BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Meta-Analysis
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2026.
World J Gastroenterol. Feb 14, 2026; 32(6): 114600
Published online Feb 14, 2026. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v32.i6.114600
Figure 1
Figure 1  Literature screening process.
Figure 2
Figure 2  Traffic light plot showing the risk of bias assessment of the included studies.
Figure 3
Figure 3  Risk of bias traffic light plot for the included studies.
Figure 4
Figure 4 Network plot of the direct comparisons among the included interventions. A: Body mass index reduction; B: Percent excess weight loss; C: Gastroesophageal reflux disease remission; D: Gastroesophageal reflux disease onset; E: Change in proton pump inhibitor usage; F: Change in esophagitis; G: Complication. The line thickness represents the number of studies comparing the connected interventions. OAGB: One-anastomosis gastric bypass; RYGB: Roux-en-Y gastric bypass; SG: Sleeve gastrectomy.
Figure 5
Figure 5 Surface under the cumulative ranking curve plot showing the probability of each intervention as the most effective. A: Body mass index reduction; B: Percent excess weight loss; C: Gastroesophageal reflux disease remission; D: Gastroesophageal reflux disease onset; E: Change in the proton pump inhibitor usage; F: Change in esophagitis; G: Complication. Higher surface under the cumulative ranking curve values indicates a higher likelihood of being the best treatment. OAGB: One-anastomosis gastric bypass; RYGB: Roux-en-Y gastric bypass; SG: Sleeve gastrectomy.