Copyright
©The Author(s) 2026.
World J Hepatol. Jan 27, 2026; 18(1): 111722
Published online Jan 27, 2026. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v18.i1.111722
Published online Jan 27, 2026. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v18.i1.111722
Figure 1 Diagram showing frequency distribution of modified Charlson comorbidity index in our study.
Figure 2 Distribution of high (orange bars) and low modified Charlson comorbidity index patients (blue bars) across various etiology of liver disease in our study.
HCC: Hepatocellular carcinoma; MASH: Metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis; mCCI: Modified Charlson comorbidity index.
Figure 3 Morbidity and 90-day mortality in different classes of modified Charlson comorbidity index.
A: Morbidity; B: 90-day mortality. Blue bars: Relative frequency of patients with morbidity and mortality. Orange bars: Non-morbid patients.
Figure 4 Mortality in different groups of preoperative models for end-stage liver disease and modified Charlson comorbidity index category.
mCCI: Modified Charlson comorbidity index; MELD: Model for end-stage liver disease.
Figure 5 Box and whisker plots for the combined score [modified Charlson comorbidity index + (preoperative model for end-stage liver disease/10)] in patients with morbidity and 90-day mortality.
A: Morbidity; B: 90-day mortality. mCCI: Modified Charlson comorbidity index; MELD: Model for end-stage liver disease.
- Citation: Rajan G, Sam AF, Rajakumar A, Jothimani D, Rela M. Application of modified Charlson comorbidity index for predicting outcomes following adult living donor liver transplantation. World J Hepatol 2026; 18(1): 111722
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-5182/full/v18/i1/111722.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4254/wjh.v18.i1.111722
