Copyright
©The Author(s) 2021.
World J Clin Cases. Jun 26, 2021; 9(18): 4573-4584
Published online Jun 26, 2021. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v9.i18.4573
Published online Jun 26, 2021. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v9.i18.4573
Table 1 Some major fields in the prenatal down syndrome screening and postnatal follow-up database
S/N | Date of receipt | Pregnant mother number | Sample number |
Date of birth | Blood sampling date | Expected age at delivery | T21 age riskvalue |
T18 age risk | AFP MoM1 | hCGb MoM | uE3 MoM |
AFP concentration2 | hCGb concentration | uE3 concentration | Gestational age |
Body weight | Examination unit | Date of last menstruation | Ethnicity/race |
Menstrual cycle | History of abnormal pregnancy | Smoking status | CRL3 |
BPD4 | NT5 | Fetal chromosomal karyotype | Pregnancy outcomes |
Table 2 Some data samples used for feature selection
ID | Expected age at delivery | AFP concentration | hCGb concentration | uE3 concentration | Body weight | Gestational age | Result |
783 | 19.633 | 23.22 | 30.71 | 5.35 | 60.7 | 17.6 | 1 |
1504 | 39.403 | 44.1 | 30.41 | 3.87 | 62 | 16.4 | 1 |
4338 | 30.527 | 23.73 | 26.29 | 5.86 | 65 | 18.5 | 1 |
6050 | 34.489 | 11.53 | 52.42 | 9.8 | 52.5 | 20.6 | 1 |
6412 | 41.966 | 24.51 | 49.67 | 3.91 | 58 | 19 | 1 |
Table 3 Experimental results
Algorithm | DR | FPR | Time |
CART+AdaBoost | 0.2941 | 0.2857 | 0:09:54 |
SVM+SMOTE-Tomek | 1 | 0.0183 | 0:09:01 |
CART+AdaBoost+SMOTE-Tomek,maxdepth=2,iter=100 | 0.9777 | 0.2337 | 0:02:14 |
CART+AdaBoost+SMOTE-Tomek,maxdepth=2,iter=500 | 0.9909 | 0.1382 | 07:18.0 |
CART+AdaBoost+SMOTE-Tomek,maxdepth=5,iter=100 | 0.9987 | 0.0102 | 0:03:15 |
CART+AdaBoost+SMOTE-Tomek,maxdepth=5,iter=500 | 0.9993 | 0.0028 | 0:11:37 |
SVM+EasyEnsemble | 1 | 0.9973 | 0.00348 |
SVM+ADASYN | 0.9863 | 0.0932 | 0:11:05 |
Table 4 Comparison of algorithms when different T21 threshold values were selected
Risk-cutoff value | Age | SVM | Statistical methods | ||
FPR | DR | FPR | DR | ||
270 | Overall | 0.009369 | 0.9295 | 0.032 | 0.913 |
50 | Overall | 0.003081 | 0.913 | 0.007 | 0.82 |
150 | Overall | 0.007039 | 0.9268 | 0.019 | 0.885 |
250 | Overall | 0.008197 | 0.9178 | 0.03 | 0.91 |
500 | Overall | 0.01775 | 0.9266 | 0.053 | 0.937 |
750 | Overall | 0.02299 | 0.9319 | 0.072 | 0.95 |
1000 | Overall | 0.03321 | 0.9305 | 0.088 | 0.958 |
- Citation: Zhang HG, Jiang YT, Dai SD, Li L, Hu XN, Liu RZ. Application of intelligent algorithms in Down syndrome screening during second trimester pregnancy. World J Clin Cases 2021; 9(18): 4573-4584
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2307-8960/full/v9/i18/4573.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v9.i18.4573