Published online Oct 7, 2024. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v30.i37.4160
Revised: September 6, 2024
Accepted: September 11, 2024
Published online: October 7, 2024
Processing time: 96 Days and 21 Hours
This letter critically evaluates the effects of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) on inflammatory bowel disease, particularly focusing on Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC), as discussed in Liang et al’s recent review. While the review provides significant insights, it relies heavily on cross-sectional and observational studies, which limits the ability to draw causal inferences. The heterogeneous study populations and inconsistent definitions of long-term PPI use further complicate the findings. This letter also highlights the need for rigorous control of confounding factors and considers the potential publication bias in the existing literature. The implications of these issues are discussed in the context of both CD and UC, and future research directions are proposed to address these shortcomings.
Core Tip: This letter critically analyzes the review by Liang et al on the effects of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) on inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), highlighting several methodological flaws. Reliance on cross-sectional and observational studies limits causal inference, and heterogeneous study populations complicate result interpretation. Furthermore, inconsistent definitions of long-term PPI use, inadequate control for confounding factors, and potential publication bias necessitate cautious interpretation. Future research should prioritize large-scale, prospective cohort studies with rigorous control for confounders, standardized outcome measures, and transparent study selection criteria. Addressing these issues is essential for guiding clinical practice effectively and improving outcomes in IBD management.