Retrospective Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2020.
World J Clin Cases. Oct 26, 2020; 8(20): 4719-4725
Published online Oct 26, 2020. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v8.i20.4719
Table 1 Comparison of general data of four groups of children

Magnesium sulfate wet pack group
Iodophor wet compress group
Ice pack group
Control group
P value
Age (mo)32.40 ± 8.89a31.03 ± 8.72a30.03 ± 9.08a31.33 ± 9.13 0.759
Height (cm)95.90 ± 7.02a95.40 ± 6.03a94.20 ± 5.40a94.83 ± 6.77 0.941
Weight (kg)14.50 ± 1.66a14.25 ± 1.53a13.91 ± 1.40a14.15 ± 1.60 0.781
Operation duration (h)3.53 ± 0.39a3.55 ± 0.38a3.38 ± 0.36a3.46 ± 0.4 10.599
Intraoperativbleeding (mL)90.20 ± 4.99a86.63 ± 6.37a88.33 ± 4.18a89.70 ± 6.11 0.211
Temperature (°C)2.03 ± 0.61a2.07 ± 0.69a1.80 ± 0.61a3.53 ± 0.57 0.132
Table 2 Time to regression of perineum swelling and the pain score in the four groups
Magnesium sulfate wet pack groupIodophor wet compress groupIce pack groupControl groupP value
Swelling to subside (d)2.98 ± 0.33a3.90 ± 0.33a3.11 ± 0.41a5.91 ± 0.630.001
Pain score4.07 ± 0.98a4.00 ± 1.05a3.93 ± 0.11a6.53 ± 1.280.025
Table 3 Comparison of the incidence of perineum blisters in the four groups

Total number of cases
Number of cases of blistering
Percentage
P value
Magnesium sulfate wet pack group3000%0.021
Iodophor wet compress group3000%
Ice pack group3000%
Control group30516.67%