-cancer activity; reduces lipid accumulationAMPK increase, NF-кB decrease[33,39,41]
ZingeroneExhibits antioxidant and anti-inflammatory effects, antiemetic activity and cytoprotective effectNF-кB decrease, IL-1β decrease, 5-hydroxytryptamine 3 antagonist[33,34,41,44]
Paradols (6-, 8-, 10-)Exhibits anti-proliferative, antioxidant, anti-inflammatory activityPI3K/AKT/mTOR decrease, NF-кB decrease[39,41,44]
Gingerenone AExhibits anti-tumor, pro-apoptotic and anti-inflammatory activityJAK2/STAT3 decrease[33,34,40,41]
β-sesquiphellandreneExhibits antioxidant, antimicrobial and anti-inflammatory activityNF-кB decrease, MAPK decrease[33,41]
GeraniolPromotes autophagy; exhibits antioxidant activityAMPK increase, mTOR decrease[33,34,42]
Phenolic acids (gallic, ferulic, caffeic, ellagic, hydroxybenzoic acid)Scavenges reactive species; modulates inflammation and lipid metabolismNF-кB decrease, PI3K/MAPK decrease, AMPK increase, Nrf2/HO-1 increase[33,41,43]
Minor flavonoids (quercetin, rutin, naringenin)Exhibits antioxidant and anti-inflammatory activityNF-кB decrease, Nrf2 increase[33,41]

Among these, 6-gingerol and 10-gingerol activate the Nrf2/antioxidant response element pathway and attenuate NF-κB/mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) signaling, thereby restoring antioxidant enzyme activity (superoxide dismutase, catalase, glutathione peroxidase) and reducing lipid peroxidation[33,34]. Shogaols, particularly 6-shogaol and 10-shogaol, show enhanced electrophilic and anti-inflammatory activity: 6-shogaol inhibits NF-κB and signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (STAT3) and promotes autophagy-linked cytoprotection[35-38], whereas 10-shogaol activates AMPK with favorable effects on lipid metabolism[39]. Zingerone, paradols, and gingerenone A exert complementary actions via phosphoinositide 3-kinase/protein kinase B, Janus kinase/STAT, and toll-like receptor 4 signaling[33,40,41]. Together, these actions provide a coherent mechanistic rationale for the antioxidant and anti-inflammatory outcomes reported in acrylamide-induced hepatotoxicity.

Sesquiterpenes (β-sesquiphellandrene, β-bisabolene), curcumene, and geraniol further contribute to redox balance and membrane stabilization through NF-κB/MAPK and AMPK modulation[42-44]. Likewise, phenolic acids (ferulic, caffeic, ellagic) and flavonoids (quercetin, kaempferol, naringenin) reinforce the Nrf2 axis and suppress pro-inflammatory transcription[45].

Altogether, the concerted activity across Nrf2, NF-κB, MAPK, phosphoinositide 3-kinase/protein kinase B, Janus kinase/STAT, AMPK, and toll-like receptor 4 cascades underlies the biochemical (malondialdehyde decrease; glutathione/superoxide dismutase increase) and histological protection observed by Nour El Deen et al[26]. As noted above, future studies would benefit from full compositional profiling of the extract (e.g., high-performance liquid chromatography standardization ≥ 20% 6-gingerol) and protein-level confirmation of molecular endpoints to strengthen mechanistic attribution (Table 1).

Beyond preclinical data, the translational implications deserve equal emphasis. Randomized controlled trials in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease have shown improvements in liver enzymes (e.g., alanine aminotransferase) and metabolic indices[46], whereas in patients with type 2 diabetes plus non-alcoholic fatty liver disease the benefits are predominantly metabolic[47]. A recent meta-analysis confirmed that ginger supplementation improves glycemic control and reduces oxidative stress in patients with metabolic disorders, indirectly supporting its hepatoprotective potential[48,49]. Extending this evidence to acrylamide-related liver injury underscores the translational relevance of nutraceutical strategies against dietary contaminants.

The findings of Nour El Deen et al[26] are consistent with earlier reports of ginger’s hepatoprotective role in toxicant- and diet-induced injury, including models of carbon tetrachloride, bromobenzene, and high-fat diets[31,50]. More recently, dose- and age-dependent variations in hepatoprotective efficacy have been described[51]. These findings underscore the need to better define optimal dosing regimens. Notable strengths of the study include the use of a chemically defined extract, the integration of molecular, biochemical, and histological endpoints, and the consistency of results across analyses. In addition, the use of a high-performance liquid chromatography-standardized extract ensures pharmacological reproducibility and represents an important step toward evaluating nutraceuticals with the same rigor applied to pharmaceuticals.

Limitations include the short experimental period, which does not mimic chronic human exposure, and the lack of protein-level validation of gene expression. Apoptotic and autophagic pathways, highly relevant in acrylamide hepatotoxicity, were also not assessed. These gaps underscore the need for multidimensional approaches, including multi-omics and proteomic validation, to map ginger’s hepatoprotective actions more comprehensively[52,53]. In addition, the original paper did not provide a complete phytochemical profile of the extract. Table 1 now summarizes this aspect, listing the major phenolic and terpenoid constituents together with their molecular targets and biological effects. Inclusion of such compositional data in future experimental studies will enhance comparability across laboratories and facilitate translational standardization.

TRANSLATIONAL AND PUBLIC HEALTH IMPLICATIONS

The message for hepatologists and public health professionals is twofold. First, acrylamide exposure is ubiquitous and almost unavoidable[54]; its contribution to liver disease, although often overlooked, warrants greater attention. Second, nutraceuticals such as ginger, when rigorously standardized and evaluated, may offer safe, inexpensive, and accessible means of mitigation, particularly in resource-limited settings[55]. In parallel, dietary strategies may also contribute to lowering acrylamide exposure, such as favoring cooking methods with lower thermal intensity (e.g., boiling or steaming instead of frying) and reducing the intake of ultra-processed foods, which remain a major source of acrylamide in Western diets[15,16]. When combined with standardized nutraceutical interventions, such measures form an integrated and pragmatic prevention framework (Figure 1). Biomarker-guided targeting (e.g., AA-Val/GA-Val hemoglobin adducts) could further identify high-risk individuals for stratified prevention with standardized ginger.

Figure 1
Figure 1 Translational framework for acrylamide exposure and prevention. Acrylamide from common foods can trigger oxidative stress, DNA adducts, inflammation, and mitochondrial dysfunction. Monitoring tools (biosensors, omics, risk stratification) and preventive measures (standardized ginger extract, food-processing mitigation) act as complementary pillars; their integration enables stratified prevention and evidence-based public health. CYP2E1: Cytochrome P450 2E1; Nrf2: Nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2; GSH: Glutathione; SOD: Superoxide dismutase; CAT: Catalase; NF-кB: Nuclear factor kappa-light-chain-enhancer of activated B cells.

It should also be recognized that acrylamide is only one of several foodborne electrophilic toxicants. Related compounds, including acrolein, heterocyclic amines, and advanced glycation end-products, share convergent mechanisms (oxidative stress, mitochondrial dysfunction, cytokine activation) that can be counteracted by the multitarget activity of ginger constituents[33,44]. This broader toxicological relevance increases the potential impact of ginger-based nutraceutical approaches in public health. Framing ginger as a harm-reduction tool rather than a dietary panacea is essential. Modest effects at the individual level can translate into meaningful population-level benefits, particularly when combined with exposure-reduction strategies and targeted interventions for vulnerable groups. Future preventive strategies could also explore combinations of nutraceuticals like ginger with established hepatoprotective agents such as silymarin[56], paving the way to synergistic, food-based pharmacology against unavoidable dietary toxins. From an editorial perspective, the broader lesson is that nutraceuticals can indeed move from traditional remedies to credible tools in hepatology, but only if they are studied with the same standards as those applied to pharmaceuticals. In this context, ginger combines strong safety data, cultural acceptability, and multi-target molecular activity, making it a particularly promising candidate. The path forward lies in chronic exposure models and carefully designed clinical trials. For hepatologists, the key takeaway is clear: The same diet may contain both toxin and protector, risk and remedy.

CONCLUSION

Altogether, the study by Nour El Deen et al[26] illustrates how a nutraceutical long rooted in traditional medicine can be repositioned in modern hepatology through biochemical, histological, and molecular rigor. Innovation lies in turning tradition into reproducible, evidence-based prevention, avoiding both uncritical enthusiasm and premature skepticism. Rigorous reporting, standardization, and long-term safety evaluation will determine whether these promising preclinical findings can translate into meaningful public-health outcomes.

Footnotes

Provenance and peer review: Invited article; Externally peer reviewed.

Peer-review model: Single blind

Specialty type: Gastroenterology and hepatology

Country of origin: Italy

Peer-review report’s classification

Scientific Quality: Grade B, Grade C

Novelty: Grade B, Grade C

Creativity or Innovation: Grade C, Grade C

Scientific Significance: Grade B, Grade C

P-Reviewer: Haider KH, PhD, Professor, Saudi Arabia S-Editor: Hu XY L-Editor: A P-Editor: Xu J

References
1.  Stadler RH, Blank I, Varga N, Robert F, Hau J, Guy PA, Robert MC, Riediker S. Acrylamide from Maillard reaction products. Nature. 2002;419:449-450.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 1195]  [Cited by in RCA: 1096]  [Article Influence: 45.7]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
2.  Friedman M. Chemistry, biochemistry, and safety of acrylamide. A review. J Agric Food Chem. 2003;51:4504-4526.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 795]  [Cited by in RCA: 739]  [Article Influence: 32.1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
3.  Bonilla LF, Sandoval-Aldana A, Daza LD. Acrylamide: An approach to its knowledge and importance for roasted coffee. Food Chem. 2025;466:142247.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in RCA: 2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
4.  Monien BH, Bergau N, Gauch F, Weikert C, Abraham K. Internal exposure to heat-induced food contaminants in omnivores, vegans and strict raw food eaters: biomarkers of exposure to acrylamide (hemoglobin adducts, urinary mercapturic acids) and new insights on its endogenous formation. Arch Toxicol. 2024;98:2889-2905.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 1]  [Cited by in RCA: 4]  [Article Influence: 2.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
5.  Rice JM. The carcinogenicity of acrylamide. Mutat Res. 2005;580:3-20.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 220]  [Cited by in RCA: 203]  [Article Influence: 9.7]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
6.  Zhang L, Yang L, Luo Y, Dong L, Chen F. Acrylamide-Induced Hepatotoxicity Through Oxidative Stress: Mechanisms and Interventions. Antioxid Redox Signal. 2023;38:1122-1137.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in RCA: 36]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
7.  Yan F, Wang L, Zhao L, Wang C, Lu Q, Liu R. Acrylamide in food: Occurrence, metabolism, molecular toxicity mechanism and detoxification by phytochemicals. Food Chem Toxicol. 2023;175:113696.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in RCA: 31]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
8.  Quasmi MN, Kumar D, Jangra A. Effects of dietary acrylamide on kidney and liver health: Molecular mechanisms and pharmacological implications. Toxicol Rep. 2025;14:101859.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in RCA: 3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
9.  Palus K. Dietary Exposure to Acrylamide Has Negative Effects on the Gastrointestinal Tract: A Review. Nutrients. 2024;16:2032.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in RCA: 12]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
10.  Seify M, Abedpour N, Talebi SF, Hazari V, Mehrara M, Koohestanidehaghi Y, Shoorei H, Bhandari RK. Impacts of Acrylamide on testis and spermatozoa. Mol Biol Rep. 2024;51:739.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in RCA: 4]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
11.  Sedik AA, Hassan SA, Gouida MSO, Khalifa E. The impact of Nrf2/HO-1, PD-L1/Bax/Bcl-2 and TNF-α/Il-6 signaling pathways in the ameliorative role of cordycepin against acrylamide-induced cardiac toxicity in rats. Sci Rep. 2025;15:23599.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in RCA: 2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
12.  Ma R, Yang N, Mei H, Zhuang Y, Wang Y, Wang Y, Wang X, Shi Y. Associations of exposure to acrylamide and glycidamide with psoriasis among adults: Findings from a population-based study. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2025;295:118147.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in RCA: 1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
13.  Govindaraju I, Sana M, Chakraborty I, Rahman MH, Biswas R, Mazumder N. Dietary Acrylamide: A Detailed Review on Formation, Detection, Mitigation, and Its Health Impacts. Foods. 2024;13:556.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in RCA: 32]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
14.  Bounegru AV, Bounegru I. Acrylamide in food products and the role of electrochemical biosensors in its detection: a comprehensive review. Anal Methods. 2024;16:2824-2839.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in RCA: 3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
15.  EFSA Panel on Contaminants in the Food Chain (CONTAM). Scientific Opinion on acrylamide in food. EFSA J. 2015;13.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 183]  [Cited by in RCA: 250]  [Article Influence: 22.7]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
16.  European Union  Commission Regulation (EU) 2017/2158 of 20 November 2017 establishing mitigation measures and benchmark levels for the reduction of acrylamide in food (Text with EEA relevance). [cited 3 August 2025]. Available from: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2017/2158/oj.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
17.  U.S. Food and Drug Administration  Guidance for Industry: Acrylamide in foods. [cited 3 August 2025]. Available from: https://www.fda.gov/regulatory-information/search-fda-guidance-documents/guidance-industry-acrylamide-foods.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
18.  Hong MK, Hu LL, Zhang YX, Xu YL, Liu XY, He PK, Jia YH. 6-Gingerol ameliorates sepsis-induced liver injury through the Nrf2 pathway. Int Immunopharmacol. 2020;80:106196.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 23]  [Cited by in RCA: 61]  [Article Influence: 10.2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
19.  Pellè L, Carlsson H, Cipollini M, Bonotti A, Foddis R, Cristaudo A, Romei C, Elisei R, Gemignani F, Törnqvist M, Landi S. The polymorphism rs2480258 within CYP2E1 is associated with different rates of acrylamide metabolism in vivo in humans. Arch Toxicol. 2018;92:2137-2140.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 6]  [Cited by in RCA: 10]  [Article Influence: 1.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
20.  Marković Filipović J, Miler M, Kojić D, Karan J, Ivelja I, Čukuranović Kokoris J, Matavulj M. Effect of Acrylamide Treatment on Cyp2e1 Expression and Redox Status in Rat Hepatocytes. Int J Mol Sci. 2022;23:6062.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in Crossref: 8]  [Cited by in RCA: 9]  [Article Influence: 2.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
21.  Ordovas JM, Ferguson LR, Tai ES, Mathers JC. Personalised nutrition and health. BMJ. 2018;361:bmj.k2173.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 179]  [Cited by in RCA: 259]  [Article Influence: 32.4]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
22.  Chronopoulou L, Massimi M, Giardi MF, Cametti C, Devirgiliis LC, Dentini M, Palocci C. Chitosan-coated PLGA nanoparticles: a sustained drug release strategy for cell cultures. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces. 2013;103:310-317.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 104]  [Cited by in RCA: 116]  [Article Influence: 8.9]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
23.  Alsherbiny MA, Abd-Elsalam WH, El Badawy SA, Taher E, Fares M, Torres A, Chang D, Li CG. Ameliorative and protective effects of ginger and its main constituents against natural, chemical and radiation-induced toxicities: A comprehensive review. Food Chem Toxicol. 2019;123:72-97.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 37]  [Cited by in RCA: 46]  [Article Influence: 6.6]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
24.  Panyod S, Wu WK, Hsieh YC, Tseng YJ, Peng SY, Chen RA, Huang HS, Chen YH, Shen TD, Ho CT, Liu CJ, Chuang HL, Huang CC, Wu MS, Sheen LY. Ginger essential oil prevents NASH progression by blocking the NLRP3 inflammasome and remodeling the gut microbiota-LPS-TLR4 pathway in mice. Nutr Diabetes. 2024;14:65.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in RCA: 9]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
25.  Wang X, Zhang D, Jiang H, Zhang S, Pang X, Gao S, Zhang H, Zhang S, Xiao Q, Chen L, Wang S, Qi D, Li Y. Gut Microbiota Variation With Short-Term Intake of Ginger Juice on Human Health. Front Microbiol. 2020;11:576061.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in Crossref: 5]  [Cited by in RCA: 30]  [Article Influence: 6.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
26.  Nour El Deen AE, Rashed F, Osman A, Khalil Farag O, Abdel Ghany AF, Elsayed AM, Mansour SMA, Mohammed MAA, Taha RS, Basha SAZ, Mohamed MMY, Taha A. Ginger mitigates acrylamide-induced hepatotoxicity through antioxidant and anti-inflammatory mechanisms in rats. World J Hepatol. 2025;17:109807.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in RCA: 1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
27.  Semwal RB, Semwal DK, Combrinck S, Viljoen AM. Gingerols and shogaols: Important nutraceutical principles from ginger. Phytochemistry. 2015;117:554-568.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 342]  [Cited by in RCA: 315]  [Article Influence: 28.6]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
28.  Kucukler S, Darendelioğlu E, Caglayan C, Ayna A, Yıldırım S, Kandemir FM. Zingerone attenuates vancomycin-induced hepatotoxicity in rats through regulation of oxidative stress, inflammation and apoptosis. Life Sci. 2020;259:118382.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 26]  [Cited by in RCA: 57]  [Article Influence: 9.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
29.  Yu Q, Li J, Cui M, Mei C, He Q, Du X. 6-Gingerol attenuates hepatic ischemia/reperfusion injury through regulating MKP5-mediated P38/JNK pathway. Sci Rep. 2024;14:7747.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in RCA: 3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
30.  Liu Y, Li D, Wang S, Peng Z, Tan Q, He Q, Wang J. 6-Gingerol Ameliorates Hepatic Steatosis, Inflammation and Oxidative Stress in High-Fat Diet-Fed Mice through Activating LKB1/AMPK Signaling. Int J Mol Sci. 2023;24:6285.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in RCA: 25]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
31.  Seo SH, Fang F, Kang I. Ginger (Zingiber officinale) Attenuates Obesity and Adipose Tissue Remodeling in High-Fat Diet-Fed C57BL/6 Mice. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18:631.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in Crossref: 27]  [Cited by in RCA: 33]  [Article Influence: 6.6]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
32.  Ovesná J, Slabý O, Toussaint O, Kodícek M, Marsík P, Pouchová V, Vanĕk T. High throughput 'omics' approaches to assess the effects of phytochemicals in human health studies. Br J Nutr. 2008;99 E Suppl 1:ES127-ES134.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 22]  [Cited by in RCA: 18]  [Article Influence: 1.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
33.  Mao QQ, Xu XY, Cao SY, Gan RY, Corke H, Beta T, Li HB. Bioactive Compounds and Bioactivities of Ginger (Zingiber officinale Roscoe). Foods. 2019;8:185.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in Crossref: 446]  [Cited by in RCA: 559]  [Article Influence: 79.9]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
34.  Sharma S, Shukla MK, Sharma KC, Tirath, Kumar L, Anal JMH, Upadhyay SK, Bhattacharyya S, Kumar D. Revisiting the therapeutic potential of gingerols against different pharmacological activities. Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol. 2023;396:633-647.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in Crossref: 26]  [Cited by in RCA: 27]  [Article Influence: 9.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
35.  Weng CJ, Chou CP, Ho CT, Yen GC. Molecular mechanism inhibiting human hepatocarcinoma cell invasion by 6-shogaol and 6-gingerol. Mol Nutr Food Res. 2012;56:1304-1314.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 69]  [Cited by in RCA: 76]  [Article Influence: 5.4]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
36.  Joo JH, Hong SS, Cho YR, Seo DW. 10-Gingerol inhibits proliferation and invasion of MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cells through suppression of Akt and p38MAPK activity. Oncol Rep. 2016;35:779-784.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 44]  [Cited by in RCA: 46]  [Article Influence: 4.2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
37.  Luettig J, Rosenthal R, Lee IM, Krug SM, Schulzke JD. The ginger component 6-shogaol prevents TNF-α-induced barrier loss via inhibition of PI3K/Akt and NF-κB signaling. Mol Nutr Food Res. 2016;60:2576-2586.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 62]  [Cited by in RCA: 68]  [Article Influence: 6.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
38.  Pázmándi K, Szöllősi AG, Fekete T. The "root" causes behind the anti-inflammatory actions of ginger compounds in immune cells. Front Immunol. 2024;15:1400956.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in RCA: 17]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
39.  Preciado-Ortiz ME, Pérez-Jiménez B, Barrera-Gómez P, Rivera-Valdés JJ, Acevedo-Carabantes JA, Vásquez-Reyes S, Tovar AR, Torres N, Torre-Villalvazo I, Martínez-López E. A mixture of ginger phenolic compounds enhances mitochondrial function, activates AMPK, and reduces lipid accumulation in adipocytes. PLoS One. 2025;20:e0326690.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in RCA: 3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
40.  Byun S, Lim S, Mun JY, Kim KH, Ramadhar TR, Farrand L, Shin SH, Thimmegowda NR, Lee HJ, Frank DA, Clardy J, Lee SW, Lee KW. Identification of a Dual Inhibitor of Janus Kinase 2 (JAK2) and p70 Ribosomal S6 Kinase1 (S6K1) Pathways. J Biol Chem. 2015;290:23553-23562.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 12]  [Cited by in RCA: 15]  [Article Influence: 1.4]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
41.  Shaukat MN, Nazir A, Fallico B. Ginger Bioactives: A Comprehensive Review of Health Benefits and Potential Food Applications. Antioxidants (Basel). 2023;12:2015.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in RCA: 36]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
42.  Kim SH, Park EJ, Lee CR, Chun JN, Cho NH, Kim IG, Lee S, Kim TW, Park HH, So I, Jeon JH. Geraniol induces cooperative interaction of apoptosis and autophagy to elicit cell death in PC-3 prostate cancer cells. Int J Oncol. 2012;40:1683-1690.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 7]  [Cited by in RCA: 23]  [Article Influence: 1.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
43.  Tohma H, Gülçin İ, Bursal E, Gören AC, Alwasel SH, Köksal E. Antioxidant activity and phenolic compounds of ginger (Zingiber officinale Rosc.) determined by HPLC-MS/MS. J Food Meas Charact. 2017;11:556-566.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 131]  [Cited by in RCA: 146]  [Article Influence: 14.6]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
44.  Unuofin JO, Masuku NP, Paimo OK, Lebelo SL. Ginger from Farmyard to Town: Nutritional and Pharmacological Applications. Front Pharmacol. 2021;12:779352.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in Crossref: 29]  [Cited by in RCA: 47]  [Article Influence: 9.4]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
45.  Shalaby EA, Shanab SMM, Hafez RM, El-ansary AE. Chemical constituents and biological activities of different extracts from ginger plant (Zingiber officinale). Chem Biol Technol Agric. 2023;10.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]
46.  Rafie R, Hosseini SA, Hajiani E, Saki Malehi A, Mard SA. Effect of Ginger Powder Supplementation in Patients with Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Clin Exp Gastroenterol. 2020;13:35-45.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in Crossref: 16]  [Cited by in RCA: 44]  [Article Influence: 7.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
47.  Ghoreishi PS, Shams M, Nimrouzi M, Zarshenas MM, Lankarani KB, Fallahzadeh Abarghooei E, Talebzadeh M, Hashempur MH. The Effects of Ginger (Zingiber Officinale Roscoe) on Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Randomized Double-Blinded Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial. J Diet Suppl. 2024;21:294-312.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 2]  [Cited by in RCA: 20]  [Article Influence: 6.7]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
48.  Maharlouei N, Tabrizi R, Lankarani KB, Rezaianzadeh A, Akbari M, Kolahdooz F, Rahimi M, Keneshlou F, Asemi Z. The effects of ginger intake on weight loss and metabolic profiles among overweight and obese subjects: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 2019;59:1753-1766.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 60]  [Cited by in RCA: 49]  [Article Influence: 6.1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
49.  Sheikhhossein F, Borazjani M, Jafari A, Askari M, Vataniyan E, Gholami F, Amini MR. Effects of ginger supplementation on biomarkers of oxidative stress: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Clin Nutr ESPEN. 2021;45:111-119.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 6]  [Cited by in RCA: 9]  [Article Influence: 1.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
50.  El-Sharaky AS, Newairy AA, Kamel MA, Eweda SM. Protective effect of ginger extract against bromobenzene-induced hepatotoxicity in male rats. Food Chem Toxicol. 2009;47:1584-1590.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 68]  [Cited by in RCA: 58]  [Article Influence: 3.4]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
51.  Matin M, Wysocki K, Horbańczuk JO, Rossi L, Atanasov AG. Ginger (Zingiber officinale) dietary supplementation in mice regulates liver antioxidant defense systems in a dose- and age-dependent. Front Pharmacol. 2025;16:1597599.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in RCA: 3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
52.  Kralj T, Brouwer KLR, Creek DJ. Analytical and Omics-Based Advances in the Study of Drug-Induced Liver Injury. Toxicol Sci. 2021;183:1-13.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 16]  [Cited by in RCA: 23]  [Article Influence: 4.6]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
53.  Ravindra KC, Vaidya VS, Wang Z, Federspiel JD, Virgen-Slane R, Everley RA, Grove JI, Stephens C, Ocana MF, Robles-Díaz M, Isabel Lucena M, Andrade RJ, Atallah E, Gerbes AL, Weber S, Cortez-Pinto H, Fowell AJ, Hussaini H, Bjornsson ES, Patel J, Stirnimann G, Verma S, Elsharkawy AM, Griffiths WJH, Hyde C, Dear JW, Aithal GP, Ramaiah SK. Tandem mass tag-based quantitative proteomic profiling identifies candidate serum biomarkers of drug-induced liver injury in humans. Nat Commun. 2023;14:1215.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in RCA: 25]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
54.  Bušová M, Bencko V, Kromerová K, Nadjo I, Babjaková J. Occurrence of acrylamide in selected food products. Cent Eur J Public Health. 2020;28:320-324.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 4]  [Cited by in RCA: 13]  [Article Influence: 2.2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
55.  Vrentzos E, Pavlidis G, Korakas E, Kountouri A, Pliouta L, Dimitriadis GD, Lambadiari V. Nutraceutical Strategies for Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Steatotic Liver Disease (MASLD): A Path to Liver Health. Nutrients. 2025;17:1657.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in RCA: 8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
56.  Loguercio C, Festi D. Silybin and the liver: from basic research to clinical practice. World J Gastroenterol. 2011;17:2288-2301.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in CrossRef: 233]  [Cited by in RCA: 254]  [Article Influence: 16.9]  [Reference Citation Analysis (5)]