Vidili G, Arru M, Solinas G, Calvisi DF, Meloni P, Sauchella A, Turilli D, Fabio C, Cossu A, Madeddu G, Babudieri S, Zocco MA, Iannetti G, Di Lembo E, Delitala AP, Manetti R. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System: Lights and shadows in hepatocellular carcinoma and cholangiocellular carcinoma diagnosis. World J Gastroenterol 2022; 28(27): 3488-3502 [PMID: 36158272 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v28.i27.3488]
Corresponding Author of This Article
Gianpaolo Vidili, MD, Assistant Professor, Department of Medical, Surgical and Experimental Sciences, University of Sassari, 8 Viale San Pietro, Sassari 07100, Italy. gianpaolovidili@uniss.it
Research Domain of This Article
Medicine, Research & Experimental
Article-Type of This Article
Retrospective Study
Open-Access Policy of This Article
This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
World J Gastroenterol. Jul 21, 2022; 28(27): 3488-3502 Published online Jul 21, 2022. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v28.i27.3488
Table 1 Characteristics of patients and hepatic nodules
Item
Number or range
Nodules, n
511
Patients, n
269
Males, n (%)
219 (81.4)
Females, n (%)
50 (18.6)
Median age at first nodule (IQR; range)
69 years (61-75; 43-88)
Males (IQR; range)
67 years (59-74; 43-88)
Females (IQR; range)
74.5 years (71-78; 59-85)
Hepatic cirrhosis aetiology (n)
Chronic HCV infection, n (%)
129 (48)
Alcohol abuse, n (%)
45 (16.7)
Chronic HBV infection, n (%)
24 (8.9)
Chronic HCV infection + alcohol abuse, n (%)
21 (7.8)
Chronic HBV + HCV infection, n (%)
8 (3)
NASH, n (%)
6 (2.2)
ChronicHBV infection + alcohol abuse, n (%)
5 (1.9)
Other aetiologies, n (%)
6 (2.2)
Unknown aetiology, n (%)
25 (9.3)
Median diameter of nodules (IQR; range)
24 mm (16-36; 5-200)
Table 2 Rates of different conclusive diagnoses for each Contrast-enhanced ultrasound Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System class
Conclusive diagnosis
%
HCC
ICC
Metastasis
Other malignancy
Benign lesion
Total
CEUS LI-RADS class
CEUS LR-M
11
21
3
1
1
37
7.2
CEUS LR-5
286
0
0
0
2
288
56.4
CEUS LR-4
111
0
0
0
3
114
22.3
CEUS LR-3
15
2
0
2
47
66
12.9
CEUS LR-2
0
0
0
0
5
5
1.0
CEUS LR-1
0
0
0
0
1
1
0.2
Total
423
23
3
3
59
511
100.0
%
82.8
4.5
0.6
0.6
11.5
100.0
Table 3 Rates of hepatocellular carcinoma and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma in different Contrast-enhanced ultrasound Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System classes
CEUS LI-RADS class
HCC
ICC
LR-3
15/66 (22.7%)
2/66 (3%)
LR-4
111/114 (97.4%)
0/114 (0%)
LR-5
286/288 (99.3%)
0/288 (0%)
LR-M
11/37 (29.7%)
21/37 (56.8%)
Table 4 Rates of different contrast-enhanced ultrasound patterns in arterial phase
Arterial phase CEUS pattern
Nodules, n (%)
Homogeneous hyperenhancement
404 (79.1)
Rim hyperenhancement
23 (4.5)
Globular hyperenhancement
1 (0.2)
Isoenhancement
65 (12.7)
Hypoenhancement
18 (3.5)
Table 5 Rate of different portal and late phase contrast-enhanced ultrasound patterns
Portal and late phase CEUS pattern
Nodules, n (%)
Late and mild washout
310 (60.7%)
Early/marked washout
27 (5.3%)
Isoenhancement
157 (30.7%)
Hypoenhancement
15 (2.9%)
Hyperenhancement
2 (0.4%)
Table 6 Diagnostic statistics of different contrast-enhanced ultrasound Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System classes for different diagnosis
Tested association
Sensitivity (%)
Specificity (%)
PPV (%)
NPV (%)
Diagnostic accuracy (%)
Youden’s index
Odds Ratio
P value
CEUS LR M-ICC
91.3 (72.0-98.9)
96.7 (94.7-98.1)
56.8 (39.5-72.9)
99.6 (98.5-99.9)
96.5 (94.5-97.9)
0.880
309.75
< 0.001
CEUS LR 5-HCC
67.6 (62.9-72.1)
97.7 (92.0-99.7)
99.3 (97.5-99.9)
38.6 (32.1-45.3)
72.8 (68.7-76.6)
0.653
89.80
< 0.001
CEUS LR 4-HCC
26.2 (22.1-30.7)
96.6 (90.4-99.3)
97.4 (92.5-99.5)
21.4 (17.5-25.8)
38.4 (34.1-42.7)
0.228
10.10
< 0.001
CEUS LR 4/5-HCC
93.9 (91.1-95.9)
94.3 (87.2-98.1)
98.8 (97.1-99.6)
76.1 (67.0-83.8)
93.9 (91.5-95.8)
0.882
253.50
< 0.001
CEUS LR 3-benign lesion
79.7 (67.2-89.0)
95.8 (93.5-97.5)
71.2 (58.7-81.7)
97.3 (95.3-98.6)
93.9 (91.5-95.8)
0.755
89.26
< 0.001
CEUS LR-3-malignancy
4.2 (2.5-6.5)
20.3 (11.0-32.8)
28.8 (18.3-41.3)
2.7 (1.4-4.7)
6.0 (4.2-8.5)
-0.755
0.01
< 0.001
CEUS LR-3-iso-iso-malignancy
5.3 (0.1-26.0)
19.1 (9.1-33.3)
2.6 (0.1-13.5)
33.3 (16.5-54.0)
15.2 (7.5-26.1)
-0.756
0.01
< 0.001
CEUS LR-3-hypo-hypo-malignancy
57.9 (33.5-79.7)
91.5 (79.6-97.6)
73.3 (44.9-92.2)
84.3 (71.4-93.0)
81.8 (70.4-90.2)
0.494
14.78
< 0.001
Table 7 Classification of nodules for LR-3, LR-4, and LR-5 classes, reported in yellow, orange, and red, respectively
Citation: Vidili G, Arru M, Solinas G, Calvisi DF, Meloni P, Sauchella A, Turilli D, Fabio C, Cossu A, Madeddu G, Babudieri S, Zocco MA, Iannetti G, Di Lembo E, Delitala AP, Manetti R. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System: Lights and shadows in hepatocellular carcinoma and cholangiocellular carcinoma diagnosis. World J Gastroenterol 2022; 28(27): 3488-3502