BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Meta-Analysis
©2014 Baishideng Publishing Group Co., Limited. All rights reserved.
World J Gastroenterol. Jan 7, 2014; 20(1): 303-309
Published online Jan 7, 2014. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i1.303
Controlled low central venous pressure reduces blood loss and transfusion requirements in hepatectomy
Zhi Li, Yu-Ming Sun, Fei-Xiang Wu, Li-Qun Yang, Zhi-Jie Lu, Wei-Feng Yu
Zhi Li, Yu-Ming Sun, Fei-Xiang Wu, Li-Qun Yang, Zhi-Jie Lu, Wei-Feng Yu, Department of Anesthesiology, Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital, the Second Military Medical University, Shanghai 200438, China
Author contributions: Li Z and Sun YM contributed equally to this study; Yu WF and Li Z designed the study and wrote the manuscript; Li Z and Sun YM performed the majority of analyses; Li Z, Wu FX, Yang LQ and Lu ZJ were also involved in revising the manuscript.
Correspondence to: Wei-Feng Yu, MD, Professor, Department of Anaesthesiology, Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital, the Second Military Medical University, No. 225, Changhai Road, Shanghai 200438, China. ywf808@sohu.com
Telephone: +86-21-81875231 Fax: +86-21-81875231
Received: August 18, 2013
Revised: October 7, 2013
Accepted: November 1, 2013
Published online: January 7, 2014
Processing time: 154 Days and 20.8 Hours
Abstract

AIM: To evaluate the effect of low central venous pressure (LCVP) on blood loss and blood transfusion in patients undergoing hepatectomy.

METHODS: Electronic databases and bibliography lists were searched for potential articles. A meta-analysis of all randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating LCVP in hepatectomy was performed. The following three outcomes were analyzed: blood loss, blood transfusion and duration of operation.

RESULTS: Five RCTs including 283 patients were assessed. Meta-analysis showed that blood loss in the LCVP group was significantly less than that in the control group (MD = -391.95, 95%CI: -559.35--224.56, P < 0.00001). In addition, blood transfusion in the LCVP group was also significantly less than that in the control group (MD = -246.87, 95%CI: -427.06--66.69, P = 0.007). The duration of operation in the LCVP group was significantly shorter than that in the control group (MD = -18.89, 95%CI: -35.18--2.59, P = 0.02). Most studies found no significant difference in renal and liver function between the two groups.

CONCLUSION: Controlled LCVP is a simple and effective technique to reduce blood loss and blood transfusion during liver resection, and appears to have no detrimental effects on liver and renal function.

Keywords: Low central venous pressure; Hepatectomy; Blood loss; Blood transfusion

Core tip: The morbidity and mortality after hepatic resection have been reported to correlate with excessive intraoperative blood loss and blood transfusion. This meta-analysis showed that controlled low central venous pressure is a simple and effective technique to reduce blood loss and blood transfusion during liver resection, and appears to have no detrimental effects on liver and renal function.

Write to the Help Desk