Copyright
©The Author(s) 2020.
World J Clin Cases. Nov 26, 2020; 8(22): 5518-5528
Published online Nov 26, 2020. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v8.i22.5518
Published online Nov 26, 2020. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v8.i22.5518
Table 1 Pharmacokinetics parameters of test and reference formulations of esomeprazole under fasting status (pharmacokinetics analysis set)
PK parameters (unit) | mean ± SD (CV%), 1n = 32 | |||
2n | Test formulation | 2n | Reference formulation | |
Cmax (ng/mL) | 64 | 1709.563 ± 650.8205 (38.07%) | 64 | 1635.875 ± 591.2969 (36.15%) |
AUC0-t (hr*ng/mL) | 64 | 4328.5196 ± 2109.6280 (48.74%) | 64 | 4132.7124 ± 1991.9727 (48.20%) |
AUC0-inf (hr*ng/mL) | 64 | 4395.5223 ± 2173.2633 (49.44%) | 64 | 4187.7795 ± 2046.3196 (48.86%) |
Tmax (h) | 64 | 2.000 (1.00, 4.00) | 64 | 2.500 (1.00, 5.00) |
%AUCex | 64 | 1.135 ± 1.8793 (165.54%) | 64 | 1.040 ± 1.1709 (112.60%) |
λz (1/h) | 64 | 0.5685 ± 0.1969 (34.64%) | 64 | 0.5757 ± 0.1967 (34.16%) |
t1/2 (h) | 64 | 1.366 ± 0.4855 (35.53%) | 64 | 1.329 ± 0.3972 (29.89%) |
CL/F (L/h) | 64 | 12.3599 ± 8.6012 (69.59%) | 64 | 13.2105 ± 9.5635 (72.39%) |
Vd/F (L) | 64 | 20.3287 ± 6.4901 (31.93%) | 64 | 21.3166 ± 8.6636 (40.64%) |
Table 2 Pharmacokinetics parameters of test and reference formulations of esomeprazole under fed status (pharmacokinetics analysis set)
PK parameters (unit) | mean ± SD (CV%), 1n = 32 | |||
2n | Test formulation | 2n | Control formulation | |
Cmax (ng/mL) | 64 | 360.373 ± 249.7500 (69.30%) | 64 | 390.725 ± 257.6718 (65.95%) |
AUC0-t (hr*ng/mL) | 64 | 1285.9846 ± 965.7697 (75.10%) | 64 | 1363.9129 ± 887.0435 (65.04%) |
AUC0-inf (hr*ng/mL) | 63 | 1366.4590 ± 1014.866 (74.27%) | 58 | 1497.9755 ± 979.5204 (65.39%) |
Tmax (h) | 64 | 5.000 (2.00, 8.00) | 64 | 5.000 (3.00, 10.00) |
%AUCex | 63 | 4.154 ± 6.7878 (163.39%) | 58 | 4.191 ± 5.6377 (134.53%) |
λz (1/h) | 63 | 0.5766 ± 0.1851 (32.11%) | 58 | 0.5529 ± 0.1602 (28.98%) |
t1/2 (h) | 63 | 1.454 ± 0.9882 (67.97%) | 58 | 1.408 ± 0.5896 (41.89%) |
CL/F (L/h) | 63 | 54.4431 ± 60.2376 (110.64%) | 58 | 47.2423 ± 47.5796 (100.71%) |
Vd/F (L) | 63 | 101.5421 ± 111.3586 (109.67%) | 58 | 93.9881 ± 113.9048 (121.19%) |
Table 3 Bioequivalence analysis of esomeprazole (fasting arm)–primary endpoint pharmacokinetics parameters (bioequivalence analysis set)
Average bioequivalence | Reference-scaled average bioequivalence | Intra-subject variability (%) | |||||||||
Parameters | n | GLSmean T | GLSmean R | Ratio (%) (T vs R) | 90%CI (%) | S2wr | Swr | Point estimate (0.8, 1.25) | Criteria bound (≤ 0) | CVwt | CVwr |
Cmax (ng/mL) | 32 | 1591.275 | 1527.891 | 104.15 | (98.20, 110.46) | 0.0427 | 0.2067 | 1.0415 | -0.0193 | 15.04 | 20.89 |
AUC0-t (h*ng/mL) | 32 | 3786.532 | 3597.451 | 105.26 | (99.80, 111.01) | 0.0484 | 0.2199 | 1.0526 | -0.0228 | 18.39 | 22.26 |
AUC0-inf (h*ng/mL) | 32 | 3830.746 | 3635.508 | 105.37 | (99.97, 111.06) | 0.0473 | 0.2175 | 1.0537 | -0.0222 | 18.31 | 22.01 |
Table 4 Bioequivalence analysis of esomeprazole (fed arm) – primary endpoint pharmacokinetics parameters (bioequivalence analysis set)
Average bioequivalence | Reference-scaled average bioequivalence | Intra-subject variability (%) | |||||||||
Parameters | n | GLSmean T | GLSmean R | Ratio (%) (T vs R) | 90%CI (%) | S2wr | Swr | Point estimate (0.8, 1.25) | Criteria bound (≤ 0) | CVwt | CVwr |
Cmax(ng/mL) | 32 | 284.060 | 298.718 | 95.09 | (80.92, 111.75) | 0.3238 | 0.5690 | 0.9509 | -0.1689 | 53.05 | 61.84 |
AUC0-t (h*ng/mL) | 32 | 958.8895 | 1065.110 | 90.03 | (79.29, 102.22) | 0.2281 | 0.4776 | 0.9003 | -0.1015 | 39.91 | 50.62 |
AUC0-inf (h*ng/mL) | 26 | 1074.615 | 1271.273 | 84.53 | (72.99, 97.90) | 0.2260 | 0.4754 | 0.8453 | -0.0593 | 42.76 | 50.36 |
- Citation: Liu ZZ, Ren Q, Zhou YN, Yang HM. Bioequivalence of two esomeprazole magnesium enteric-coated formulations in healthy Chinese subjects. World J Clin Cases 2020; 8(22): 5518-5528
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2307-8960/full/v8/i22/5518.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v8.i22.5518