Clinical Research
Copyright ©2007 Baishideng Publishing Group Co., Limited. All rights reserved.
World J Gastroenterol. Jul 21, 2007; 13(27): 3714-3720
Published online Jul 21, 2007. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v13.i27.3714
Evaluation of clinical relevance of examining K-ras, p16 and p53 mutations along with allelic losses at 9p and 18q in EUS-guided fine needle aspiration samples of patients with chronic pancreatitis and pancreatic cancer
C Salek, L Benesova, M Zavoral, V Nosek, L Kasperova, M Ryska, R Strnad, E Traboulsi, M Minarik
C Salek, M Zavoral, V Nosek, Department of Gastroenterology, Central Military Hospital and 1st Medical Faculty of Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
C Salek, L Benesova, L Kasperova, M Minarik, Laboratory for Molecular Genetics and Oncology, Genomac International Ltd., Prague, Czech Republic
C Salek, M Zavoral, Department of Gastroenterology, Institute for Postgraduate Medical Education, Prague, Czech Republic
M Ryska, R Strnad, Department of Surgery, Central Military Hospital and 2nd Medical Faculty of Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
E Traboulsi, Department of Pathology, Central Military Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
Author contributions: All authors contributed equally to the work.
Supported by Internal Grant Agency of the Ministry of Health, Czech Republic, No. 8027-3
Correspondence to: Dr. Marek Minarik, Laboratory for Molecular Genetics and Oncology, Genomac International Ltd., Bavorska 856, 15541 Prague 5, Czech Republic. mminarik@email.com
Telephone: +420-224-458048 Fax: +420-224-458021
Received: January 9, 2007
Revised: March 1, 2007
Accepted: March 5, 2007
Published online: July 21, 2007
Abstract

AIM: To establish an optimum combination of molecular markers resulting in best overall diagnostic sensitivity and specificity for evaluation of suspicious pancreatic mass.

METHODS: Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided fine needle aspiration cytology (FNA) was performed on 101 consecutive patients (63 males, 38 females, 60 ± 12 years; 81 with subsequently diagnosed pancreatic cancer, 20 with chronic pancreatitis) with focal pancreatic mass. Samples were evaluated on-site by an experienced cytopathologist. DNA was extracted from Giemsa stained cells selected by laser microdissection and the presence of K-ras, p53 and p16 somatic mutations was tested by cycling-gradient capillary electrophoresis (CGCE) and single-strand conformation polymorphism (SSCP) techniques. In addition, allelic losses of tumor suppressor genes p16 (INK4, CDKN2A) and DPC4 (MADH4, SMAD4) were detected by monitoring the loss of heterozygosity (LOH) at 9p and 18q, respectively.

RESULTS: Sensitivity and specificity of EUS-guided FNA were 75% and 85%, positive and negative predictive value reached 100%. The remaining 26% samples were assigned as inconclusive. Testing of molecular markers revealed sensitivity and specificity of 70% and 100% for K-ras mutations (P < 0.001), 24% and 90% for p53 mutations (NS), 13% and 100% for p16 mutations (NS), 85% and 64% for allelic losses at 9p (P < 0.001) and 78% and 57% for allelic losses at 18q (P < 0.05). When tests for different molecular markers were combined, the best results were obtained with K-ras + LOH at 9p (92% and 64%, P < 0.001), K-ras + LOH at 18q (92% and 57%, P < 0.001), and K-ras + LOH 9q + LOH 18q (96% and 43%, P < 0.001). When the molecular markers were used as complements to FNA cytology to evaluate inconclusive samples only, the overall sensitivity of cancer detection was 100% in all patients enrolled in the study.

CONCLUSION: EUS-guided FNA cytology combined with screening of K-ras mutations and allelic losses of tumor suppressors p16 and DPC4 represents a very sensitive approach in screening for pancreatic malignancy. Molecular markers may find its use particularly in cases where FNA cytology has been inconclusive.

Keywords: Pancreatic cancer; Chronic pancreatitis; Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration; Molecular markers; Loss of heterozygosity