Published online Mar 7, 2024. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v30.i9.1250
Peer-review started: November 11, 2023
First decision: January 5, 2024
Revised: January 8, 2024
Accepted: February 5, 2024
Article in press: February 5, 2024
Published online: March 7, 2024
Processing time: 115 Days and 21 Hours
The utilisation of polygenic scoring models may enhance the clinician’s ability to risk stratify an inflammatory bowel disease patient’s individual risk for venous thromboembolism (VTE) and guide the appropriate usage of VTE thromboprophylaxis, yet there is a need to validate such models in ethnically diverse populations.
Core Tip: Polygenic scoring models may determine an inflammatory bowel disease patient’s actual risk for venous thromboembolism (VTE) with greater accuracy than monogenic screening alone. This may be due to the cumulative effect of multiple pro-thrombotic genetic loci having a greater influence on thrombotic risk, rather than specific genetic mutations. There needs to be cross-validation of such scoring models in ethnically diverse populations as there is significant heterogeneity in the prevalence of genes implicated in thrombophilia. A composite score combining clinical and polygenic risk factors would further enhance the accuracy in determining one’s VTE risk.
