Copyright
©The Author(s) 2020.
World J Clin Cases. Apr 26, 2020; 8(8): 1414-1423
Published online Apr 26, 2020. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v8.i8.1414
Published online Apr 26, 2020. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v8.i8.1414
Table 1 Demographics and laboratory characteristics of study cohort
Parameters | Group A (without stones) | Group B (with stones) |
Number of patients | 121 | 33 |
Age (yr) (mean ± SD) | 54.8 ± 18.8 | 68.9 ± 14.3 |
Gender, n (%) | ||
Male | 57 (47) | 11 (33.3) |
Female | 64 (53) | 22 (66.7) |
Alanine aminotransferase, U/L | 171.9 ± 238.9 | 363.3 ± 347 |
Aspartate transaminase, U/L | 170.7 ± 267.4 | 387.7 ± 290.5 |
Alkaline phosphatase, U/L | 143.6 ± 122.1 | 246.7 ± 133.1 |
Gamma-glutamyltransferase, U/L | 291.1 ± 284 | 594.4 ± 385.2 |
Total bilirubin, mg/dL | 2.2 ± 5.2 | 3.4 ± 2.6 |
White blood cells (× 103/cm) | 11.6 ± 4.5 | 12.7 ± 4.7 |
Common bile duct width by US (mm) | 6.4 ± 1.6 | 7.3 ± 2.9 |
Table 2 Univariate analysis of parameters associated with common bile duct stones
Parameter | Odds ratio | Lower 95% confidence limit for odds ratio | Upper 95% confidence limit for odds ratio | P value |
Age | 1.048 | 1.021 | 1.076 | 0.0004 |
Gender, male vs female | 0.573 | 0.258 | 1.276 | 0.1728 |
Aspartate transaminase | 1.002 | 1.001 | 1.004 | 0.0015 |
Alkaline phosphatase | 1.005 | 1.002 | 1.008 | 0.0005 |
Gamma-glutamyltransferase | 1.003 | 1.001 | 1.004 | 0.0002 |
Total bilirubin | 1.033 | 0.964 | 1.108 | 0.3515 |
White blood cells | 1.052 | 0.970 | 1.142 | 0.2190 |
Common bile duct width by US (mm) | 1.187 | 1.004 | 1.402 | 0.0445 |
Common bile duct dilation by US | 4.032 | 1.601 | 10.153 | 0.0031 |
Table 3 Variables that were independently associated with common bile duct stones and their corresponding weight points given according to coefficient estimates
Parameters | Coefficient estimate | Odds ratio (95%CI) | P value | Weights appointed for the score |
Age | 0.05 ± 0.01 | 1.061 (1.026-1.097) | 0.0005 | × 0.5 |
Dilated common bile duct by US | 1.3 ± 0.058 | 3.685 (1.160-11.711) | 0.0270 | × 10 |
Gamma-glutamyltransferase (U/L) | 0.002 ± 0.0007 | 1.003 (1.001-1.004) | 0.0003 | × 0.02 |
Table 4 Equation generated cut-off points with their corresponding diagnostic statistics [age (yr) × 0.5 + gamma-glutamyl transferase (U/L) × 0.02 + common bile duct width by ultrasound (mm) × 10]
Score | Sensitivity | Specificity | PPV | NPV |
51-74 | 20-46 | 90-100 | 65-100 | 77-83 |
41-51 | 52-79 | 70-88 | 50-61 | 83-90 |
9-41 | 82-100 | 58-69 | 47-50 | 91-100 |
- Citation: Khoury T, Kadah A, Mahamid M, Mari A, Sbeit W. Bedside score predicting retained common bile duct stone in acute biliary pancreatitis. World J Clin Cases 2020; 8(8): 1414-1423
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2307-8960/full/v8/i8/1414.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v8.i8.1414