Copyright
©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Stem Cells. Aug 26, 2025; 17(8): 108898
Published online Aug 26, 2025. doi: 10.4252/wjsc.v17.i8.108898
Published online Aug 26, 2025. doi: 10.4252/wjsc.v17.i8.108898
Table 1 Characteristics and methodology for the formation of glioblastoma tumor model (spheroids or cells)
Ref. | Tumor model (method) | Cell number | Cell type | Cell/stem cell | Fluorescent expressed | Culture medium | Supplements | Culture time (days) |
Van De Looverbosch et al[33], 2025 | Suspension cells | 1000 and 2000 | Patient-derived | GSCs (LBT037-EGFP) | EGFP | Neurocult medium | bFGF, EGF, heparin, and anti-anti | NR |
Ferreira et al[34], 2024 | Suspension cells | 100000 | Lineage | U343MG | GFP | DMEM | Anti-anti and FBS | NR |
LN18 | ||||||||
Pedrosa et al[25], 2023 | Spheres (grow up as tumor spheres in non-laminin coated plate) | NR | Patient-derived | Proneural (GIC7) | GFP | DMEM/F12 | EGF, bFGF, glucose, N2, glutamine, BSA, and HEPES | NR |
Mesenchymal (PG88) | ||||||||
Fedorova et al[35], 2023 | Spheres (poly-HEMA-treated ULA V-bottom 96-well plate + centrifuged (200 g/2 minute) | 2000 | Lineage | U87MG | GFP and tdTomato | DMEM/F12 | Glutamax, NEAA, PS, and FBS | 1 |
Bassot et al[36], 2023 | Suspension cells | NR | Patient-derived | Classical GSC (Ge904) | Non-labeled | DMEM-high | Glucose, Glutamax, PS, and FBS | NR |
Goranci-Buzhala et al[37], 2021 | Suspension cells | 1000 | Patient-derived | GSCs (U3047MG (OPC-like) | mCherry | Neurocult NS-A | EGF, bFGF, N2, L-glutamine, B27 without vitamin A, heparin, and BSA | NR |
GSCs (U3024MG (MES-like) | ||||||||
Azzarelli et al[14], 2021 | Suspension cells | 10000 or 50000 | Patient-derived | GSCs (GCGR-E27 and GCGR-E35) | H2B-GFP | D8437 | EGF, bFGF, N2, Glutamax, B27, PS, and laminin | NR |
Krieger et al[38], 2020 | Suspension cells | 1000 | Patient-derived | 4 patient-derived cell lines | GFP | Neurobasal medium | EGF, bFGF, L-glutamine, B27, and heparin | 7-21 |
Goranci-Buzhala et al[23], 2020 | Spheres (ULA U-bottom 96-well plate) | 1000 | Patient-derived | GSCs primary lines (U3047MG, U3024MG, 450) | mCherry | Neurocult NS-A | EGF, bFGF, N2, L-glutamin, B27 without vitamin A, heparin, and BSA | 2 |
GSCs recurrent lines (275-BIS) | GFP | |||||||
Linkous et al[24], 2019 | Suspension cells | 10000 | Patient-derived | GSCs | GFP | Neurobasal medium | bFGF, sodium, N2, B27, L-glutamine, and heparin | NR |
RFP-827 |
Table 2 Characteristics of neural organoid models
Ref. | Cell/stem cell | iPSCs source | Cell number | NOs age (days) | Assessment size | Characterization1 |
Van De Looverbosch et al[33] | hiPSCs (iPSC0028) | Epithelium | 10000 | 30 | 1077 ± 272 μm | NR |
Ferreira et al[34] | hiPSCs (F9048) | Skin fibroblasts | 10000 | 40 | NR | SOX2, TUJ1, DCX |
Pedrosa et al[25] | hiPSCs (BJiPSC-SV4F-9) | Skin fibroblasts | NR | 41 | NR | SOX2, TUJ1, GFAP, O4 |
Fedorova et al[35] | hiPSCs (MUNIi008-A) | Skin fibroblasts | 2000-3000 | 55 | NR | PAX6, TUJ1, DCX, MAP2, BRN2, SYN1 |
hiPSCs (MUNIi009-A) | ||||||
hiPSCs (MUNIi010-A) | ||||||
Bassot et al[36] | hiPSCs + hESCs (HS420) | Fetal skin fibroblasts + Blastocyst | 1000 | 40 | NR | TUJ1, MAP2, NeuN, GFAP, S100β, OLIG2 |
Goranci-Buzhala et al[37] | hiPSCs (IMR90) | Fetal lung fibroblast | 35000 | 10 | NR | NR |
Azzarelli et al[14] | hiPSCs (IMR90) | Fetal lung fibroblast | 9000 | 42 | NR | SOX2, N-cadherin, PAX6, TUJ1, TBR1 |
Krieger et al[38] | hiPSCs (409b2) | Skin fibroblasts | 1000 | 24 | 500-900 μm | PAX6, TUJ1 |
Goranci-Buzhala et al[23] | hiPSC (IMR90) + GSCs | Fetal lung fibroblast | 35000 (hiPSC) + 1000 (GSC) | 20, 40 and 60 | 500-700 μm | MAP2, SYN1 |
35000 (hiPSC) + 5000 (GSC) | ||||||
Linkous et al[24] | hESCs (WA01 and WA09) | Blastocyst | 9000 | NR | NR | Nestin, musashi-1, SOX2, PAX6 and TBR2 |
hiPSCs (H6) | NR |
Table 3 Neural organoids differentiation protocols
Ref. | Protocol | NOs phases | Plate | Medium | Supplements | Factors | ECM used | Time of each phase |
Van De Looverbosch et al[33] | N/A | 2D hiPSCs neural induction | N/A | Neurobasal + DMEM/F12 + Glutamax | Glutamax, MEM-NEAA, sodium pyruvate, 2-ME, human insulin, N2s, B27s, PS | LDN-193189 and SB-431542 | - | 11 days |
2D NPCs maturation | N/A | Neurobasal + DMEM/F12 + Glutamax | Glutamax, MEM-NEAA, sodium pyruvate, 2-ME, human insulin, N2s, B27s, PS | - | - | 19 days | ||
Organoid production | U-bottom 96-well1 | - | - | - | - | 7 days | ||
Ferreira et al[34] | Unguided | EB formation | ULA U-bottom 96-well | mTeSR 1 | Normocin | ROCKi | - | Not clear |
Neural induction | ULA U-bottom 96-well | DMEM/F12 | Knockout serum replacement, MEM-NEAA, Glutamax, 2-ME | ROCKi and bFGF | - | Until EBs reached 400-600 μm | ||
Neural induction | ULA 24-well | DMEM/F12 | N2s, MEM-NEAA, heparin | - | - | Until neuroepithelium cues appeared | ||
ECM embedding | ULA 6-well | Neurobasal + DMEM/F12 | N2s, B27s without vitamin A, MEM-NEAA, Glutamax, 2-ME, human insulin, Normocin | - | Matrigel | 4 days | ||
Neural differentiation/maturation | ULA 6-well on orbital shaker | Neurobasal + DMEM/F12 | N2s, B27s with vitamin A, MEM-NEAA, Glutamax, 2-ME, human insulin, Normocin | - | - | Up to use in co-cultures (> 40 days) | ||
Pedrosa et al[25] | Guided | EB formation/neural induction | ULA V-shaped 96-well | DMEM/F12 | KnockOut serum, MEM-NEAA, Glutamax, 2-ME, PS | ROCKi, DM and, SB-431542 | - | 7 days |
Neural differentiation | 96-well | Neurobasal-A | B27 supplement without vitamin A, Glutamax, and PS | bFGF and EGF | - | 14 days | ||
Neural differentiation | ULA 6-well | Neurobasal-A | B27s without vitamin A, Glutamax, and PS | bFGF, EGF, BDNF and, NT-3 | - | 21 days | ||
Neural maturation | ULA 6-well | Neurobasal-A | B27s without vitamin A, Glutamax, and PS | - | - | Up to use in co-cultures (> 42 days) | ||
Fedorova et al[35] | Unguided | EB formation | V-bottom 96-well2 | mTeSR 1 | - | ROCKi | - | Until EB were at least 400 μm in diameter |
Neural induction | ULA 24-well | DMEM/F12 | N2s, Glutamax, MEM-NEAA and, heparin | - | - | 6 days | ||
ECM embedding | 6 cm dish | Neurobasal + DMEM/F12 | Glutamax, MEM-NEAA, N2s, human insulin, 2-ME, B27s without vitamin A and, PS | - | Geltrex | 4 days | ||
Neural differentiation/maturation | Spinning bioreactor | Neurobasal + DMEM/F12 | Glutamax, MEM-NEAA, N2s, human insulin, 2-ME, B27s with vitamin A and, PS | - | - | Up to use in co-cultures | ||
Bassot et al[36] | Guided | EB formation | Microwell plate | Serum-free medium | - | ROCKi | - | 12-36 hours |
Neural induction | 6-well on orbital shaker | Neurobasal + DMEM/F12 + Glutamax | B27s and MEM-NEAA | TGFβ/activin/Nodali and BMPi | - | 4 days | ||
Neural differentiation | 6-well on orbital shaker | Neurobasal + DMEM/F12 + Glutamax | - | EGF, bFGF, BMPi, GDNF, BDNF and iγ-secretase | - | 17 days | ||
Neural maturation | PTFE membrane 6-well without agitation | Neurobasal + DMEM/F12 + Glutamax | - | GDNF, BDNF and iγ-secretase | - | Up to use in co-cultures | ||
Goranci-Buzhala et al[37] | Guided | EB formation/neural induction | ULA 96-well | NIM | - | ROCKi | 5 days | |
ECM embedding | NR | Neurobasal + DMEM/F12 | N2s, B27s without vitamin A, 2-ME, human insulin, L-glutamin and, MEM-NEAA | - | Matrigel | 4 days | ||
Neural differentiation/maturation | Spinner flask | Neurobasal + DMEM/F12 | N2s, B27s without vitamin A, 2-ME, human insulin, L-glutamin, MEM-NEAA | DM; SB-431542 | - | Up to use in co-cultures (> 10 days) | ||
Azzarelli et al[14] | Unguided | EB formation | ULA 96-well | EB-media (basal 1 plus supplement A) | - | ROCKi | 5 days | |
Neural induction | ULA 24-well | NIM (basal 1 plus supplement B) | - | - | - | 2 days | ||
ECM embedding | 6 cm dish | Expansion media (basal 2 plus supplement C and D) | - | - | Matrigel | 3 days | ||
Neural differentiation/maturation | 6 cm dishes on orbital shaker | Maturation medium (basal 2 plus supplement E) | Matrigel dissolved in the medium | - | - | Up to use in co-cultures (> 10 days) | ||
Krieger et al[38] | Unguided | EB formation/neural induction | AggreWell | NIM | - | ROCKi | - | 5 days |
ECM embedding | NR | Neurobasal + DMEM/F12 + Glutamax | 1:1 mixture of (N2s, human insulin, L-glutamine, MEM-NEAA, 2-ME): B27s, L-glutamine and, PS | - | Matrigel | Not clear | ||
Neural differentiation/maturation | NR | Neurobasal + DMEM/F12 + Glutamax | 1:1 mixture of (N2s, human insulin, L-glutamine, MEM-NEAA, 2-ME): B27s, L-glutamine and, PS | - | - | Up to use in co-cultures | ||
Goranci-Buzhala et al[23] | Guided | EB formation/neural induction | ULA 96-well | NIM | - | ROCKi | - | 5 days |
ECM embedding | NR | Neurobasal + DMEM/F12 | N2s, B27s without vitamin A, 2-ME, human insulin, L-glutamin, MEM-NEAA | - | Matrigel | 4 days | ||
Neural differentiation/maturation | Spinner flask | Neurobasal + DMEM/F12 | N2s, B27s without vitamin A, 2-ME, human insulin, L-glutamin, MEM-NEAA | DM and SB-431542 | - | Up to use in co-cultures (> 10 days) | ||
Linkous et al[24] | Unguided | EB formation/neural induction | LA 96-well | NIM | - | ROCKi | - | 6-7 days |
Rosettes formation | Matrigel-coated 6-well | NIM | - | - | - | 11-14 days | ||
ECM embedding | NR | Neurobasal + DMEM/F12 | N2s, B27s without vitamin A, 2-ME, human insulin, Glutamax, MEM-NEAA | - | Matrigel | 4 days | ||
Neural differentiation/maturation | Spinning bioreactor or orbital shaker | Neurobasal + DMEM/F12 | N2s, B27s with vitamin A, 2-ME, human insulin, Glutamax and, MEM-NEAA | - | - | Up to use in co-cultures (> 25 days) |
Table 4 Analysis of the invasion of glioblastoma model into neural organoids
Ref. | Co-culture method | Co-culture time (days) | Groups evaluated | Invasion analysis method | Invasion analysis results | General purpose |
Van De Looverbosch et al[33] | GSCs cells were plated onto the NOs | 13 | 1000 GSCs | Fluorescence images and computing mapping (with clearing) | For both samples, most isolated GSCs were found dispersed between 25 and 200 μm from their surface | To demonstrate the value of computing mapping based on deep learning for counting cells in spheroids, identifying differentially labeled subpopulations in spheroids, and mapping the invasion of GBM cells into NOs |
2000 GSCs | ||||||
Ferreira et al[34] | GBM cells were plated onto the NOs ULA 6-well plates with shaker (65 rpm) | 14 | Mock group (7 and 14 days) | Confocal fluorescence images and flow cytometry | Significant reduction in tumor cell proportion on ZIKV group and all CNS tumor cell lines reached the inner regions of the NOs after two weeks | To establish a co-culture model of human NOs with cancer cells from various CNS tumors and utilize these assemblies to investigate the oncolytic effects of ZIKV |
ZIKV infection group (20000 PFU) (7 and 14 days) | ||||||
Pedrosa et al[25] | GBM cells or spheroids were plated onto the NOs | 41 | 2000 GBM cells | Confocal fluorescence images and phase-contrast images | GFP-GICs started to integrate 24 hours after co-culture began. By 15 days, GFP-GIC7 and GFP-PG88 attached to and entered the Nos. By 41 days, both had successfully invaded and multiplied inside the NOs | To evaluate 5-ALA-mediated PDT for GBM treatment, aiming to eliminate infiltrating tumor cells while preserving normal tissue using GBM-initiating cells (GIC7 and PG88) in NOs |
2 tumor spheres | ||||||
Fedorova et al[35] | GBM spheroids were placed on top of NOs (inclined at 45°) | 30, 60, and 90 | Inclined plane | Confocal fluorescence images (with clearing) | GBM migration into NOs increases over time. Migration distance and cell number are significantly higher at 60 and 90 days, with the highest number of migrating cells at 60 days. Matrigel and Geltrex increased GBM cell migration to NOs compared to the system without ECM. Matrigel showed a higher number of cells distant from the GBM/NOs border compared to Geltrex | To propose a GLICO model to study GBM growth and migration in NOs, highlighting the impact of ECM proteins |
GBM spheroids were placed of NOs embedded in a droplet of Matrigel or Geltrex in a ULA dishes with orbital shaker (0.035 g) | Matrigel | |||||
Geltrex | ||||||
Bassot et al[36] | GSCs cells were plated onto the NOs | 5 | Control (miR-ctrl) | Immunofluorescence and confocal imagens | Observed invasion of the GSCs into the NOs in the miR-Ctrl condition and a stronger signal for Ki-67 in the invasive single cells distant from their primary site, indicating that miRNAs can penetrate the NOs and affect GBM invasive capacity | To identify miR-17-3p, miR-222, and miR-340 as key regulators of GBM aggressiveness. Their combined modulation inhibits tumor growth, induces cell death, and shows therapeutic potential in GBM models |
Transfected (miR-17-3p, miR-222, miR-340) | ||||||
Goranci-Buzhala et al[37] | GSCs cells were plated onto the NOs in a ULA-Lumox dish | 20 | Nek2-KD protein expressed with DOX | Immunofluorescence and confocal imagens (with clearing) | Nek2-KD-expressing GSCs failed to enter brain organoids. Naive cells diffused and recapitulated the known characteristics of invading GSCs, such as establishing protrusion-like processes in the form of microtubes. Nek2-KD-expressing U3047MG cells exhibited impaired invasion and failed to grow in NOs | To explore how GSCs suppress ciliogenesis to maintain self-renewal and tumor progression. Restoring cilia formation induces GSC differentiation, reducing tumor infiltration. The study suggests cilium induction as a potential therapy for GBM |
Naíve (control) | ||||||
Azzarelli et al[14] | GSCs cells were plated in ULA 96-well plate onto NOs 6 cm dishes | 7 | 10000 cells | Confocal fluorescence images | On low density, the GSCs group shows some individual cells dispersed sparsely across NOs, the invasion by interconnected streams was more prominent in high-density GSCs group. The behavior of the two cell lines was comparable (genetic profile, classified as RTKI and present PDGFRα amplification) | Followed the behavior of two different cell lines in the GOC system and found that GSCs with similar genetic alterations exhibit comparable behaviors upon organoid engraftment |
50000 cells | ||||||
Krieger et al[38] | GBM cells were plated onto the NOs in a GravityTRAP-ULA + centrifuged (100 g per 3 minutes) | 2 | Patient F2 | Immunohistochemistry and confocal images (with clearing) | To similar NOs size, the fraction of NOs volume taken up by tumor cells was similar across the 4 patient-derived cell lines, with similar sizes. Tumor cells spread widely in all cases. Invasion depths exceeded 100 μm in the majority, with some cells detected at 300 μm from the surface. Cells from patients F6 and F9 were less invasive than cells from F2 and F3 | To investigate GBM invasion in a human-derived model using NOs as a scaffold. This model provides a clinically relevant platform for studying GBM |
Patient F3 | ||||||
Patient F6 | ||||||
Patient F9 | ||||||
Goranci-Buzhala et al[23] | GSCs spheres were plated onto the NOs | 3-10 | 20 days-old organoids | Fluorescence (with clearing) and time-lapse images | GSCs integrated faster into older organoids, suggesting that mature NOs create a favorable environment for GSC growth, likely driven by neuronal activity and factors like NLGN3. Additionally, differences in invasive patterns were shown between primary and recurrent GSCs | To establish three different methods to assess GSC invasion in NOs and develop imaging techniques to validate organoids as reliable models. The assays reveal GSC affinities for organoids at different stages and capture key invasion aspects |
40 days-old organoids | ||||||
60 days-old organoids | ||||||
Linkous et al[24] | GSCs cells were plated in 24-well plate onto NOs with shaker | 14 | Control group | Fluorescence (with clearing), luciferase activity and histopathological | GSC-827 exhibited infiltrative edges with tumor cells invading normal NOs, while GSC-923 showed a diffuse invasion pattern, resembling GBM patient samples. Both cell types (827 and 923) formed a network of tumor microtubes that facilitated infiltration into NOs | To train GLICO models for high throughput drug screening |
TMZ group | ||||||
BCNU group | ||||||
Ionizing radiation (0, 5 and 10 Gy) |
- Citation: Alves ADH, Ennes do Valle NM, Yokota-Moreno BY, Galanciak MCDS, Felix da Silva K, Mamani JB, Sertie AL, de Oliveira FA, Nucci MP, Gamarra LF. Stem cell-derived neural organoids as platforms to investigate glioblastoma invasion and migration: A systematic review. World J Stem Cells 2025; 17(8): 108898
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-0210/full/v17/i8/108898.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4252/wjsc.v17.i8.108898