Copyright
©The Author(s) 2020.
World J Clin Cases. Nov 6, 2020; 8(21): 5213-5220
Published online Nov 6, 2020. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v8.i21.5213
Published online Nov 6, 2020. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v8.i21.5213
Table 1 Comparison of baseline data between the transitional nursing group and general nursing group
Baseline data | Transitional nursing group, n = 41 | General nursing group, n = 41 | χ2/t | P value |
Gender, n (%) | 0.120 | 0.729 | ||
Male | 23 (56.10) | 22 (53.66) | ||
Female | 18 (43.90) | 19 (46.34) | ||
Household registration | 0.119 | 0.730 | ||
Urban | 20 (48.78) | 19 (46.34) | ||
Rural | 21 (51.22) | 22 (53.66) | ||
Age in yr | 8.66 ± 1.05 | 8.72 ± 1.08 | 0.383 | 0.703 |
Course of disease in d | 11.52 ± 1.32 | 11.67 ± 1.39 | 0.501 | 0.618 |
Weight in kg | 26.24 ± 4.14 | 26.31 ± 4.08 | 0.077 | 0.939 |
Body mass index in kg/m2 | 23.15 ± 1.58 | 23.01 ± 1.47 | 0.415 | 0.679 |
Table 2 Comparison of exercise of self-care agency scores between the two groups, mean ± standard deviation, score
Group | Transitional nursing group, n = 41 | General nursing group, n = 41 | t | P value |
Self-care responsibility | 26.31 ± 4.58 | 20.16 ± 3.97 | 6.497 | 0.001 |
Self-concept | 25.14 ± 3.51 | 19.16 ± 3.02 | 8.269 | 0.001 |
Self-care skills | 34.71 ± 4.52 | 25.74 ± 4.02 | 9.495 | 0.001 |
Self-care knowledge | 43.61 ± 4.87 | 35.87 ± 4.03 | 7.840 | 0.001 |
Table 3 Comparison of compliance performance rating between the two groups, mean ± standard deviation, score
Group | Number of cases | Follow the doctor's advice | No drug abuse | Diet control | No unauthorized withdrawal |
Transitional Nursing Group | 41 | 3.16 ± 0.51 | 3.24 ± 0.45 | 3.19 ± 0.52 | 3.28 ± 0.43 |
General Nursing Group | 41 | 2.21 ± 0.37 | 2.24 ± 0.33 | 2.31 ± 0.43 | 2.06 ± 0.31 |
t | - | 9.654 | 11.475 | 8.351 | 14.737 |
P value | - | 0.001 | 0.001 | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Table 4 Comparison of mastery levels of knowledge between the two groups, n (%)
Group | Number of cases | High mastery level | Medium mastery level | Low mastery level | Knowledge mastery rate |
Transitional nursing group | 41 | 31 (75.61) | 9 (21.95) | 1 (2.44) | 40 (97.56) |
General nursing group | 41 | 20 (53.66) | 10 (24.39) | 11 (26.83) | 30 (73.17) |
χ2 | - | 10.539 | 0.167 | 23.808 | 23.808 |
P value | - | 0.001 | 0.683 | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Table 5 Comparison of complications between the transitional nursing group and general nursing group, n (%)
Group | Number of cases | Abdominal pain and diarrhea | Infection | Hematochezia | Other | Incidence of complications |
Transitional nursing group | 41 | 2 (4.88) | 1 (2.44) | 1 (2.44) | 3 (7.32) | 7 (17.07) |
General nursing group | 41 | 4 (9.76) | 3 (7.32) | 2 (4.88) | 5 (12.20) | 14 (34.15) |
χ2 | - | 1.755 | 2.565 | 0.844 | 1.352 | 7.706 |
P value | - | 0.185 | 0.109 | 0.358 | 0.245 | 0.006 |
- Citation: Li L, Huang L, Zhang N, Guo CM, Hu YQ. Influence of transitional nursing on the compliance behavior and disease knowledge of children with purpura nephritis. World J Clin Cases 2020; 8(21): 5213-5220
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2307-8960/full/v8/i21/5213.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v8.i21.5213