BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Minireviews
©The Author(s) 2015. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.
World J Gastroenterol. Jan 21, 2015; 21(3): 820-828
Published online Jan 21, 2015. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i3.820
Technical tips of endoscopic ultrasound-guided choledochoduodenostomy
Takeshi Ogura, Kazuhide Higuchi
Takeshi Ogura, Kazuhide Higuchi, Second Department of Internal Medicine, Osaka Medical College, Osaka 569-8686, Japan
Author contributions: Ogura T and Higuchi K equally contributed to this paper.
Correspondence to: Takeshi Ogura, MD, PhD, Second Department of Internal Medicine, Osaka Medical College, 2-7 Daigaku-machi, Takatsuki, Osaka 569-8686, Japan. oguratakeshi0411@yahoo.co.jp
Telephone: +81-7-26831221 Fax: +81-7-26846532
Received: August 2, 2014
Peer-review started: August 2, 2014
First decision: August 27, 2014
Revised: September 12, 2014
Accepted: November 18, 2014
Article in press: November 19, 2014
Published online: January 21, 2015
Processing time: 171 Days and 10.5 Hours
Abstract

Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) is clinically useful not only as a diagnostic tool during EUS-guided fine needle aspiration, but also during interventional EUS. EUS-guided biliary drainage has been developed and performed by experienced endoscopists. EUS-guided choledocoduodenostomy (EUS-CDS) is relatively well established as an alternative biliary drainage method for biliary decompression in patients with biliary obstruction. The reported technical success rate of EUS-CDS ranges from 50% to 100%, and the clinical success rate ranges from 92% to 100%. Further, the over-all technical success rate was 93%, and clinical success rate was 98%. Based on the currently available literature, the overall adverse event rate for EUS-CDS is 16%. The data on the cumulative technical and clinical success rate for EUS-CDS is promising. However, EUS-CDS can still lead to several problems, so techniques or devices that are more feasible and safe need to be established. EUS-CDS has the potential to become a first-line biliary drainage procedure, although standardizing the technique in multicenter clinical trials and comparisons with endoscopic biliary drainage by randomized clinical trials are still needed.

Keywords: Endoscopic ultrasound; Endoscopic ultrasound-guided choledochoduodenostomy; Endoscopic ultrasound-guided biliary drainage; Percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage

Core tip: Endoscopic ultrasound-guided choledocoduodenostomy (EUS-CDS) is relatively well established as an alternative biliary drainage method. The reported technical success rate of EUS-CDS ranges from 50% to 100%, and the clinical success rate ranges from 92% to 100%. Further, the over-all technical success rate was 93%, and clinical success rate was 98%. Based on the currently available literature, the overall adverse event rate for EUS-CDS is 16%. EUS-CDS may become the first choice of the biliary tract drainage procedure in the local cases such as poor prognosis, the contraindication of percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage.

Write to the Help Desk