Published online Jan 21, 2026. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v32.i3.111528
Revised: September 25, 2025
Accepted: December 8, 2025
Published online: January 21, 2026
Processing time: 198 Days and 17.8 Hours
The treatment landscape of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has significantly evolved following the introduction of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), which are now the standard of care in first-line systemic therapy. However, as more patients experience progression after ICI-based combinations, the optimal second-line treatment strategy remains undefined. Currently approved agents, such as regorafenib, cabozantinib, and ramucirumab, have not been specifically tested in the post-ICI setting, and their efficacy in this context remains uncertain. This review provides a comprehensive and critical analysis of systemic second-line treatment strategies in patients with unresectable HCC after progression to frontline immunotherapy. We summarize the available evidence from early-phase studies and retrospective series and describe the rationale, efficacy signals, and development status of ongoing clinical trials. Therapeutic approaches include tyrosine kinase inhibitors, novel ICI-based combinations, bispecific antibodies, T-cell therapies (chimeric antigen receptor-T and T-cell receptor-T), and other emerging strategies such as liver-targeted prodrugs and microbiota modulation. While current data are still limited, several trials are ongoing and reflect com
Core Tip: Patients with hepatocellular carcinoma progressing after frontline immunotherapy represent an emerging clinical challenge. This review critically explores the current second-line strategies under investigation, including tyrosine kinase inhibitors, novel immune checkpoint inhibitor-based regimens, bispecific antibodies, and adoptive T-cell therapies. Most approaches are supported by strong biological rationale, although high-quality comparative data are still lacking. The multiplicity of ongoing trials underscores the need for a better understanding of resistance mechanisms and therapeutic sequencing. This review may assist clinicians and researchers in interpreting the evolving landscape and in identifying future directions for personalized, effective post-immunotherapy management.
