BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Review
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Stem Cells. Dec 26, 2025; 17(12): 114170
Published online Dec 26, 2025. doi: 10.4252/wjsc.v17.i12.114170
Table 1 Comparison of traditional drugs, living drugs and extracellular vesicles
Characteristic
Conventional drugs
Living drugs
Acellular methods
CompositionChemical compounds (e.g., small molecules, biologics)Viable, metabolically active cells (e.g., stem cells, T cells)Purified growth factors, EVs, cytokines
Mechanism of actionAct as inert agents to exert biochemical effectsTwo mechanisms: (1) Secretion of trophic and immunomodulatory factors; and (2) Direct cell replacement or structural contributionMimic paracrine signaling but lack adaptive cellular activity
Cellular activityInert, no real-time interaction with cellsSenses surroundings, adapts to the microenvironment, integrates with physiological processesCannot sense environment, grow, or interact with other cells
Adaptive responseNo adaptive responseAdaptive paracrine signaling and, in some cases, lineage contributionNo adaptability or real-time response
ExamplesSmall-molecule drugs, biologics (e.g., monoclonal antibodies)Stem cells, T cells, NK cells, MSCs, CAR-T, TILs, iPSC-derived productsASC-derived EVs, growth factors, cytokines
Therapeutic effectsTarget specific biochemical pathwaysReplicate, migrate to injury sites, secrete therapeutic factors, modulate immune responseProvide paracrine benefits but cannot replace or integrate into tissues
Sustained effectShort-term effects, often require repeated administrationPotential for sustained therapeutic outcomes (e.g., CAR-T)Limited sustained effect without live cell interactions
Integration with bodyDoes not integrate with body systems beyond biochemical effectsIntegrates with body, modulates tissue repair, and immune responseNo integration with body; only mimics certain therapeutic benefits
Regenerative potentialLimited regenerative capabilityCan promote tissue repair, angiogenesis, and immunomodulationLimited regenerative potential; mainly offers supportive factors
Safety concernsRisk of side effects and toxicityRisks related to cell survival, fate control, and immune rejectionReduced safety concerns compared to whole cells but lacks dynamic response capabilities
Examples in therapyPain relief, antibiotics, cancer biologicsMSCs, CAR-T, TILs, NK cells in regenerative and oncological therapiesEVs from stem cells, purified cytokines in regenerative medicine
Table 2 Adipose tissue types and characteristics
Adipose tissue
Primary function
Morphology
Location in humans
Metabolic role
Plasticity
Regenerative potential
Prevalence in adult humans
WATEnergy storage, endocrine regulationUnilocular adipocytesSubcutaneous, visceral depotsLipid storage and mobilization (lipolysis)HighRich source of SVF and ASCs for clinical useAbundant
BATNon-shivering thermogenesisMultilocular adipocytesSupraclavicular and paravertebral regionsOxidative metabolism for heat productionLow-moderateEndocrine activity (less used as a cell source clinically)Limited, depot-specific
Beige adipose tissue (brite or brown-in-white)Inducible thermogenesisInducible multilocular adipocytesScattered within WAT, mainly subcutaneousAdaptive energy expenditure upon recruitmentModerateParacrine recruitment potentialPresent, recruitable
Table 3 Summary of protocols used in different studies for enzymatic and mechanical isolation of stromal vascular fraction
Ref.
Protocols
Enzymatic isolation of SVF
Tiryaki et al[28]Digestive agentCollagenase NB6, 0.1 U/mL, 1:1 (enzyme:fat, v/v)
Incubation37 °C for 45 minutes, gentle agitation
Centrifugation300 × g for 5 minutes
Agostini et al[29]Digestive agentCollagenase NB6 (SERVA, GMP grade), 0.15 U/mL
Incubation37 °C for 60-70 minutes
Centrifugation400 × g, for 10 minutes at 4 °C
Winnier et al[30]Digestive agentMatrase reagent (transpose RT kit)
IncubationKit-specified
CentrifugationClosed system separation/filtration per kit protocol
Mechanical isolation of SVF
Tiryaki et al[28]Digestive agentPass lipoaspirate through sequential blade grids (1000 μm, 750 μm, 500 μm). Ca/Mg balanced buffer, fat:buffer, 1:3
Incubation10 minutes shaking after buffer addition
Centrifugation2000 × g for 10 minutes
Solodeev et al[25]Digestive agentRun actuator-driven rotating blades to mechanically disrupt tissue with 350 mL prewarmed saline
Incubation< 15 minutes mechanical agitation inside a closed system
Centrifugation400 × g for 15 minutes
Yaylacı et al[27]Digestive agentPass fat repeatedly through blade grids (2.4 mm → 1.2 mm → 0.6 mm)
IncubationSequential 31 + 101 passes
Centrifugation400 × g for 10 minutes
Table 4 Comparison of stromal vascular fraction and adipose-derived stem cells
Features
SVF
ASCs
DefinitionA heterogeneous cell mixture obtained directly from adipose tissue enzymatically or mechanically, comprising diverse stromal and immune cell populationsA relatively homogeneous mesenchymal stromal cell population derived from adherent culture and expansion of SVF
CompositionFibroblasts, endothelial cells, pericytes, smooth muscle cells, blood-derived cells, immune cells (T-cells, macrophages), and progenitor and stem cells (ASCs)Enriched in plastic-adherent multipotent MSCs with a fibroblast-like morphology, showing minimal hematopoietic contamination after passaging
HeterogeneityHighly heterogeneousRelatively homogeneous
MarkersCD34, CD45, CD31CD73, CD90, CD105
Isolation methodsSingle-step procedure following collagenase digestion or mechanical dissociation, without the need for culture or expansionRequires isolation from SVF followed by culture expansion over many days to weeks to enrich the adherent cell population
Mechanism of actionVascular/immune cells drive angiogenesis, immunomodulation, and tissue support, while ASCs contribute differentiationCombination of direct differentiation and strong paracrine effects (secretion of VEGF, HGF, IGF-1, extracellular vesicles)
Differentiation potentialVariable potential (due to cellular heterogeneity)Multilineage potential (adipogenic, osteogenic, chondrogenic)
Timeframe for useImmediate use application (cells can be reinjected within the same procedure)Not immediate use (requires laboratory processing and expansion)
Yield per gram of ATYields approximately 500000 to 2000000 nucleated cells per gram of fat but only 1%-10% are progenitors/stem cells[50]Yields approximately 5000-200000 ASCs per gram of fat after culture expansion depending on passages and technique[51]
ScalabilityConstrained by harvest volume and regulatory restrictions, as large-scale expansion is not feasible with same-day isolationsEasily scalable through in vitro expansion, allowing production of large cell doses from relatively small adipose samples
Clinical readinessUsed in autologous cell therapies (especially for cosmetic and orthopedic applications) as regulatory approval easier since it regarded as minimally manipulatedOngoing clinical trials in diverse fields (cardiovascular, musculoskeletal, inflammatory) as this requires GMP culture facilities
Key advantagesQuick, cost-effective, and maintains cellular diversityMore defined, reproducible, and expandable population
Current limitationsBatch variability, lower predictability of outcomes and regulatory debate on enzymatic methodsTime-consuming, cost-intensive, requires GMP conditions for clinical use