Copyright
©The Author(s) 2021.
World J Clin Cases. Nov 16, 2021; 9(32): 9792-9803
Published online Nov 16, 2021. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v9.i32.9792
Published online Nov 16, 2021. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v9.i32.9792
Table 1 Baseline and clinical characteristics
| Mutant EGFR group (n = 31) | Wild-type group (n = 67) | P value | |
| Age (yr) | 66.6 ± 14.2 | 62.7 ± 15.6 | 0.221 |
| < 60 | 13 (41.9%) | 37 (55.2%) | |
| ≥ 60 | 18 (58.1%) | 30 (44.8%) | |
| Male | 12 (38.7%) | 30 (44.8%) | 0.573 |
| Smoking history | 8 (25.8%) | 24 (35.8%) | 0.326 |
| Nodule property | 0.372 | ||
| Pure GGNs | 7 (22.6%) | 21 (31.3%) | |
| Partial solid nodules | 24 (77.4%) | 46 (68.7%) | |
| Histopathologic diagnosis | 0.723 | ||
| Preinvasive lesions (AAH + AIS) | 5 (16.1%) | 9 (13.4%) | |
| Invasive lesions (MIA + IPA) | 26 (83.9%) | 58 (86.6%) | |
| Position of the nodule | 0.471 | ||
| Right upper lobe | 10 (32.3%) | 27 (40.3%) | |
| Right middle lobe | 4 (12.9%) | 8 (11.9%) | |
| Right lower lobe | 6 (19.4%) | 9 (13.4%) | |
| Left upper lobe | 5 (16.1%) | 17 (25.4%) | |
| Left lower lobe | 6 (19.4%) | 6 (9.0%) | |
| Time between CT scan and surgery (days) | 7.0 (4.5, 13.5) | 8.0 (6.0, 13.0) | 0.545 |
Table 2 High-resolution computerized tomography signs
| HRCT findings | Mutant EGFR group (n = 31) | Wild-type group (n = 67) | P value |
| Nodule size (mm) | 17.19 ± 6.79 | 14.37 ± 6.30 | 0.047a |
| Pure GGNs | |||
| Nodule size (mm) | 12.79 ± 5.24 | 9.24 ± 3.26 | 0.042a |
| Partial solid nodules | |||
| Nodule size (mm) | 18.63 ± 6.47 | 16.68 ± 6.05 | 0.216 |
| Proportion of ground-glass component (%) | 56.10 ± 24.01 | 51.05 ± 28.13 | 0.457 |
| Nodule morphology | 0.137 | ||
| Round-like/ovoid | 14 (45.2%) | 41 (61.2%) | |
| Irregular | 17 (54.8%) | 26 (38.8%) | |
| Spicules on the edge of the nodule | 20 (64.5%) | 34 (50.7%) | 0.202 |
| Lobules on the border of the nodule | 29 (93.5%) | 61 (91.0%) | 1.000 |
| Vacuole/honeycomb sign | 25 (80.6%) | 36 (53.7%) | 0.011a |
| Pleural indentation | 20 (64.5%) | 33 (49.3%) | 0.159 |
| Relationship with bronchus/bronchovascular bundles | 0.613 | ||
| Bronchus truncated in the nodule | 1 (3.2%) | 6 (9.0%) | |
| Bronchus continuous in the nodule, with dilation or twisted appearance | 11 (35.5%) | 20 (29.9%) | |
| Bronchus continuous in the nodule, without dilation or twisted appearance | 7 (22.6%) | 11 (16.4%) | |
| Bronchus not associated with ground-glass shadows | 12 (38.7%) | 30 (44.8%) | |
| Relationship with blood vessels | 0.488 | ||
| Blood vessels closely packed around the nodule with adherent-like pattern | 0 (0.0%) | 3 (4.5%) | |
| Blood vessels closely packed within the nodule | 20 (64.5%) | 41 (61.2%) | |
| Vascular clustering around the nodule | 11 (35.5%) | 23 (34.3%) |
Table 3 Logistic regression analysis for the presence of epidermal growth factor receptor mutations
Table 4 Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of the models
- Citation: Zhu P, Xu XJ, Zhang MM, Fan SF. High-resolution computed tomography findings independently predict epidermal growth factor receptor mutation status in ground-glass nodular lung adenocarcinoma. World J Clin Cases 2021; 9(32): 9792-9803
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2307-8960/full/v9/i32/9792.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v9.i32.9792
