Copyright
©The Author(s) 2021.
World J Clin Cases. Jan 6, 2021; 9(1): 91-101
Published online Jan 6, 2021. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v9.i1.91
Published online Jan 6, 2021. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v9.i1.91
Table 1 Chi-squared test of delivery modes and delivery durations between the 2 groups
Table 2 Comparison of multiple factors between patients with or without diastasis of the pubic symphysis
Variables | Control group | Observational group | t | P value |
Relaxin concentration (µg/mL) | 170.435 ± 42.299 | 122.380 ± 0.729 | 3.245 | 0.002 |
Weight of baby (g) | 3676.000 ± 521.725 | 3379.487 ± 402.420 | 2.229 | 0.03 |
Gestational age (wk) | 39.809 ± 0.839 | 39.105 ± 1.258 | 1.998 | 0.051 |
Age at delivery (yr) | 29.667 ± 4.271 | 30.795 ± 4.964 | −0.776 | 0.441 |
Pre-pregnancy weight | 75.467 ± 8.269 | 76.731 ± 10.807 | −0.408 | 0.685 |
Weight gain during pregnancy | 18.643 ± 2.706 | 17.716 ± 4.759 | 0.685 | 0.497 |
First stage of labor (min) | 359 ± 134.346 | 374.25 ± 122.553 | −0.311 | 0.758 |
Second stage of labor (min) | 54.70 ± 43.16 | 45.80 ± 39.325 | 0.566 | 0.576 |
Table 3 Multivariate regression analysis of parturients with pubic symphysis diastasis
B | Standard error | Wald test quantity | Degrees of freedom | P value | OR | |
Weight of baby (kg) | 0.002 | 0.001 | 4.107 | 1 | 0.043 | 1.002 |
Relaxin concentration (µg/mL) | 0.022 | 0.008 | 8.075 | 1 | 0.004 | 1.022 |
−10.508 | 3.673 | 8.183 | 1 | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Table 4 Comparison of multiple factors between pregnant and postpartum parturients in the observational group
Pregnancy diastasis | Postpartum diastasis | t | P value | |
Relaxin content (µg/mL) | 162.049 ± 43.178 | 177.774 ± 42.994 | -0.705 | 0.493 |
Diastatic gap (cm) | 1.285 ± 0.458 | 2.168 ± 1.151 | -1.896 | 0.08 |
Weight of baby (g) | 3807.143 ± 440.519 | 3561.250 ± 588.058 | 0.905 | 0.382 |
Gestational age (wk) | 39.754 ± 0.837 | 39.858 ± 0.896 | -0.229 | 0.822 |
Age at delivery (yr) | 30 ± 3.559 | 29.375 ± 5.041 | 0.273 | 0.789 |
Pre-pregnancy weight | 78.500 ± 8.646 | 72.813 ± 7.445 | 1.370 | 0.194 |
Weight gain during pregnancy | 18.5 ± 2.345 | 18.75 ± 3.105 | -0.165 | 0.872 |
First stage of labor (min) | 282.50 ± 173.241 | 378.13 ± 129.723 | -0.890 | 0.400 |
Second stage of labor (min) | 83.50 ± 94.045 | 47.50 ± 28.909 | 1.063 | 0.319 |
Table 5 Multivariate linear regression of the degree of diastasis
Unstandardized coefficient | Standardization coefficient | t | P value | Collinear statistics | |||
B | Standard error | Beta | Tolerance | Variance inflation factor | |||
Variables | -8.200 | 29.024 | -0.283 | 0.825 | |||
Gestational age (wk) | 0.653 | 0.695 | 0.477 | 0.939 | 0.520 | 0.361 | 2.772 |
Age at delivery (yr) | -0.137 | 0.111 | -0.562 | -1.238 | 0.433 | 0.451 | 2.215 |
Pre-pregnancy weight | -0.077 | 0.103 | -0.601 | -0.744 | 0.593 | 0.143 | 7.008 |
Baby weight (kg) | 0.000 | 0.002 | -0.136 | -0.170 | 0.893 | 0.146 | 6.859 |
First stage of labor (min) | -0.001 | 0.006 | -0.150 | -0.200 | 0.874 | 0.167 | 6.002 |
Second stage of labor (min) | 0.000 | 0.010 | 0.008 | 0.020 | 0.987 | 0.560 | 1.786 |
Relaxin content (µg/mL) | 0.013 | 0.014 | 0.494 | 0.928 | 0.524 | 0.327 | 3.056 |
Weight gain during pregnancy | 0.366 | 0.175 | -0.938 | -2.098 | 0.283 | 0.465 | 2.151 |
Table 6 Analysis of the correlation between the levels of relaxin and other factors
Gestational age (wk) | Age at delivery (yr) | Pre-pregnancy weight (kg) | Weight gain during pregnancy (kg) | Neonatal weight (g) | Delivery duration | ||
Relaxin level | Pearson’s correlation coefficient | 0.145 | 0.118 | −0.081 | 0.012 | 0.002 | 0.034 |
P value | 0.301 | 0.339 | 0.563 | 0.931 | 0.986 | 0.808 |
Table 7 Analysis of the correlation between the degree of separation and Barthel index and visual analog scale score
Barthel index | Visual analog scale | ||
Degree of separation | Pearson’s correlation coefficient | −0.828 | 0.960 |
P value | 0.000 | 0.000 |
- Citation: Wang Y, Li YQ, Tian MR, Wang N, Zheng ZC. Role of relaxin in diastasis of the pubic symphysis peripartum. World J Clin Cases 2021; 9(1): 91-101
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2307-8960/full/v9/i1/91.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v9.i1.91