Ma K, Jiang W, Wang YX, Wang L, Lv Y, Liu JF, Liu RG, Liu H, Xiao LZ, Du DP, Lu LJ, Yang XQ, Xia LJ, Huang D, Fu ZJ, Peng BG, Liu YQ. Expert consensus of the Chinese Association for the Study of Pain on pain treatment with the transdermal patch. World J Clin Cases 2021; 9(9): 2110-2122 [PMID: 33850930 DOI: 10.12998/wjcc.v9.i9.2110]
Corresponding Author of This Article
Ke Ma, PhD, Chief Doctor, Department of Algology, Xinhua Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, No. 1665 Kongjiang Road, Yangpu District, Shanghai 200092, China. marke72@163.com
Research Domain of This Article
Pharmacology & Pharmacy
Article-Type of This Article
Expert Consensus
Open-Access Policy of This Article
This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
World J Clin Cases. Mar 26, 2021; 9(9): 2110-2122 Published online Mar 26, 2021. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v9.i9.2110
Table 1 Advantages of transdermal drug delivery system administration
Advantages
Simple administration and improved patient compliance
Avoids hepatic first pass metabolism
Avoids direct interaction of drugs with food or other drugs in the gastrointestinal tract, which may affect drug absorption
Helps in controlled drug delivery and reduces frequency of dosing
Reduces dosage and side effects
Can be removed from the skin surface immediately
Has physical form, characteristics and identification marks so that it can be easily and quickly identified in an emergency (such as when the patient is unresponsive, unconscious or comatose)
Table 2 Factors influencing drug percutaneous absorption[10,12]
Influencing factor
Effect on transdermal drug absorption
Drug concentration
Generally, the amount of drug absorbed per unit area per unit time increases with the increase in TDDS drug concentration
Drug distribution coefficient
Drugs with both water-soluble and fat-soluble properties can be effectively absorbed through the skin. The water-soluble properties of drugs determine the concentration of the drug at the absorption site and the partition coefficient affects the rate of drug transport at the absorption site
Drug molecular weight
The ideal relative molecular weight for transdermal administration is 400 Da or less
Carrier factor
The main effects of carriers on percutaneous absorption include solubility of drugs in carriers and change of drug distribution coefficient by carrier
Site of application and time
The larger the application area (TDDS) and the longer the application time, the more the drugs are absorbed
Skin conditions
Hydration of skin helps increase percutaneous absorption. TDDS can form a closed water barrier with evaporating sweat to increase the hydration degree of the skin. It can be applied to the thin cuticle, with better absorption through the skin. When the skin is damaged, the drug will directly enter the subcutaneous tissue and capillaries, which may affect the properties of TDDS
The drug should have suitable properties (highly potency, low molecular weight and lipophilic) to solve the problem of low oral bioavailability, to reduce the frequency of drug administration or to achieve stable drug administration
Second-generation transdermal patch
This generation of patch can promote and improve the percutaneous absorption of small molecule drugs by means of a chemical penetration enhancer, ion introduction or ultrasound
Third-generation transdermal patch
These patches help to promote percutaneous absorption of macromolecules, including therapeutic proteins and vaccines
Table 4 Pharmacokinetic characteristics of topical nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs patches[23-29]
Loxoprofen sodium
Ketoprofen
Diclofenac sodium
Flurbiprofen
Indometacin
Ibuprofen
Log P value
1.97
2.94
4.31
3.81
4.42
3.51
Cmax in ng/mL
61.20
891.36
0.81
43.00
27.00
556.00
Tmax in h
82.30
7.60
16.90
20.00
16.00
14.40
T1/2 in h
7.8
NA
NA
13.90
11.55
NA
Table 5 Pharmacology of fentanyl and buprenorphine transdermal patches[48-52]
Fentanyl transdermal patch
Buprenorphine transdermal patch
Absorption
Bioavailability, 92%; Plasma protein binding, 79%-87%; Cmax, 2.6 μg/L; Effective time, 12.7-16.6 h; Peak time 38.1 h; AUC, 117 μg/L; H (0-72 h)
Bioavailability, 50%; Plasma protein binding, 96%; Cmax, 305 pg/mL; Onset time 21 h; Peak time, about 60 h; AUC, 20228 pg/mL
Metabolism
Metabolized by CYP3A4 in the liver, and the metabolites are basically inactive
Metabolized by CYP3A4 in the liver
Elimination
The half-life of the transdermal patch is about 17 h (13-22 h)
Table 6 Quality classification and definition of grade evidence
Quality level
Definition
High (a)
Very sure that the true effect value is close to the effect value estimation
Medium (b)
There is a moderate degree of confidence in the value of effect; the real effect value may be close to the estimated value, but there is still a possibility that the two are not the same
Low (c)
There is limited confidence in the effect estimates; the true effect values may not be the same as the effect estimates
Very low (d)
There is little confidence in the estimated effect; the true effect value may be quite different from the effect estimate
Table 7 Grade recommended strength classification and definition
Recommended strength
Explanation
Expression method
Expression method
Strong recommendations to support the use of an intervention
The advantages of the intervention measures outweigh the disadvantages
Recommended
1
Weak recommendations to support the use of an intervention
Interventions may have more advantages than disadvantages
Recommended use
2
Weak recommendations against the use of an intervention
Interventions may do more harm than good or the relationship between the advantages and disadvantages is not clear
Not recommended
2
Strong recommendations against the use of an intervention
The disadvantages of the intervention measures are obviously greater than the advantages
Not recommended
1
Table 8 Consensus statement of Chinese experts on pain treatment with transdermal patch
Consensus opinion
Recommended strength level of evidence
The effect of the transdermal patch in pain treatment is clear. It has the advantages of reducing adverse drug reactions and improving patient compliance
1A
NSAID transdermal patch is effective in the treatment of chronic skeletal muscle pain with few side effects, which is recommended as the first choice for the treatment of chronic musculoskeletal pain
1A
NSAIDs can be used as a combination therapy for neuropathic pain
2C
When the efficacy of transdermal NSAIDs alone is not good enough, which can be combined with analgesic drugs of another administration route, such as oral NSAIDs
2B
Opioid transdermal patch is effective in the treatment of chronic pain, but it should not be used as the initial treatment for chronic pain due to addiction and adverse reactions
1B
Opioid transdermal patch should not be used in the treatment of acute or breakthrough pain
1A
When other first-line treatment drugs are ineffective, 8% capsaicin patch can be considered for chronic pain related to peripheral neuropathic pain
1B
When other first-line treatment drugs are ineffective, 5% lidocaine patch can be considered for chronic pain related to peripheral neuropathic pain
2B
Citation: Ma K, Jiang W, Wang YX, Wang L, Lv Y, Liu JF, Liu RG, Liu H, Xiao LZ, Du DP, Lu LJ, Yang XQ, Xia LJ, Huang D, Fu ZJ, Peng BG, Liu YQ. Expert consensus of the Chinese Association for the Study of Pain on pain treatment with the transdermal patch. World J Clin Cases 2021; 9(9): 2110-2122