Copyright
©The Author(s) 2020.
World J Clin Cases. Sep 26, 2020; 8(18): 3999-4009
Published online Sep 26, 2020. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v8.i18.3999
Published online Sep 26, 2020. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v8.i18.3999
Table 1 Distribution of the study subjects by age
| Age (yr) | No. of subjects | Percentage (%) |
| 16-18 | 16 | 41.02 |
| 19-22 | 14 | 35.89 |
| 23-40 | 7 | 17.94 |
| > 40 | 2 | 5.15 |
| Total | 39 | 100.0 |
Table 2 Distribution of time taken to perform ART
| Time taken for restoration (min) | No. of restorations in subjects | Percentage (%) |
| 9-15 | 22 | 40.7 |
| 16-19 | 32 | 59.3 |
| Total | 54 | 100.0 |
Table 3 Distribution of subjects according to acceptance of atraumatic restorative treatment using visual analogue scale
| VAS score | No. of restorations in subjects | Percentage (%) |
| 1-3 (mild) | 38 | 70.4 |
| 4 -7 (moderate) | 16 | 29.6 |
| 8-10 (severe) | 0 | 0.0 |
| Total | 54 | 100.0 |
Table 4 Distribution of restorations according to atraumatic restorative treatment evaluation criteria (Frencken J) at six months and twelve months follow-up
| Code | 6 mo, n = 54 | 12 mo, n = 49 | ||
| No. of restorations | Percentage (%) | No. of restorations | Percentage (%) | |
| 0 | 39 | 72.2 | 27 | 55.5 |
| 1 | 8 | 14.8 | 8 | 16.3 |
| 2 | 4 | 7.4 | 4 | 6.1 |
| 3 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2.0 |
| 4 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2.0 |
| 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 7 | 2 | 3.7 | 5 | 10.2 |
| 8 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 4.0 |
| 9 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 10 | 1 | 1.8 | 1 | 2.2 |
Table 5 Life table analysis of atraumatic restorative treatment at six months and 12 months follow-up
| Interval (mo) | Evaluated restoration | Success | Failure | Success rate (95%CI) | Cumulative survival rate (95%CI) |
| 6 mo | 54 | 49 | 4 | 94.4% (88.2%–99.9%) | 94.4% (88.2%-99.9%) |
| 12 mo | 49 | 40 | 7 | 85.7% (75.9%-95.5%) | 80.9% (69.9%-91.9%) |
Table 6 Calculation of direct cost for atraumatic restorative treatment
| Input cost | Financial cost | Economic cost | Annualized cost | Amount | |
| Expected use full life of the capital | Discount rate | ||||
| Primary consumables | |||||
| Space | 0 | 1000 INR (14.10 USD) | - | - | 400 INR (5.64 USD) (12 d) |
| Equipment (ART kit) | 0 | 4500 INR (63.47 USD) | 5 yr | 3.7 | 1216.21 INR (17.15 USD) |
| Secondary consumables | |||||
| Staff | 0 | 5400 INR (76.17 USD) | - | - | 5400 INR (76.17 USD) |
| Consumables | 2457 | 2457 INR (33.43 USD) | - | - | 2457 INR (34.65 USD) |
| Travel expenses | 600 | 600 INR (8.46 USD) | - | - | 600 INR (8.46 USD) |
| Total | 2947 | 11857 INR (167.25 USD) | 10073.2 INR (142.08 USD) | ||
- Citation: Shivanna MM, Ganesh S, Khanagar SB, Naik S, Divakar DD, Al-Kheraif AA, Jhugroo C. Twelve-month evaluation of the atraumatic restorative treatment approach for class III restorations: An interventional study. World J Clin Cases 2020; 8(18): 3999-4009
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2307-8960/full/v8/i18/3999.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v8.i18.3999
