Editorial
Artif Intell Med Imaging
1(3):87-93.
Published online Sep 28, 2020.
doi: 10.35711/aimi.v1.i3.87
Abstract (1137)
|
Core Tip (1140)
|
Full Article (HTML) (4018)
|
Figures (1-2) (421)
|
Tables (1-2) (401)
|
Full Article (PDF)-3009K (479)
|
Audio-1812K (10)
|
Peer-Review Report-261K (270)
|
Answering Reviewers-197K (238)
|
Received: 08/23/2020
|
Revised: 09/22/2020
|
Accepted: 09/23/2020
|
CrossRef
|
Google Scholar
|
Times Cited (5)
|
Total Visits (13939)
|
Similar Articles (216)
|
Timeline of Article Publication (3)
|
Authors Evaluation (12)
|
Article Quality Tracking (2)
|
What about the content of this article? (0)
|
Cite
|
(0)
|
Open
Basic Study
Predicting a live birth by artificial intelligence incorporating both the blastocyst image and conventional embryo evaluation parameters
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8bf1e/8bf1e8eea349639b4f739f638ced4fe02a05c6fd" alt=""
Artif Intell Med Imaging
1(3):94-107.
Published online Sep 28, 2020.
doi: 10.35711/aimi.v1.i3.94
Abstract (1633)
|
Core Tip (972)
|
Article Highlights (918)
|
Full Article (HTML) (4290)
|
Figures (1-2) (404)
|
Tables (1-2) (412)
|
Full Article (PDF)-3544K (419)
|
Audio-1505K (14)
|
Peer-Review Report-248K (208)
|
Answering Reviewers-424K (188)
|
Received: 08/24/2020
|
Revised: 09/15/2020
|
Accepted: 09/19/2020
|
CrossRef
|
Google Scholar
|
Times Cited (14)
|
Total Visits (15137)
|
Similar Articles (217)
|
Timeline of Article Publication (8)
|
Authors Evaluation (25)
|
Article Quality Tracking (2)
|
What about the content of this article? (0)
|
Cite
|
(0)
|
Open