Copyright
©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Gastroenterol. Dec 7, 2025; 31(45): 112518
Published online Dec 7, 2025. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v31.i45.112518
Published online Dec 7, 2025. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v31.i45.112518
Table 1 Clinicopathological features of the 854 patients and their lesions, n (%)
| Variables | 854 patients |
| Sex | |
| Male | 627 (73.4) |
| Female | 227 (26.6) |
| Age, mean ± SD, years | 62.0 ± 9.8 |
| Location | |
| Upper1 | 233 (27.2) |
| Middle2 | 279 (32.7) |
| Lower3 | 325 (38.1) |
| Residual stomach | 17 (2.0) |
| Macroscopic type | |
| Type 0-I | 51 (6.0) |
| Type 0-IIa | 362 (42.4) |
| Type 0-IIb | 39 (4.6) |
| Type 0-IIc | 390 (45.6) |
| Type 0-III | 12 (1.4) |
| Tumor size (mm) | |
| ≤ 20 | 508 (59.5) |
| 21-30 | 207 (24.2) |
| > 31 | 139 (16.3) |
| Ulceration | |
| (−) | 567 (66.4) |
| (+) | 287 (33.6) |
| Histopathological type | |
| Differentiated | 704 (82.4) |
| Undifferentiated | 150 (17.6) |
| Horizontal margin | |
| (−) | 830 (97.2) |
| (+) | 24 (2.8) |
| Vertical margin | |
| (−) | 790 (92.5) |
| (+) | 64 (7.5) |
Table 2 Accuracy of stereomicroscopy diagnose the invasion depth in early gastric cancers, %
| Stereomicroscopy diagnosis | Pathological stage | Accuracy | Sensitivity | Specificity | PPV | NPV | |
| T1a | T1b | ||||||
| Ulceration absent | NA | NA | 93.5 | 95.0 | 86.9 | 96.9 | 80.2 |
| M | 437 | 14 | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
| SM | 23 | 93 | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
| Ulceration present | NA | NA | 35.8 | 19.1 | 95.2 | 93.5 | 24.8 |
| M | 42 | 3 | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
| SM | 182 | 60 | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
Table 3 Clinicopathological features of patients with gastric cancer accurately diagnosed and misdiagnosed by stereomicroscopy, n (%)
| Factors | Stereomicroscopy diagnosis | P value | |
| Accurately, n = 632 | Misdiagnosed, n = 222 | ||
| Location | |||
| Upper | 168 (72.1) | 5 (27.9) | 0.113 |
| Middle | 196 (70.3) | 83 (29.7) | |
| Lower | 255 (78.5) | 70 (21.5) | |
| Residual stomach | 13 (76.5) | 4 (23.5) | |
| Macroscopic type | |||
| Type 0-I | 42 (82.4) | 9 (17.6) | 0.179 |
| Type 0-IIa | 276 (76.2) | 86 (23.8) | |
| Type 0-IIb | 30 (76.9) | 9 (23.1) | |
| Type 0-IIc | 277 (71.0) | 113 (29.0) | |
| Type 0-III | 7 (58.3) | 5 (41.7) | |
| Tumor size (mm) | |||
| ≤ 20 | 404 (79.5) | 104 (20.5) | < 0.001 |
| 21-30 | 138 (66.7) | 69 (33.3) | |
| > 31 | 90 (64.7) | 49 (35.3) | |
| Ulceration | |||
| (−) | 530 (93.5) | 37 (6.5) | < 0.001 |
| (+) | 102 (35.5) | 185 (64.5) | |
| Histopathological | |||
| Differentiated | 518 (73.7) | 185 (26.3) | 0.645 |
| Undifferentiated | 114 (75.5) | 37 (24.5) | |
| Horizontal margin | |||
| (−) | 613 (73.9) | 217 (26.1) | 0.559 |
| (+) | 19 (79.2) | 5 (20.8) | |
| Vertical margin | |||
| (−) | 573 (72.5) | 217 (27.5) | < 0.001 |
| (+) | 59 (92.2) | 5 (7.8) | |
Table 4 Multivariate analysis of risk factors misdiagnosed by stereomicroscopy
| Factors | Odds ratio | 95%CI | P value |
| Location | |||
| Middle | 1 | Reference | |
| Upper | 0.9 | 0.622-1.342 | 0.645 |
| Lower | 0.6 | 0.448-0.937 | 0.021 |
| Residual stomach | 0.7 | 0.230-2.294 | 0.586 |
| Macroscopic type | |||
| Type 0-I | 1 | Reference | |
| Type 0-IIa | 0.4 | 0.173-1.122 | 0.086 |
| Type 0-IIb | 0.4 | 0.11-1.681 | 2.225 |
| Type 0-IIc | 0.5 | 0.189-1.218 | 0.122 |
| Type 0-III | 0.2 | 0.044-1.022 | 0.053 |
| Tumor size (mm) | |||
| ≤ 20 | 1 | Reference | |
| 21-30 | 1.6 | 1.011-2.695 | 0.045 |
| ≥ 31 | 1.5 | 0.826-2.575 | 0.193 |
| Ulceration | |||
| (−) | 1 | Reference | |
| (+) | 36.1 | 22.728-57.40 | < 0.001 |
| Histopathological | |||
| Differentiated | 1 | Reference | |
| Undifferentiated | 0.7 | 0.417-1.345 | 0.333 |
| Horizontal margin | |||
| (−) | 1 | Reference | |
| (+) | 0.7 | 0.186-2.742 | 0.624 |
| Vertical margin | |||
| (−) | 1 | Reference | |
| (+) | 0.1 | 0.025-0.221 | < 0.001 |
- Citation: Wang J, Chang L, Niu DF, Yan Y, Cao CQ, Li SJ, Wu Q. Diagnostic accuracy of stereomicroscopy assessment of invasion depth in ex vivo specimens of early gastric cancer. World J Gastroenterol 2025; 31(45): 112518
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v31/i45/112518.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v31.i45.112518
