Retrospective Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2021. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.
World J Gastroenterol. Jul 14, 2021; 27(26): 4236-4245
Published online Jul 14, 2021. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v27.i26.4236
Feasibility of totally laparoscopic gastrectomy without prophylactic drains in gastric cancer patients
Hao Liu, Peng Jin, Xu Quan, Yi-Bin Xie, Fu-Hai Ma, Shuai Ma, Yang Li, Wen-Zhe Kang, Yan-Tao Tian
Hao Liu, Peng Jin, Xu Quan, Yi-Bin Xie, Fu-Hai Ma, Shuai Ma, Yang Li, Wen-Zhe Kang, Yan-Tao Tian, Department of Pancreatic and Gastric Surgery, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, China
Hao Liu, Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, The Second Hospital, Jilin University, Changchun 130041, Jilin Province, China
Author contributions: Liu H and Jin P contributed equally to this work; Xie YB and Xu Q designed the research; Liu H, Jin P, and Ma FH analyzed the data and wrote the main manuscript text; Li Y, Kang WZ, and Ma S collected the patients’ clinical data; Tian YT was involved in study conception and design, data interpretation, manuscript revision, and discussion.
Supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China, No. 81772642; and Capital’s Funds for Health Improvement and Research, No. CFH 2018-2-4022.
Institutional review board statement: This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the National Cancer Center Hospital.
Informed consent statement: Patients were not required to give informed consent to the study because the analysis used anonymous clinical data that were obtained after each patient agreed to treatment by written consent.
Conflict-of-interest statement: The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest to disclose.
Data sharing statement: Some or all data and code generated or used during the study are available from the corresponding author by request
Open-Access: This article is an open-access article that was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/Licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Corresponding author: Yan-Tao Tian, MD, Professor, Surgeon, Department of Pancreatic and Gastric Surgery, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, No. 17 Panjiayuan Nanli, Chaoyang District, Beijing 100021, China. tianyantao@cicams.ac.cn
Received: November 10, 2020
Peer-review started: November 10, 2020
First decision: November 30, 2020
Revised: December 16, 2020
Accepted: March 29, 2021
Article in press: March 29, 2021
Published online: July 14, 2021
Processing time: 243 Days and 14 Hours
ARTICLE HIGHLIGHTS
Research background

Prophylactic drains have been used to remove intraperitoneal collections and detect complications early in open surgery. In the last decades, minimally invasive gastric cancer surgery has been performed worldwide. However, reports on routine prophylactic abdominal drainage after totally laparoscopic distal gastrectomy are few.

Research motivation

To evaluate the feasibility of performing totally laparoscopic distal gastrectomy without prophylactic drains in selected patients.

Research objectives

To evaluate the feasibility of performing totally laparoscopic distal gastrectomy without prophylactic drains in selected patients.

Research methods

Data of patients with distal gastric cancer who underwent totally laparoscopic distal gastrectomy with and without prophylactic drainage at China National Cancer Center/Cancer Hospital from February 2018 to August 2019 were reviewed.

Research results

After PSM, data of 42 pairs were extracted. The incidence of concurrent illness was higher in the drain group (42.9% vs 31.0%, P = 0.258). The overall postoperative complication rates were 19.5% and 10.6% in the drain (n = 76) and no-drain groups (n = 49), respectively; there were no significant differences between the two groups (P > 0.05). The difference between the two groups based on the need for percutaneous catheter drainage was also not significant (9.8% vs 6.4%, P = 0.700). However, patients with a larger body mass index (≥ 29 kg/m2) were prone to postoperative complications (P = 0.042). In addition, the number of days from surgery until the first flatus (4.33 ± 1.24 d vs 3.57 ± 1.85 d, P = 0.029) was greater in the drain group.

Research conclusions

Omitting prophylactic drainage may reduce surgery time and result in faster recovery. Routine prophylactic drains are not necessary in selected patients. A prophylactic drain may be useful in high-risk patients.

Research perspectives

Omitting the use of prophylactic drains can significantly improve the postoperative comfort of patients and does not increase the risk of postoperative complications.