Pang B, Pan JJ, Li Q, Zhang X. Accuracy of ultrasonography in diagnosis of fetal central nervous system malformation. World J Clin Cases 2021; 9(27): 8027-8034 [PMID: 34621859 DOI: 10.12998/wjcc.v9.i27.8027]
Corresponding Author of This Article
Xia Zhang, MHSc, Chief Physician, Department of Ultrasound, The First Affiliated Hospital of Wannan Medical College, No. 2 Zheshan West Road, Wuhu 241000, Anhui Province, China. yjsusd@163.com
Research Domain of This Article
Radiology, Nuclear Medicine & Medical Imaging
Article-Type of This Article
Retrospective Study
Open-Access Policy of This Article
This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
World J Clin Cases. Sep 26, 2021; 9(27): 8027-8034 Published online Sep 26, 2021. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v9.i27.8027
Table 1 Comparison of image quality scores between two-dimensional ultrasonography and three-dimensional ultrasonography (mean ± SD, points)
Group
Number
Sulcus, fissure, and gyrus display
Choroid plexus ependymal display
Blood flow display
Tissue specificity
Resolution
Visual field
Positioning
Two-dimensional ultrasonography
113
2.53 ± 0.34
2.49 ± 0.23
2.38 ± 0.30
2.44 ± 0.25
2.59 ± 0.18
2.63 ± 0.21
2.85 ± 0.12
Three-dimensional ultrasonography
113
1.97 ± 0.30
2.12 ± 0.25
1.98 ± 0.26
2.03 ± 0.20
2.31 ± 0.22
2.25 ± 0.19
2.61 ± 0.14
t
13.129
11.578
10.711
13.613
10.471
14.264
13.836
P value
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
Table 2 Analysis of diagnoses by two-dimensional ultrasonography and three-dimensional ultrasonography
Inspection mode
Results of pathological examination
Total
+
-
Two-dimensional ultrasonography examination
+
51
8
59
-
28
26
54
Three-dimensional ultrasonography examination
+
73
4
77
-
6
30
36
Total
79
34
113
Table 3 Diagnostic performance of two-dimensional ultrasonography and three-dimensional ultrasonography diagnosis
Diagnostic mode
Diagnostic sensitivity
Diagnostic specificity
Diagnostic accuracy
Two-dimensional ultrasonography examination
64.56% (51/79)
76.47% (26/34)
68.14% (77/113)
Three-dimensional ultrasonography examination
92.41% (73/79)
88.24% (30/34)
91.15% (103/113)
χ2
18.139
1.619
18.451
P value
0.000
0.203
0.000
Table 4 Analysis of different types of central nervous system malformations detected by two-dimensional and three-dimensional ultrasonography
Diagnostic mode
Brain perforation malformation
Abnormality of corpus callosum
Meningoencephalocele
Choroidal cyst
Exposed brain malformation
Galen venous hemangioma
Arachnoid cyst
Spina bifida
Hydrocephalus
Two-dimensional ultrasonography examination
50.00% (2/4)
50.00% (2/4)
60.00% (3/5)
57.14% (4/7)
77.78% (7/9)
72.73% (8/11)
58.33% (7/12)
61.54% (8/13)
71.43% (10/14)
Three-dimensional ultrasonography examination
100.00% (4/4)
75.00% (3/4)
100.00% (5/5)
85.71% (6/7)
88.89% (8/9)
100.00% (11/11)
91.67% (11/12)
92.31% (12/13)
92.86% (13/14)
χ2
2.667
0.533
2.500
1.400
0.400
3.474
3.556
3.467
2.191
P value
0.102
0.465
0.114
0.237
0.527
0.062
0.059
0.063
0.139
Citation: Pang B, Pan JJ, Li Q, Zhang X. Accuracy of ultrasonography in diagnosis of fetal central nervous system malformation. World J Clin Cases 2021; 9(27): 8027-8034