Copyright
©The Author(s) 2020.
World J Clin Cases. Dec 26, 2020; 8(24): 6282-6295
Published online Dec 26, 2020. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v8.i24.6282
Published online Dec 26, 2020. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v8.i24.6282
Table 1 Clinical data
Gender (M/F) | Age (yr) | Affected side (left/right) | Height (cm) | Weight (kg) | Course (d) | Brunnstrom stage (III/IV) | |
Experimental group | 8/8 | 50.00 ± 5.66 | 6/10 | 162.89 ± 7.55 | 65.78 ± 5.59 | 45.63 ± 8.09 | 4/12 |
Control group | 8/8 | 52.13 ± 6.77 | 8/8 | 168.13 ± 14.04 | 66.25 ± 5.82 | 41.88 ± 5.54 | 4/12 |
P value | 1.000 | 0.507 | 0.614 | 0.372 | 0.870 | 0.298 | 1.000 |
Table 2 Changes in step length, pace, and frequency before and after treatment
Parameter | Experimental group | Control group | ||
Before | After | Before | After | |
Step length (m) | 0.30 ± 0.14 | 0.39 ± 0.11a,c | 0.29 ± 0.08 | 0.33 ± 0.07a |
Step frequency (step/min) | 53.79 ± 7.45 | 98.02 ± 12.97b,d | 55.01 ± 10.08 | 77.85 ± 11.15b |
Step pace (m/s) | 0.31 ± 0.15 | 0.46 ± 0.13a,c | 0.30 ± 0.11 | 0.38 ± 0.10a |
Table 3 Changes in the lower limb joint angle and the displacement of center of mass before and after treatment
Parameter | Experimental group | Control group | ||
Before | After | Before | After | |
Ankle joint angle (°) | 17.81 ± 4.50 | 25.42 ± 4.85b,c | 18.83 ± 2.31 | 22.49 ± 3.38a |
Knee joint angle (°) | 34.72 ± 9.80 | 50.21 ± 14.34b,c | 34.82 ± 10.20 | 42.29 ± 11.12a |
Centre of gravity lateral displacement (left-right direction, cm) | 13.35 ± 3.16 | 8.15 ± 2.31b,c | 12.63 ± 2.87 | 9.97 ± 3.27a |
Table 4 Changes in the peak plantar pressure values (n)
Parameter | Experimental group | Control group | ||
Before | After | Before | After | |
1st phalange (AS) | 41.25 ± 5.09 | 49.75 ± 5.80b,c | 39.56 ± 5.78 | 43.75 ± 5.52a |
1st phalange (HS) | 59.88 ± 9.23 | 54.25 ± 6.50a | 58.25 ± 6.46 | 53.63 ± 11.51 |
Anterior foot (AS) | 442.89 ± 24.45 | 410.02 ± 26.72b,c | 439.01 ± 31.04 | 429.89 ± 28.35 |
Anterior foot (HS) | 496.78 ± 35.88 | 455.01 ± 31.77b,c | 495.14 ± 34.69 | 472.64 ± 31.93a |
Midfoot (AS) | 102.63 ± 8.57 | 96.38 ± 11.83 | 105.38 ± 12.75 | 100.88 ± 10.66 |
Midfoot (HS) | 125.50 ± 15.41 | 115.75 ± 16.37 | 129.13 ± 17.13 | 127.25 ± 16.46 |
Medial heel (AS) | 160.38 ± 22.25 | 137.25 ± 13.38b,d | 164.25 ± 16.83 | 153.13 ± 14.00a |
Medial heel (HS) | 184.88 ± 15.63 | 166.63 ± 14.38b,c | 191.00 ± 20.29 | 178.63 ± 16.94a |
Lateral heel (AS) | 190.25 ± 16.57 | 168.63 ± 10.11b,d | 196.88 ± 13.08 | 182.63 ± 14.29b |
Lateral heel (HS) | 226.25 ± 15.00 | 203.88 ± 13.38b,c | 232.25 ± 13.83 | 222.50 ± 18.51 |
Table 5 Impulse changes in different foot regions (N· S)
Parameter | Experimental group | Control group | ||
Before | After | Before | After | |
1st phalange (AS) | 13.41 ± 3.36 | 24.67 ± 6.27b,d | 11.19 ± 5.11 | 14.68 ± 5.66a |
1st phalange (HS) | 34.85 ± 4.22 | 29.28 ± 4.04a | 32.61 ± 5.04 | 27.80 ± 5.19 |
Anterior foot (AS) | 222.54 ± 22.34 | 259.24 ± 24.02b,d | 215.21 ± 23.80 | 239.07 ± 22.97a |
Anterior foot (HS) | 269.11 ± 27.88 | 235.20 ± 32.56b,d | 282.45 ± 31.87 | 257.73 ± 30.21b |
Midfoot (AS) | 60.14 ± 15.49 | 72.08 ± 8.78 | 53.65 ± 14.52 | 60.31 ± 14.75 |
Midfoot (HS) | 82.54 ± 10.97 | 77.51 ± 12.75 | 74.98 ± 13.64 | 73.64 ± 14.71 |
Medial heel (AS) | 93.13 ± 10.16 | 85.08 ± 9.81b,c | 100.44 ± 10.93 | 97.16 ± 12.31 |
Medial heel (HS) | 113.30 ± 13.01 | 97.11 ± 14.51b,c | 118.03 ± 10.86 | 110.34 ± 11.69a |
Lateral heel (AS) | 118.04 ± 11.29 | 108.55 ± 11.28b,c | 122.51 ± 9.77 | 116.38 ± 8.49a |
Lateral heel (HS) | 134.64 ± 17.12 | 119.58 ± 15.90b,c | 140.10 ± 14.48 | 130.36 ± 11.91a |
- Citation: Lou YT, Yang JJ, Ma YF, Zhen XC. Effects of different acupuncture methods combined with routine rehabilitation on gait of stroke patients. World J Clin Cases 2020; 8(24): 6282-6295
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2307-8960/full/v8/i24/6282.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v8.i24.6282