Ascari S, Chen R, De Sinno A, Stefanini B, Cescon M, Serenari M, Mosconi C, Tovoli F. Post-immunotherapy second-line strategies for hepatocellular carcinoma: State of the art and ongoing trials. World J Gastroenterol 2026; 32(3): 111528 [DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v32.i3.111528]
Corresponding Author of This Article
Francesco Tovoli, MD, Associate Professor, Division of Internal Medicine, Hepatobiliary and Immunoallergic Sciences, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Via Albertoni 15, Bologna 40138, Emilia-Romagna, Italy. francesco.tovoli2@unibo.it
Research Domain of This Article
Gastroenterology & Hepatology
Article-Type of This Article
Minireviews
Open-Access Policy of This Article
This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Jan 21, 2026 (publication date) through Jan 18, 2026
Times Cited of This Article
Times Cited (0)
Journal Information of This Article
Publication Name
World Journal of Gastroenterology
ISSN
1007-9327
Publisher of This Article
Baishideng Publishing Group Inc, 7041 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 160, Pleasanton, CA 94566, USA
Share the Article
Ascari S, Chen R, De Sinno A, Stefanini B, Cescon M, Serenari M, Mosconi C, Tovoli F. Post-immunotherapy second-line strategies for hepatocellular carcinoma: State of the art and ongoing trials. World J Gastroenterol 2026; 32(3): 111528 [DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v32.i3.111528]
World J Gastroenterol. Jan 21, 2026; 32(3): 111528 Published online Jan 21, 2026. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v32.i3.111528
Post-immunotherapy second-line strategies for hepatocellular carcinoma: State of the art and ongoing trials
Sara Ascari, Rusi Chen, Andrea De Sinno, Bernardo Stefanini, Matteo Cescon, Matteo Serenari, Cristina Mosconi, Francesco Tovoli
Sara Ascari, Rusi Chen, Andrea De Sinno, Bernardo Stefanini, Matteo Cescon, Matteo Serenari, Cristina Mosconi, Francesco Tovoli, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Bologna, Bologna 40138, Emilia-Romagna, Italy
Matteo Cescon, Matteo Serenari, Hepatobiliary and Transplant Surgery Unit, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna 40138, Emilia-Romagna, Italy
Cristina Mosconi, Department of Radiology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna 40138, Emilia-Romagna, Italy
Francesco Tovoli, Division of Internal Medicine, Hepatobiliary and Immunoallergic Sciences, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna 40138, Emilia-Romagna, Italy
Author contributions: Ascari S, Chen R, De Sinno A, and Stefanini B reviewed the literature and wrote the draft; Cescon M, Serenari M, and Mosconi C provided critical analysis of the collected data; Tovoli F designed the study, supervised the project and corrected the draft.
Conflict-of-interest statement: Tovoli F received speaker fees from AstraZeneca, Eisai, MSD, and Roche. The remaining authors declare no conflict of interest.
Open Access: This article is an open-access article that was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: https://creativecommons.org/Licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Corresponding author: Francesco Tovoli, MD, Associate Professor, Division of Internal Medicine, Hepatobiliary and Immunoallergic Sciences, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Via Albertoni 15, Bologna 40138, Emilia-Romagna, Italy. francesco.tovoli2@unibo.it
Received: July 2, 2025 Revised: September 25, 2025 Accepted: December 8, 2025 Published online: January 21, 2026 Processing time: 198 Days and 17.8 Hours
Abstract
The treatment landscape of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has significantly evolved following the introduction of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), which are now the standard of care in first-line systemic therapy. However, as more patients experience progression after ICI-based combinations, the optimal second-line treatment strategy remains undefined. Currently approved agents, such as regorafenib, cabozantinib, and ramucirumab, have not been specifically tested in the post-ICI setting, and their efficacy in this context remains uncertain. This review provides a comprehensive and critical analysis of systemic second-line treatment strategies in patients with unresectable HCC after progression to frontline immunotherapy. We summarize the available evidence from early-phase studies and retrospective series and describe the rationale, efficacy signals, and development status of ongoing clinical trials. Therapeutic approaches include tyrosine kinase inhibitors, novel ICI-based combinations, bispecific antibodies, T-cell therapies (chimeric antigen receptor-T and T-cell receptor-T), and other emerging strategies such as liver-targeted prodrugs and microbiota modulation. While current data are still limited, several trials are ongoing and reflect compelling biological hypotheses. Their diversity highlights both the complexity and the opportunity of this therapeutic space. Future research should focus on identifying predictive biomarkers, optimizing safety, and developing individualized sequencing strategies to enhance outcomes in this rapidly expanding patient population.
Core Tip: Patients with hepatocellular carcinoma progressing after frontline immunotherapy represent an emerging clinical challenge. This review critically explores the current second-line strategies under investigation, including tyrosine kinase inhibitors, novel immune checkpoint inhibitor-based regimens, bispecific antibodies, and adoptive T-cell therapies. Most approaches are supported by strong biological rationale, although high-quality comparative data are still lacking. The multiplicity of ongoing trials underscores the need for a better understanding of resistance mechanisms and therapeutic sequencing. This review may assist clinicians and researchers in interpreting the evolving landscape and in identifying future directions for personalized, effective post-immunotherapy management.