BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Retrospective Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Gastroenterol. Dec 7, 2025; 31(45): 111540
Published online Dec 7, 2025. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v31.i45.111540
Table 1 Comparison of demographic characteristics between the two groups, n (%)
Variable
LH group (n = 109)
RFA group (n = 145)
t/χ2
P value
Age (years)60.62 ± 12.3762.45 ± 11.321.2290.220
Male gender92 (84.40)125 (86.21)0.1630.687
BMI (kg/m2)23.19 ± 3.0622.68 ± 3.741.1890.236
Type-II diabetes17 (15.60)25 (17.24)0.1220.727
Lineal descent cancer history27 (24.77)38 (26.21)0.0670.795
Alcohol use44 (40.37)56 (38.62)0.0790.778
Cigarette smoking43 (39.45)54 (37.24)0.1290.720
Child-Pugh classification ratio [A/(A + B) × 100%]104 (95.41)135 (93.10)0.5970.440
BCLC level [0/(0 + A) × 100%)]24 (22.02)36 (24.83)0.2720.602
HBsAg (+)89 (81.65)114 (78.62)0.3560.551
Hepatitis C antibody (+)5 (4.59)5 (3.45)0.0190.892
Liver cirrhosis73 (66.97)100 (68.97)0.1140.736
Portal hypertension5 (4.59)13 (8.97)1.8120.178
Tumor number0.4220.516
One101 (92.66)131 (90.34)
Two8 (7.34)14 (9.66)
Mean tumor size (cm)3.05 ± 1.122.48 ± 0.934.319< 0.001
Table 2 Comparison of intraoperative and postoperative data between the two groups
Variable
LH group (n = 109)
RFA group (n = 145)
t/χ2
P value
Operating time (minutes)120.52 ± 33.1943.68 ± 8.4823.598< 0.001
Blood loss (mL)240.05 ± 95.1914.95 ± 4.6724.665< 0.001
Pain score on postoperative day 1 (points)3.14 ± 0.930.95 ± 0.3223.372< 0.001
Time to ambulation after surgery (days)2.32 ± 0.940.76 ± 0.2716.808< 0.001
Time to first oral intake after surgery (days)2.42 ± 0.601.12 ± 0.1422.103< 0.001
AST on postoperative day 2 (IU/L)155.03 ± 57.4078.35 ± 37.7412.117< 0.001
Need for blood transfusion26 (23.85)5 (3.45)24.179< 0.001
Hospital stay (days)10.42 ± 4.516.30 ± 2.908.327< 0.001
Hospital costs (Chinese Yuan)30563.72 ± 3447.6122872.80 ± 2059.5120.681< 0.001
Table 3 Cox regression analysis of the impact variables on disease-free survival
VariableUnivariate
Multivariate
HR (95%CI)
P value
HR (95%CI)
P value
Mean tumor size (≥ 2.84 vs < 2.84)0.500 (0.310-0.810)0.0050.600 (0.370-0.970)0.037
Platelet count (≤ 125.42 vs > 125.42)0.667 (0.470-0.947)0.0220.700 (0.490-0.990)0.045
Surgical approach (LH vs RFA)0.550 (0.380-0.790)0.0010.500 (0.340-0.730)< 0.001
Table 4 Cox regression analysis of the impact variables on overall survival
VariableUnivariate
Multivariate
HR (95%CI)
P value
HR (95%CI)
P value
Mean tumor size (≥ 2.84 vs < 2.84)0.550 (0.350-0.860)0.0080.650 (0.400-1.060)0.085
Platelet count (≤ 125.42 vs > 125.42)0.700 (0.500-0.980)0.0380.750 (0.520-1.080)0.120
Surgical approach (LH vs RFA)0.600 (0.420-0.860)0.0040.550 (0.380-0.790)< 0.001