Copyright
©The Author(s) 2026.
World J Gastroenterol. Feb 14, 2026; 32(6): 114600
Published online Feb 14, 2026. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v32.i6.114600
Published online Feb 14, 2026. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v32.i6.114600
Table 1 Basic information of included studies
| Ref. | Country | Comparison (n) | Follow-up | Outcome |
| Delko et al[12], 2024 | Switzerland | RYGB (40) vs OAGB (40) | 12 months | %EWL, GERD remission, GERD onset, complication |
| Eskandaros et al[13], 2021 | Egypt | RYGB (40) vs OAGB (40) | 12 months | BMI reduction, %EWL, change in PPI usage |
| Ospanov et al[14], 2024 | Kazakhstan | OAGB (50) vs OAGB + antiflux (100) | 24 months | BMI reduction, complication |
| Biter et al[15], 2017 | United States and Netherland | RYGB (71) vs SG (74) | 12 months | BMI reduction, %EWL, GERD onset, complication |
| Kermansaravi et al[16], 2024 | Iran and Spain | OAGB (49) vs OAGB + antiflux (49) | 12 months | GERD remission, GERD onset |
| Lee et al[17], 2025 | New Zealand | RYGB (22) vs SG (21) | 90 months | Change in PPI usage |
| Level et al[18], 2021 | Venezuela | RYGB (19) vs OAGB (9) | 60 months | BMI reduction, %EWL, GERD remission1 |
| Musella et al[19], 2021 | Italy | OAGB (28) vs SG (30) | 12 months | BMI reduction, change in esophagitis |
| Olmi et al[20], 2022 | Italy | SG (140) vs SG + antiflux (138) | 12 months | BMI reduction, GERD onset, change in PPI usage, change in esophagitis, complication |
| Salman et al[21], 2023 | Egypt | RYGB (31) vs OAGB (31) | 6 months | BMI reduction, %EWL, GERD onset, change in PPI usage |
| Shivakumar et al[22], 2018 | India | OAGB (101) vs SG (100) | 36 months | %EWL, GERD onset, complication |
| Snyder et al[23], 2016 | United States | SG (36) vs SG + antiflux (41) | 12 months | BMI reduction, %EWL, GERD onset |
| Robert et al[24], 2024 | France | RYGB (118) vs OAGB (114) | 60 months | %EWL, GERD onset, change in PPI usage, complication |
| Wågen Hauge et al[25], 2025 | Norway | RYGB (54) vs SG (55) | 60 months | BMI reduction, change in PPI usage, change in esophagitis, complication |
| Salminen et al[26], 2022 | Finland | RYGB (119) vs SG (121) | 120 months | %EWL, GERD remission, GERD onset, change in PPI usage, complication |
| Kraljevic et al[27], 2025 | Switzerland | RYGB (73) vs SG (69) | 120 months | BMI reduction, GERD remission, GERD onset, complication |
Table 2 League table showing pairwise comparisons of included interventions
| Interventions | |||||
| Body mass index reduction [MD (95%CI)] | |||||
| OAGBantiflux | RYGB | SG | SGantiflux | ||
| OAGB | 2.60 (0.16-5.04) | 0.10 (-1.47 to 1.68) | -0.83 (-2.73 to 1.07) | -1.96 (-4.61 to 0.70) | |
| OAGBantiflux | - | -2.50 (-5.40 to 0.40) | -3.43 (-6.52 to -0.34) | -4.56 (-8.16 to -0.95) | |
| RYGB | - | - | -0.94 (-2.28 to 0.41) | -2.06 (-4.35 to 0.23) | |
| SG | - | - | - | -1.12 (-2.98 to 0.73) | |
| Percent excess weight loss [MD (95%CI)] | |||||
| RYGB | SG | SGantiflux | |||
| OAGB | -3.70 (-7.24 to -0.16) | -7.71 (-12.58 to -2.83) | -9.71 (-19.36 to -0.05) | ||
| RYGB | - | -4.01 (-8.47 to 0.45) | -6.01 (-15.46 to 3.45) | ||
| SG | - | - | -2.00 (-10.34 to 6.34) | ||
| GERD remission [RD (95%CI)] | |||||
| OAGBantiflux | RYGB | SG | SGantiflux | ||
| OAGB | -0.41 (-3.71 to 2.89) | 2.95 (-1.21 to 7.10) | 1.61 (-3.10 to 6.31) | 0.85 (-4.79 to 6.49) | |
| OAGBantiflux | - | 3.35 (-1.95 to 8.66) | 2.01 (-3.73 to 7.76) | 1.26 (-5.27 to 7.79) | |
| RYGB | - | - | -1.34 (-3.55 to 0.87) | -2.09 (-5.90 to 1.72) | |
| SG | - | - | - | -0.75 (-3.86 to 2.35) | |
| GERD onset [RR (95%CI)] | |||||
| OAGBantiflux | RYGB | SG | SGantiflux | ||
| OAGB | -1.43 (-2.71 to -0.15) | -1.15 (-1.94 to -0.36) | 0.32 (-0.69 to 1.33) | 0.42 (-1.09 to 1.92) | |
| OAGBantiflux | - | 0.28 (-1.23 to 1.78) | 1.75 (0.12-3.38) | 1.84 (-0.13 to 3.82) | |
| RYGB | - | - | 1.47 (0.69-2.25) | 1.57 (0.21-2.92) | |
| SG | - | - | - | 0.09 (-1.02 to 1.20) | |
| Change in proton pump inhibitor usage [RR (95%CI)] | |||||
| RYGB | SG | SGantiflux | |||
| OAGB | -0.03 (-0.22 to 0.16) | 0.14 (-0.11 to 0.38) | 0.01 (-0.35 to 0.38) | ||
| RYGB | - | 0.16 (0.00-0.32) | 0.04 (-0.27 to 0.35) | ||
| SG | - | - | -0.12 (-0.39 to 0.15) | ||
| Change in esophagitis [RR (95%CI)] | |||||
| RYGB | SG | SGantiflux | |||
| OAGB | 0.40 (0.34-0.47) | 0.45 (0.39-0.50) | 0.23 (0.17-0.29) | ||
| RYGB | - | 0.04 (0.01-0.08) | -0.17 (-0.21 to -0.13) | ||
| SG | - | - | -0.21 (-0.23 to -0.20) | ||
| Complication [RD (95%CI)] | |||||
| OAGBantiflux | RYGB | SG | SGantiflux | ||
| OAGB | -1.28 (-3.11 to 0.56) | -0.24 (-1.04 to 0.57) | -0.25 (-1.12 to 0.62) | 1.15 (-0.58 to 2.88) | |
| OAGBantiflux | - | 1.04 (-0.96 to 3.04) | 1.03 (-1.00 to 3.06) | 2.43 (-0.10 to 4.95) | |
| RYGB | - | - | -0.01 (-0.64 to 0.61) | 1.38 (-0.24 to 3.00) | |
| SG | - | - | - | 1.40 (-0.10 to 2.89) | |
Table 3 Surface under the cumulative ranking curve ranking table presenting the probabilities of each surgery being ranked for each outcome
| Outcomes | Rank | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
| Body mass index reduction | OAGB | 1.61% | 44.33% | 32.52% | 13.73% | 7.82% |
| OAGBantiflux | 88.63% | 4.66% | 2.68% | 2.06% | 1.97% | |
| RYGB | 6.30% | 40.17% | 44.64% | 6.86% | 2.04% | |
| SG | 1.28% | 6.37% | 15.23% | 67.62% | 9.50% | |
| SGantiflux | 2.19% | 4.47% | 4.94% | 9.73% | 78.67% | |
| Percent excess weight loss | OAGB | 91.00% | 7.45% | 1.27% | 0.29% | - |
| RYGB | 3.03% | 78.64% | 14.01% | 4.33% | - | |
| SG | 0.81% | 5.34% | 64.39% | 29.47% | - | |
| SGantiflux | 5.16% | 8.58% | 20.34% | 65.92% | - | |
| GERD remission | OAGB | 0.00% | 0.22% | 0.50% | 71.59% | 27.69% |
| OAGBantiflux | 0.01% | 0.14% | 0.28% | 27.79% | 71.78% | |
| RYGB | 99.99% | 0.01% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | |
| SG | 0.00% | 93.61% | 6.26% | 0.12% | 0.02% | |
| SGantiflux | 0.00% | 6.03% | 92.96% | 0.50% | 0.51% | |
| GERD onset | OAGB | 13.99% | 21.40% | 64.24% | 0.37% | 0.00% |
| OAGBantiflux | 0.16% | 0.43% | 1.76% | 38.40% | 59.24% | |
| RYGB | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.14% | 59.24% | 40.62% | |
| SG | 31.69% | 54.52% | 13.40% | 0.40% | 0.00% | |
| SGantiflux | 54.16% | 23.65% | 20.45% | 1.60% | 0.14% | |
| Change in Proton pump inhibitor usage | OAGB | 13.22% | 25.75% | 31.91% | 29.12% | - |
| RYGB | 1.34% | 16.80% | 46.09% | 35.77% | - | |
| SG | 67.47% | 26.74% | 5.16% | 0.63% | - | |
| SGantiflux | 17.97% | 30.71% | 16.85% | 34.48% | - | |
| Change in esophagitis | OAGB | 2.98% | 5.14% | 16.60% | 75.29% | - |
| RYGB | 34.43% | 40.61% | 18.14% | 6.82% | - | |
| SG | 51.39% | 39.37% | 8.67% | 0.58% | - | |
| SGantiflux | 11.20% | 14.88% | 56.60% | 17.31% | - | |
| Complication | OAGB | 1.29% | 69.35% | 17.62% | 11.30% | 0.44% |
| OAGBantiflux | 0.26% | 3.41% | 3.07% | 2.51% | 90.75% | |
| RYGB | 0.08% | 15.07% | 47.82% | 33.82% | 3.21% | |
| SG | 0.01% | 10.86% | 31.27% | 52.27% | 5.59% | |
| SGantiflux | 98.36% | 1.31% | 0.23% | 0.09% | 0.01% |
- Citation: Xing Y, Yan WM, Bai RX. Effects of bariatric surgery on obesity associated gastroesophageal reflux disease: Insights from a systematic review and network meta-analysis. World J Gastroenterol 2026; 32(6): 114600
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v32/i6/114600.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v32.i6.114600
