Copyright
©The Author(s) 2020.
World J Clin Cases. Feb 26, 2020; 8(4): 743-756
Published online Feb 26, 2020. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v8.i4.743
Published online Feb 26, 2020. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v8.i4.743
Table 1 Patient distribution by age and gender
| Number of patients | Age | Std. deviation | |
| Female | 33 | 13 yr, 11 mo | 1.33 |
| Male | 24 | 13 yr, 11 mo | 0.96 |
| Total | 57 | 13 yr, 11 mo | 1.16 |
Table 2 Descriptive statistics of procedure time in minutes (n = 84)
| Minimum | Maximum | mean ± SD | |
| Procedure time in minutes | 1.65 | 6.00 | 3.95 ± 1.43 |
| Valid N (listwise) | |||
Table 3 Mean and standard deviation of procedure time and stain size (%)
| Categorized stain (%) | Procedure time mean (min) | Procedure time (min, s) | n | Std. deviation |
| Small | 3.66’ | 3’40” | 24 | 1.64 |
| Medium-Sized | 4.08’ | 4’05” | 42 | 1.36 |
| Large | 4.03’ | 4’02” | 18 | 1.31 |
| Total | 3.95’ | 3’57” | 84 | 1.43 |
Table 4 Mean and standard deviation of enamel loss and stain size
| Stain size in mm2 | Mean enamel loss in microns (µm) | n | Std. deviation |
| Small | 234 | 24 | 110.5 |
| Medium-sized | 232 | 42 | 105.2 |
| Large | 239 | 18 | 106.5 |
| Total | 234 | 84 | 105.8 |
Table 5 Kruskal-Wallis statistical test grouping variable: categorized stain percentage and effectiveness percentage
| Mean effectiveness percentage | |
| χ2 | 4.3 |
| Df | 2 |
| Asymp. Sig. | 0.117 |
Table 6 Descriptive statistics by groups of stain size and effectiveness
| Categorized Stain percentage | Mean | n | Std. deviation | Minimum | Maximum | Median |
| Small | 93.3 | 24 | 14.14 | 52.18 | 100.00 | 100.00 |
| Medium | 89.2 | 42 | 14.54 | 54.30 | 100.00 | 98.90 |
| Large | 90.5 | 18 | 10.40 | 69.40 | 100.00 | 91.74 |
| Total | 90.6 | 84 | 13.61 | 52.18 | 100.00 | 100.00 |
Table 7 Nonparametric Kolmogorov-Smirnov test
| Enamel loss in μm | ||
| n | 84 | |
| Normal Parameters1,2 | Mean | 234.05 |
| Std. Deviation | 105.75 | |
| Most Extreme Differences | Absolute | 0.20 |
| Positive | 0.17 | |
| Negative | -0.20 | |
| Kolmogorov-Smirnov Z | 1.81 | |
| Asymp. Sig. (2-tailed) | 0.003 | |
Table 8 Mann-Whitney U statistical test for the variable categorized procedure time
| Enamel loss in μm | |
| Mann-Whitney U | 440.50 |
| Wilcoxon W | 1665.50 |
| Z | -3.88 |
| Asymp. Sig. (2-tailed) | 0.000 |
Table 9 Mean, minimum, maximum, median, and standard deviation of enamel loss and procedure time
| Enamel loss in μm | ||||||
| Categorized procedure time | Mean | n | Std. deviation | Minimum | Maximum | Median |
| 1 - 4.00 min | 196.12 | 49 | 100.76 | 100 | 450 | 200 |
| 4.01 – 6 min | 287.14 | 35 | 89.4 | 100 | 450 | 300 |
| Total | 234.05 | 84 | 105.75 | 100 | 450 | 225 |
- Citation: Nevárez-Rascón M, Molina-Frechero N, Adame E, Almeida E, Soto-Barreras U, Gaona E, Nevárez-Rascón A. Effectiveness of a microabrasion technique using 16% HCL with manual application on fluorotic teeth: A series of studies. World J Clin Cases 2020; 8(4): 743-756
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2307-8960/full/v8/i4/743.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v8.i4.743
