Copyright
©The Author(s) 2021.
World J Clin Cases. Mar 26, 2021; 9(9): 2110-2122
Published online Mar 26, 2021. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v9.i9.2110
Published online Mar 26, 2021. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v9.i9.2110
Table 1 Advantages of transdermal drug delivery system administration
Advantages |
Simple administration and improved patient compliance |
Avoids hepatic first pass metabolism |
Avoids direct interaction of drugs with food or other drugs in the gastrointestinal tract, which may affect drug absorption |
Helps in controlled drug delivery and reduces frequency of dosing |
Reduces dosage and side effects |
Can be removed from the skin surface immediately |
Has physical form, characteristics and identification marks so that it can be easily and quickly identified in an emergency (such as when the patient is unresponsive, unconscious or comatose) |
Influencing factor | Effect on transdermal drug absorption |
Drug concentration | Generally, the amount of drug absorbed per unit area per unit time increases with the increase in TDDS drug concentration |
Drug distribution coefficient | Drugs with both water-soluble and fat-soluble properties can be effectively absorbed through the skin. The water-soluble properties of drugs determine the concentration of the drug at the absorption site and the partition coefficient affects the rate of drug transport at the absorption site |
Drug molecular weight | The ideal relative molecular weight for transdermal administration is 400 Da or less |
Carrier factor | The main effects of carriers on percutaneous absorption include solubility of drugs in carriers and change of drug distribution coefficient by carrier |
Site of application and time | The larger the application area (TDDS) and the longer the application time, the more the drugs are absorbed |
Skin conditions | Hydration of skin helps increase percutaneous absorption. TDDS can form a closed water barrier with evaporating sweat to increase the hydration degree of the skin. It can be applied to the thin cuticle, with better absorption through the skin. When the skin is damaged, the drug will directly enter the subcutaneous tissue and capillaries, which may affect the properties of TDDS |
Table 3 Development of transdermal patch[14]
Classification | Characteristic |
First-generation transdermal patch | The drug should have suitable properties (highly potency, low molecular weight and lipophilic) to solve the problem of low oral bioavailability, to reduce the frequency of drug administration or to achieve stable drug administration |
Second-generation transdermal patch | This generation of patch can promote and improve the percutaneous absorption of small molecule drugs by means of a chemical penetration enhancer, ion introduction or ultrasound |
Third-generation transdermal patch | These patches help to promote percutaneous absorption of macromolecules, including therapeutic proteins and vaccines |
Loxoprofen sodium | Ketoprofen | Diclofenac sodium | Flurbiprofen | Indometacin | Ibuprofen | |
Log P value | 1.97 | 2.94 | 4.31 | 3.81 | 4.42 | 3.51 |
Cmax in ng/mL | 61.20 | 891.36 | 0.81 | 43.00 | 27.00 | 556.00 |
Tmax in h | 82.30 | 7.60 | 16.90 | 20.00 | 16.00 | 14.40 |
T1/2 in h | 7.8 | NA | NA | 13.90 | 11.55 | NA |
Fentanyl transdermal patch | Buprenorphine transdermal patch | |
Absorption | Bioavailability, 92%; Plasma protein binding, 79%-87%; Cmax, 2.6 μg/L; Effective time, 12.7-16.6 h; Peak time 38.1 h; AUC, 117 μg/L; H (0-72 h) | Bioavailability, 50%; Plasma protein binding, 96%; Cmax, 305 pg/mL; Onset time 21 h; Peak time, about 60 h; AUC, 20228 pg/mL |
Metabolism | Metabolized by CYP3A4 in the liver, and the metabolites are basically inactive | Metabolized by CYP3A4 in the liver |
Elimination | The half-life of the transdermal patch is about 17 h (13-22 h) | The half-life of the transdermal patch is 25.3 h |
Mechanism | μ opioid receptor agonist | μ opioid receptor partial agonist, δ opioid receptor agonist, weak κ opioid receptor antagonist, ORL-1 agonist |
Indication | Moderate to severe chronic pain and intractable pain treated with opioid analgesics | Chronic pain beyond the control of nonopioid analgesics |
Dosage form specification | 2.1-, 4.2-, 8.4- and 12.6-mg paste; Four specifications, lasting for 72 h | 5-, 10- and 20-mg paste. Each paste is used for 7 d |
Adverse reactions, > 10% | Nausea, headache, constipation, dry mouth, drowsiness, fuzzy consciousness, powerlessness, sweating | Erythema, pruritus, nausea |
Table 6 Quality classification and definition of grade evidence
Quality level | Definition |
High (a) | Very sure that the true effect value is close to the effect value estimation |
Medium (b) | There is a moderate degree of confidence in the value of effect; the real effect value may be close to the estimated value, but there is still a possibility that the two are not the same |
Low (c) | There is limited confidence in the effect estimates; the true effect values may not be the same as the effect estimates |
Very low (d) | There is little confidence in the estimated effect; the true effect value may be quite different from the effect estimate |
Table 7 Grade recommended strength classification and definition
Recommended strength | Explanation | Expression method | Expression method |
Strong recommendations to support the use of an intervention | The advantages of the intervention measures outweigh the disadvantages | Recommended | 1 |
Weak recommendations to support the use of an intervention | Interventions may have more advantages than disadvantages | Recommended use | 2 |
Weak recommendations against the use of an intervention | Interventions may do more harm than good or the relationship between the advantages and disadvantages is not clear | Not recommended | 2 |
Strong recommendations against the use of an intervention | The disadvantages of the intervention measures are obviously greater than the advantages | Not recommended | 1 |
Table 8 Consensus statement of Chinese experts on pain treatment with transdermal patch
Consensus opinion | Recommended strength level of evidence |
The effect of the transdermal patch in pain treatment is clear. It has the advantages of reducing adverse drug reactions and improving patient compliance | 1A |
NSAID transdermal patch is effective in the treatment of chronic skeletal muscle pain with few side effects, which is recommended as the first choice for the treatment of chronic musculoskeletal pain | 1A |
NSAIDs can be used as a combination therapy for neuropathic pain | 2C |
When the efficacy of transdermal NSAIDs alone is not good enough, which can be combined with analgesic drugs of another administration route, such as oral NSAIDs | 2B |
Opioid transdermal patch is effective in the treatment of chronic pain, but it should not be used as the initial treatment for chronic pain due to addiction and adverse reactions | 1B |
Opioid transdermal patch should not be used in the treatment of acute or breakthrough pain | 1A |
When other first-line treatment drugs are ineffective, 8% capsaicin patch can be considered for chronic pain related to peripheral neuropathic pain | 1B |
When other first-line treatment drugs are ineffective, 5% lidocaine patch can be considered for chronic pain related to peripheral neuropathic pain | 2B |
- Citation: Ma K, Jiang W, Wang YX, Wang L, Lv Y, Liu JF, Liu RG, Liu H, Xiao LZ, Du DP, Lu LJ, Yang XQ, Xia LJ, Huang D, Fu ZJ, Peng BG, Liu YQ. Expert consensus of the Chinese Association for the Study of Pain on pain treatment with the transdermal patch. World J Clin Cases 2021; 9(9): 2110-2122
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2307-8960/full/v9/i9/2110.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v9.i9.2110