BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Retrospective Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2026.
World J Hepatol. Jan 27, 2026; 18(1): 111722
Published online Jan 27, 2026. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v18.i1.111722
Figure 1
Figure 1 Diagram showing frequency distribution of modified Charlson comorbidity index in our study.
Figure 2
Figure 2 Distribution of high (orange bars) and low modified Charlson comorbidity index patients (blue bars) across various etiology of liver disease in our study. HCC: Hepatocellular carcinoma; MASH: Metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis; mCCI: Modified Charlson comorbidity index.
Figure 3
Figure 3 Morbidity and 90-day mortality in different classes of modified Charlson comorbidity index. A: Morbidity; B: 90-day mortality. Blue bars: Relative frequency of patients with morbidity and mortality. Orange bars: Non-morbid patients.
Figure 4
Figure 4 Mortality in different groups of preoperative models for end-stage liver disease and modified Charlson comorbidity index category. mCCI: Modified Charlson comorbidity index; MELD: Model for end-stage liver disease.
Figure 5
Figure 5 Box and whisker plots for the combined score [modified Charlson comorbidity index + (preoperative model for end-stage liver disease/10)] in patients with morbidity and 90-day mortality. A: Morbidity; B: 90-day mortality. mCCI: Modified Charlson comorbidity index; MELD: Model for end-stage liver disease.