Systematic Reviews
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Stem Cells. Aug 26, 2025; 17(8): 108898
Published online Aug 26, 2025. doi: 10.4252/wjsc.v17.i8.108898
Table 1 Characteristics and methodology for the formation of glioblastoma tumor model (spheroids or cells)
Ref.
Tumor model (method)
Cell number
Cell type
Cell/stem cell
Fluorescent expressed
Culture medium
Supplements
Culture time (days)
Van De Looverbosch et al[33], 2025Suspension cells1000 and 2000Patient-derivedGSCs (LBT037-EGFP)EGFPNeurocult mediumbFGF, EGF, heparin, and anti-antiNR
Ferreira et al[34], 2024Suspension cells100000LineageU343MGGFPDMEMAnti-anti and FBSNR
LN18
Pedrosa et al[25], 2023Spheres (grow up as tumor spheres in non-laminin coated plate)NRPatient-derivedProneural (GIC7)GFPDMEM/F12EGF, bFGF, glucose, N2, glutamine, BSA, and HEPESNR
Mesenchymal (PG88)
Fedorova et al[35], 2023Spheres (poly-HEMA-treated ULA V-bottom 96-well plate + centrifuged (200 g/2 minute)2000LineageU87MGGFP and tdTomatoDMEM/F12Glutamax, NEAA, PS, and FBS1
Bassot et al[36], 2023Suspension cellsNRPatient-derivedClassical GSC (Ge904)Non-labeledDMEM-highGlucose, Glutamax, PS, and FBSNR
Goranci-Buzhala et al[37], 2021Suspension cells1000Patient-derivedGSCs (U3047MG (OPC-like)mCherryNeurocult NS-AEGF, bFGF, N2, L-glutamine, B27 without vitamin A, heparin, and BSANR
GSCs (U3024MG (MES-like)
Azzarelli et al[14], 2021Suspension cells10000 or 50000Patient-derivedGSCs (GCGR-E27 and GCGR-E35)H2B-GFPD8437EGF, bFGF, N2, Glutamax, B27, PS, and lamininNR
Krieger et al[38], 2020Suspension cells1000Patient-derived4 patient-derived cell linesGFPNeurobasal mediumEGF, bFGF, L-glutamine, B27, and heparin7-21
Goranci-Buzhala et al[23], 2020Spheres (ULA U-bottom 96-well plate)1000Patient-derivedGSCs primary lines (U3047MG, U3024MG, 450)mCherryNeurocult NS-AEGF, bFGF, N2, L-glutamin, B27 without vitamin A, heparin, and BSA2
GSCs recurrent lines (275-BIS)GFP
Linkous et al[24], 2019Suspension cells10000Patient-derivedGSCsGFPNeurobasal mediumbFGF, sodium, N2, B27, L-glutamine, and heparinNR
RFP-827
Table 2 Characteristics of neural organoid models
Ref.
Cell/stem cell
iPSCs source
Cell number
NOs age (days)
Assessment size
Characterization1
Van De Looverbosch et al[33]hiPSCs (iPSC0028)Epithelium10000301077 ± 272 μmNR
Ferreira et al[34]hiPSCs (F9048)Skin fibroblasts1000040NRSOX2, TUJ1, DCX
Pedrosa et al[25]hiPSCs (BJiPSC-SV4F-9)Skin fibroblastsNR41NRSOX2, TUJ1, GFAP, O4
Fedorova et al[35]hiPSCs (MUNIi008-A)Skin fibroblasts2000-300055NRPAX6, TUJ1, DCX, MAP2, BRN2, SYN1
hiPSCs (MUNIi009-A)
hiPSCs (MUNIi010-A)
Bassot et al[36]hiPSCs + hESCs (HS420)Fetal skin fibroblasts + Blastocyst100040NRTUJ1, MAP2, NeuN, GFAP, S100β, OLIG2
Goranci-Buzhala et al[37]hiPSCs (IMR90)Fetal lung fibroblast3500010NRNR
Azzarelli et al[14]hiPSCs (IMR90)Fetal lung fibroblast900042NRSOX2, N-cadherin, PAX6, TUJ1, TBR1
Krieger et al[38]hiPSCs (409b2)Skin fibroblasts100024500-900 μmPAX6, TUJ1
Goranci-Buzhala et al[23]hiPSC (IMR90) + GSCsFetal lung fibroblast35000 (hiPSC) + 1000 (GSC)20, 40 and 60500-700 μmMAP2, SYN1
35000 (hiPSC) + 5000 (GSC)
Linkous et al[24]hESCs (WA01 and WA09)Blastocyst9000NRNRNestin, musashi-1, SOX2, PAX6 and TBR2
hiPSCs (H6)NR
Table 3 Neural organoids differentiation protocols
Ref.
Protocol
NOs phases
Plate
Medium
Supplements
Factors
ECM used
Time of each phase
Van De Looverbosch et al[33]N/A2D hiPSCs neural inductionN/ANeurobasal + DMEM/F12 + GlutamaxGlutamax, MEM-NEAA, sodium pyruvate, 2-ME, human insulin, N2s, B27s, PSLDN-193189 and SB-431542-11 days
2D NPCs maturationN/ANeurobasal + DMEM/F12 + GlutamaxGlutamax, MEM-NEAA, sodium pyruvate, 2-ME, human insulin, N2s, B27s, PS--19 days
Organoid productionU-bottom 96-well1----7 days
Ferreira et al[34]UnguidedEB formationULA U-bottom 96-wellmTeSR 1NormocinROCKi-Not clear
Neural inductionULA U-bottom 96-wellDMEM/F12Knockout serum replacement, MEM-NEAA, Glutamax, 2-MEROCKi and bFGF-Until EBs reached 400-600 μm
Neural inductionULA 24-wellDMEM/F12N2s, MEM-NEAA, heparin--Until neuroepithelium cues appeared
ECM embeddingULA 6-wellNeurobasal + DMEM/F12N2s, B27s without vitamin A, MEM-NEAA, Glutamax, 2-ME, human insulin, Normocin-Matrigel4 days
Neural differentiation/maturationULA 6-well on orbital shakerNeurobasal + DMEM/F12N2s, B27s with vitamin A, MEM-NEAA, Glutamax, 2-ME, human insulin, Normocin--Up to use in co-cultures (> 40 days)
Pedrosa et al[25]GuidedEB formation/neural inductionULA V-shaped 96-wellDMEM/F12KnockOut serum, MEM-NEAA, Glutamax, 2-ME, PSROCKi, DM and, SB-431542-7 days
Neural differentiation96-wellNeurobasal-AB27 supplement without vitamin A, Glutamax, and PSbFGF and EGF-14 days
Neural differentiationULA 6-wellNeurobasal-AB27s without vitamin A, Glutamax, and PSbFGF, EGF, BDNF and, NT-3-21 days
Neural maturationULA 6-wellNeurobasal-AB27s without vitamin A, Glutamax, and PS--Up to use in co-cultures (> 42 days)
Fedorova et al[35]UnguidedEB formationV-bottom 96-well2mTeSR 1-ROCKi-Until EB were at least 400 μm in diameter
Neural inductionULA 24-wellDMEM/F12N2s, Glutamax, MEM-NEAA and, heparin--6 days
ECM embedding6 cm dishNeurobasal + DMEM/F12Glutamax, MEM-NEAA, N2s, human insulin, 2-ME, B27s without vitamin A and, PS-Geltrex4 days
Neural differentiation/maturationSpinning bioreactorNeurobasal + DMEM/F12Glutamax, MEM-NEAA, N2s, human insulin, 2-ME, B27s with vitamin A and, PS--Up to use in co-cultures
Bassot et al[36]GuidedEB formationMicrowell plateSerum-free medium-ROCKi-12-36 hours
Neural induction6-well on orbital shakerNeurobasal + DMEM/F12 + GlutamaxB27s and MEM-NEAATGFβ/activin/Nodali and BMPi-4 days
Neural differentiation6-well on orbital shakerNeurobasal + DMEM/F12 + Glutamax-EGF, bFGF, BMPi, GDNF, BDNF and iγ-secretase-17 days
Neural maturationPTFE membrane 6-well without agitationNeurobasal + DMEM/F12 + Glutamax-GDNF, BDNF and iγ-secretase-Up to use in co-cultures
Goranci-Buzhala et al[37]GuidedEB formation/neural inductionULA 96-wellNIM-ROCKi5 days
ECM embeddingNRNeurobasal + DMEM/F12N2s, B27s without vitamin A, 2-ME, human insulin, L-glutamin and, MEM-NEAA-Matrigel4 days
Neural differentiation/maturationSpinner flaskNeurobasal + DMEM/F12N2s, B27s without vitamin A, 2-ME, human insulin, L-glutamin, MEM-NEAADM; SB-431542-Up to use in co-cultures (> 10 days)
Azzarelli et al[14]UnguidedEB formationULA 96-wellEB-media (basal 1 plus supplement A)-ROCKi5 days
Neural inductionULA 24-wellNIM (basal 1 plus supplement B)---2 days
ECM embedding6 cm dishExpansion media (basal 2 plus supplement C and D)--Matrigel3 days
Neural differentiation/maturation6 cm dishes on orbital shakerMaturation medium (basal 2 plus supplement E)Matrigel dissolved in the medium--Up to use in co-cultures (> 10 days)
Krieger et al[38]UnguidedEB formation/neural inductionAggreWellNIM-ROCKi-5 days
ECM embeddingNRNeurobasal + DMEM/F12 + Glutamax1:1 mixture of (N2s, human insulin, L-glutamine, MEM-NEAA, 2-ME): B27s, L-glutamine and, PS-
MatrigelNot clear
Neural differentiation/maturationNRNeurobasal + DMEM/F12 + Glutamax1:1 mixture of (N2s, human insulin, L-glutamine, MEM-NEAA, 2-ME): B27s, L-glutamine and, PS--Up to use in co-cultures
Goranci-Buzhala et al[23]GuidedEB formation/neural inductionULA 96-wellNIM-ROCKi-5 days
ECM embeddingNRNeurobasal + DMEM/F12N2s, B27s without vitamin A, 2-ME, human insulin, L-glutamin, MEM-NEAA-Matrigel4 days
Neural differentiation/maturationSpinner flaskNeurobasal + DMEM/F12N2s, B27s without vitamin A, 2-ME, human insulin, L-glutamin, MEM-NEAADM and SB-431542-Up to use in co-cultures (> 10 days)
Linkous et al[24]UnguidedEB formation/neural inductionLA 96-wellNIM-ROCKi-6-7 days
Rosettes formationMatrigel-coated 6-wellNIM---11-14 days
ECM embeddingNRNeurobasal + DMEM/F12N2s, B27s without vitamin A, 2-ME, human insulin, Glutamax, MEM-NEAA-Matrigel4 days
Neural differentiation/maturationSpinning bioreactor or orbital shakerNeurobasal + DMEM/F12N2s, B27s with vitamin A, 2-ME, human insulin, Glutamax and, MEM-NEAA--Up to use in co-cultures (> 25 days)
Table 4 Analysis of the invasion of glioblastoma model into neural organoids
Ref.
Co-culture method
Co-culture time (days)
Groups evaluated
Invasion analysis method
Invasion analysis results
General purpose
Van De Looverbosch et al[33]GSCs cells were plated onto the NOs131000 GSCs Fluorescence images and computing mapping (with clearing)For both samples, most isolated GSCs were found dispersed between 25 and 200 μm from their surfaceTo demonstrate the value of computing mapping based on deep learning for counting cells in spheroids, identifying differentially labeled subpopulations in spheroids, and mapping the invasion of GBM cells into NOs
2000 GSCs
Ferreira et al[34]GBM cells were plated onto the NOs ULA 6-well plates with shaker (65 rpm)14Mock group (7 and 14 days)Confocal fluorescence images and flow cytometrySignificant reduction in tumor cell proportion on ZIKV group and all CNS tumor cell lines reached the inner regions of the NOs after two weeksTo establish a co-culture model of human NOs with cancer cells from various CNS tumors and utilize these assemblies to investigate the oncolytic effects of ZIKV
ZIKV infection group (20000 PFU) (7 and 14 days)
Pedrosa et al[25]GBM cells or spheroids were plated onto the NOs412000 GBM cellsConfocal fluorescence images and phase-contrast imagesGFP-GICs started to integrate 24 hours after co-culture began. By 15 days, GFP-GIC7 and GFP-PG88 attached to and entered the Nos. By 41 days, both had successfully invaded and multiplied inside the NOsTo evaluate 5-ALA-mediated PDT for GBM treatment, aiming to eliminate infiltrating tumor cells while preserving normal tissue using GBM-initiating cells (GIC7 and PG88) in NOs
2 tumor spheres
Fedorova et al[35]GBM spheroids were placed on top of NOs (inclined at 45°)30, 60, and 90Inclined planeConfocal fluorescence images (with clearing)GBM migration into NOs increases over time. Migration distance and cell number are significantly higher at 60 and 90 days, with the highest number of migrating cells at 60 days. Matrigel and Geltrex increased GBM cell migration to NOs compared to the system without ECM. Matrigel showed a higher number of cells distant from the GBM/NOs border compared to GeltrexTo propose a GLICO model to study GBM growth and migration in NOs, highlighting the impact of ECM proteins
GBM spheroids were placed of NOs embedded in a droplet of Matrigel or Geltrex in a ULA dishes with orbital shaker (0.035 g)Matrigel
Geltrex
Bassot et al[36]GSCs cells were plated onto the NOs5Control (miR-ctrl)Immunofluorescence and confocal imagensObserved invasion of the GSCs into the NOs in the miR-Ctrl condition and a stronger signal for Ki-67 in the invasive single cells distant from their primary site, indicating that miRNAs can penetrate the NOs and affect GBM invasive capacityTo identify miR-17-3p, miR-222, and miR-340 as key regulators of GBM aggressiveness. Their combined modulation inhibits tumor growth, induces cell death, and shows therapeutic potential in GBM models
Transfected (miR-17-3p, miR-222, miR-340)
Goranci-Buzhala et al[37]GSCs cells were plated onto the NOs in a ULA-Lumox dish20Nek2-KD protein expressed with DOXImmunofluorescence and confocal imagens (with clearing)Nek2-KD-expressing GSCs failed to enter brain organoids. Naive cells diffused and recapitulated the known characteristics of invading GSCs, such as establishing protrusion-like processes in the form of microtubes. Nek2-KD-expressing U3047MG cells exhibited impaired invasion and failed to grow in NOsTo explore how GSCs suppress ciliogenesis to maintain self-renewal and tumor progression. Restoring cilia formation induces GSC differentiation, reducing tumor infiltration. The study suggests cilium induction as a potential therapy for GBM
Naíve (control)
Azzarelli et al[14]GSCs cells were plated in ULA 96-well plate onto NOs 6 cm dishes710000 cellsConfocal fluorescence imagesOn low density, the GSCs group shows some individual cells dispersed sparsely across NOs, the invasion by interconnected streams was more prominent in high-density GSCs group. The behavior of the two cell lines was comparable (genetic profile, classified as RTKI and present PDGFRα amplification)Followed the behavior of two different cell lines in the GOC system and found that GSCs with similar genetic alterations exhibit comparable behaviors upon organoid engraftment
50000 cells
Krieger et al[38]GBM cells were plated onto the NOs in a GravityTRAP-ULA + centrifuged (100 g per 3 minutes)2Patient F2Immunohistochemistry and confocal images (with clearing)To similar NOs size, the fraction of NOs volume taken up by tumor cells was similar across the 4 patient-derived cell lines, with similar sizes. Tumor cells spread widely in all cases. Invasion depths exceeded 100 μm in the majority, with some cells detected at 300 μm from the surface. Cells from patients F6 and F9 were less invasive than cells from F2 and F3To investigate GBM invasion in a human-derived model using NOs as a scaffold. This model provides a clinically relevant platform for studying GBM
Patient F3
Patient F6
Patient F9
Goranci-Buzhala et al[23]GSCs spheres were plated onto the NOs3-1020 days-old organoidsFluorescence (with clearing) and time-lapse imagesGSCs integrated faster into older organoids, suggesting that mature NOs create a favorable environment for GSC growth, likely driven by neuronal activity and factors like NLGN3. Additionally, differences in invasive patterns were shown between primary and recurrent GSCsTo establish three different methods to assess GSC invasion in NOs and develop imaging techniques to validate organoids as reliable models. The assays reveal GSC affinities for organoids at different stages and capture key invasion aspects
40 days-old organoids
60 days-old organoids
Linkous et al[24]GSCs cells were plated in 24-well plate onto NOs with shaker14Control groupFluorescence (with clearing), luciferase activity and histopathologicalGSC-827 exhibited infiltrative edges with tumor cells invading normal NOs, while GSC-923 showed a diffuse invasion pattern, resembling GBM patient samples. Both cell types (827 and 923) formed a network of tumor microtubes that facilitated infiltration into NOsTo train GLICO models for high throughput drug screening
TMZ group
BCNU group
Ionizing radiation (0, 5 and 10 Gy)