Quarleri J, Delpino MV. Respiratory syncytial virus in cirrhosis: Time to separate data from dogma? World J Hepatol 2026; 18(5): 118665 [DOI: 10.4254/wjh.v18.i5.118665]
Corresponding Author of This Article
Jorge Quarleri, PhD, Principal Investigator, Senior Researcher, Tenured Professor, Instituto de Investigaciones Biomédicas en Retrovirus y Sida, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas, Paraguay 2155, Buenos Aires C1121ABG, Argentina. quarleri@fmed.uba.ar
Research Domain of This Article
Virology
Article-Type of This Article
review-article
Open-Access Policy of This Article
This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Baishideng Publishing Group Inc, 7041 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 160, Pleasanton, CA 94566, USA
Share the Article
Quarleri J, Delpino MV. Respiratory syncytial virus in cirrhosis: Time to separate data from dogma? World J Hepatol 2026; 18(5): 118665 [DOI: 10.4254/wjh.v18.i5.118665]
World J Hepatol. May 27, 2026; 18(5): 118665 Published online May 27, 2026. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v18.i5.118665
Respiratory syncytial virus in cirrhosis: Time to separate data from dogma?
Jorge Quarleri, María Victoria Delpino
Jorge Quarleri, María Victoria Delpino, Instituto de Investigaciones Biomédicas en Retrovirus y Sida, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas, Buenos Aires C1121ABG, Argentina
Author contributions: Quarleri J and Delpino MV contributed to this paper; Quarleri J designed the overall concept and outline of the manuscript; Delpino MV contributed to the discussion and design of the manuscript; Quarleri J and Delpino MV contributed to the writing and editing of the manuscript, and review of the literature.
AI contribution statement: AI technologies (ChatGPT, Grammarly) were used uniquely for drafting, editing language, translation, formatting, and overall polishing of the text. This implies that the design, checking, verification, validation, and execution of scientific content, methods, data collection, data analysis, interpretation of data, and conclusions have been performed by the authors. All AI-assisted content was carefully evaluated, revised, and approved by the authors before submission.
Conflict-of-interest statement: All authors declare that they have no conflict of interest to disclose.
Corresponding author: Jorge Quarleri, PhD, Principal Investigator, Senior Researcher, Tenured Professor, Instituto de Investigaciones Biomédicas en Retrovirus y Sida, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas, Paraguay 2155, Buenos Aires C1121ABG, Argentina. quarleri@fmed.uba.ar
Received: January 8, 2026 Revised: January 16, 2026 Accepted: February 6, 2026 Published online: May 27, 2026 Processing time: 138 Days and 15.3 Hours
Core Tip
Core Tip: Although cirrhosis is frequently categorized as a high-risk condition for respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) infection in adults, direct evidence supporting this classification remains limited. Recent real-world data indicate that RSV-related hospitalizations among patients with cirrhosis are uncommon and not independently associated with increased mortality, in contrast to the well-established risk observed in cardiopulmonary and renal diseases. Consequently, current RSV vaccination recommendations for individuals with cirrhosis rely largely on extrapolation rather than robust cirrhosis-specific evidence. Until stronger data become available, RSV vaccination in cirrhosis should be individualized, considering age and co-morbidities, while prioritizing multicenter studies to better define true risk and clinical benefit.
