BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Retrospective Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2026.
World J Gastroenterol. Feb 14, 2026; 32(6): 113195
Published online Feb 14, 2026. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v32.i6.113195
Table 1 Baseline data comparison (training vs validation groups)
Variable
Training group (n = 277)
Validation group (n = 144)
External validation group (n = 138)
Statistical values
P value
Sex
Male18296910.0400.980
Female954847
History of smoking
Yes13678671.1900.552
No1416671
History of alcohol consumption
Yes13065620.2040.903
No1477976
History of hypertension
Yes8954471.2180.544
No1889091
History of diabetes
Yes3316160.0600.971
No244128122
Hepatitis B
Yes193106892.7780.249
No843849
Child-Pugh classification
A17092850.2730.872
B1075253
Tumor diameter
≥ 5 cm12055541.2850.526
< 5 cm1578984
Tumor number
Single2211111120.7590.684
Multiple563326
Degree of differentiation
Poorly differentiated3620200.1900.909
Moderately or well differentiated241124118
Vascular invasion
Yes6630350.8530.653
No211114103
Hepatic vein infiltration
Yes181180.4000.819
No259133130
Portal vein infiltration
Yes3720180.0450.978
No240124120
Cirrhosis
Yes16580790.6640.717
No1126459
AFP
≥ 400 μg/L7545370.9650.617
< 400 μg/L20299101
WBC (× 109/L)6.62 ± 1.286.74 ± 1.246.55 ± 1.330.8440.431
PLT (× 109/L)137.67 ± 24.72138.74 ± 23.50138.56 ± 22.910.1190.888
ALB (g/L)39.03 ± 7.6639.74 ± 7.7338.90 ± 7.830.5200.595
ALT (U/L)95.23 ± 17.3795.34 ± 16.3592.87 ± 17.041.0370.355
AST (U/L)100.87 ± 18.07100.05 ± 17.43100.62 ± 17.580.1000.905
TBIL (μmol/L)19.42 (16.69, 21.34)19.41 (16.59, 22.29)19.16 (15.97, 21.18)0.8730.646
Table 2 Baseline data comparison (good vs poor prognosis groups in the training group)
Variable
Poor prognosis group (n = 67)
Good prognosis group (n = 210)
Statistical values
P value
Sex
Male461360.3420.559
Female2174
History of smoking
Yes301060.6600.416
No37104
History of alcohol consumption
Yes32980.0240.876
No35112
History of hypertension
Yes21680.0250.874
No46142
History of diabetes
Yes10230.7640.382
No57187
Hepatitis B
Yes461470.0430.835
No2163
Child-Pugh classification
A411290.0010.973
B2681
Tumor diameter
≥ 5 cm37835.0990.024
< 5 cm30127
Tumor number
Single481733.6320.057
Multiple1937
Degree of differentiation
Poorly differentiated13233.2080.073
Moderately or well differentiated54187
Vascular invasion
Yes23435.3700.020
No44167
Hepatic vein infiltration
Yes6120.8780.349
No61198
Portal vein infiltration
Yes15226.2280.013
No52188
Cirrhosis
Yes471184.1090.043
No2092
AFP
≥ 400 μg/L334222.015< 0.001
< 400 μg/L34168
WBC (× 109/L)6.96 ± 1.256.51 ± 1.272.5830.011
PLT (× 109/L)141.88 ± 25.84136.32 ± 24.271.5550.123
ALB (g/L)38.28 ± 8.2139.27 ± 7.48-0.8860.378
ALT (U/L)96.51 ± 17.7694.83 ± 17.270.6790.499
AST (U/L)100.42 ± 18.82101.01 ± 17.87-0.2240.823
TBIL (μmol/L)19.39 ± 3.7319.22 ± 3.610.330.742
Table 3 Receiver operating characteristic curve parameters of the training and validation groups
Marker
AUC
95%CI
Specificity, %
Sensitivity, %
Youden index, %
Cut off
Accuracy, %
Precision
F1 score, %
LASSO risk score (training group)0.7560.687-0.82467.6274.6342.25-1.25669.3174.6354.05
LASSO risk score (validation group)0.750.659-0.84154.9584.8539.80-1.60461.8184.8550.45
Table 4 Calculation of patient score
Variable
Patient 1
Patient 2
WBC (× 109/L)9.525.5
Tumor diameter< 5 cm≥ 5 cm
Vascular invasionYesNo
Portal vein infiltrationYesNo
CirrhosisYesYes
AFP≥ 400 μg/L< 400 μg/L
Total score418268
Probability of poor prognosis100%32.5%