BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Authors Evaluation
Wen W, Liu CX, Wang Y, Lu XJ, Yang C, Chen SJ, Jin ZT, Qu MY, Deng JY, Zhang Z. Hypoxia-preconditioned mesenchymal stem cell-derived exosomes attenuate myocardial ischemia/reperfusion injury by miR-29b-3p via PINK1/Parkin-mediated mitophagy. World J Stem Cells 2026; 18(5): 116611 [DOI: 10.4252/wjsc.v18.i5.116611]
Evaluation of a Journal’s Credibility by Authors
The purpose of an author’s evaluation of a journal’s credibility is to assess the degree of satisfaction with the manuscript editing and publishing process. This evaluation is for user’s reference only.
1 Are you satisfied with the online submission system?
Yes
2 Are you satisfied with the peer review report?
Yes
3 Are you satisfied with the editing quality of the article?
Yes
4 Are you satisfied with the article PDFs?
Yes
5 Are you satisfied with the online full-text article?
Yes
6 Are you satisfied with the prepared figures in the online full-text article?
Yes
7 Are you satisfied with the prepared tables in the online full-text article?
Yes
8 Are you satisfied with the published articles processes?
Yes
9 Are you satisfied with the requirement for providing academic rules and norms?
Yes
10 Are you satisfied with the academic misconduct detection report?
Yes
11 Are you satisfied with the period of publication?
Yes
12 Are you satisfied with the editing and publishing rules and norms?
Yes
Evaluation of a Journal’s Peer Review by Authors
The purpose of an author’s evaluation of a given journal’s peer review is to assess the degree of satisfaction with the peer review process. This evaluation is for user’s reference only.
1 Are you satisfied with the time spent for peer review?
Yes
2 Are you satisfied with the anonymous peer review process?
Yes
3 Is the peer review report of great help to your manuscript?
Yes
4 Do you think the peer review report for your manuscript is fair or objective?
Yes
Author‘s Comments
We are very pleased with the efficient and professional handling of our manuscript by the editorial team of World Journal of Stem Cells. The review process was remarkably fast, and the editorial office responded promptly at every stage, which greatly facilitated the timely dissemination of our work. The editors provided thoughtful and constructive guidance, and their courteous communication made the entire submission experience smooth and positive. We sincerely appreciate the excellent service and would highly recommend this journal to fellow researchers.