Copyright
©The Author(s) 2020.
World J Clin Cases. Aug 26, 2020; 8(16): 3493-3502
Published online Aug 26, 2020. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v8.i16.3493
Published online Aug 26, 2020. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v8.i16.3493
Table 1 Efficacy of transcatheter arterial chemoembolization in different types of hepatocellular carcinoma, n (%)
Group | n | CR (%) | PR (%) | SD (%) | PD (%) |
Massive type | 71 | 0 | 17 (23.94) | 41 (57.75) | 13 (18.31) |
Nodular type | 80 | 0 | 13 (16.25) | 34 (42.50) | 33 (41.25) |
Diffuse type | 11 | 0 | 0 | 7 (63.64) | 4 (36.36) |
Table 2 Comparison of baseline data between hepatocellular carcinoma group and healthy group
Group | Number of cases | Age | BMI |
Cancer group | 162 | 51.31 ± 4.21 | 26.04 ± 2.54 |
Health group | 162 | 52.30 ± 5.28 | 25.73 ± 2.55 |
t | 1.87 | 0.31 | |
P value | 0.06 | 0.27 |
Table 3 Remission and recurrence of hepatic cancer patients undergoing hepatic artery embolization chemotherapy (transcatheter arterial chemoembolization)
Group | Remission | Relapse | χ2 | P value |
Classification of HCC | 9.44 | < 0.05 | ||
Massive type, n = 71 | 58 | 13 | ||
Nodular type, n = 80 | 47 | 33 | ||
Diffuse type, n = 11 | 7 | 4 | ||
Preoperative staging | 30.59 | < 0.05 | ||
II stage, n = 97 | 83 | 14 | ||
III stage, n = 65 | 29 | 36 | ||
Child-Pugh | 60.08 | < 0.05 | ||
Child A, n = 42 | 34 | 8 | ||
Child B, n = 88 | 74 | 14 | ||
Child C, n = 32 | 4 | 28 | ||
AFP level | 0.87 | > 0.05 | ||
> 400 ng/mL, n = 124 | 86 | 38 | ||
20-400 ng/mL, n = 10 | 8 | 2 | ||
< 20 ng/mL, n = 28 | 18 | 10 |
Table 4 Comparison of serum glypican-3 and miR-1271 levels in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma
Group | Number of cases | Glypican-3 | t | P value | miR-1271 | t | P value |
Group 1 | 7.41 | < 0.05 | 18.06 | < 0.05 | |||
Health group | 162 | 0.74 ± 0.29 | 5.48 ± 1.79 | ||||
Cancer group | 162 | 8.87 ± 3.73 | 1.25 ± 0.68 | ||||
Group 2 | 18.06 | < 0.05 | 18.06 | < 0.05 | |||
Before treatment | 162 | 8.87 ± 3.73 | 1.25 ± 0.68 | ||||
After treatment | 162 | 2.46 ± 1.69 | 4.64 ± 2.13 | ||||
Group 3 | 7.6 | < 0.05 | 4.17 | < 0.05 | |||
Remission group | 112 | 6.79 ± 5.32 | 4.96 ± 2.28 | ||||
Recurrent group | 50 | 8.74 ± 2.40 | 3.41 ± 1.96 |
Table 5 Comparison of sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of miR-1271 and glypican-3 alone and jointly for detection of hepatocellular carcinoma (%)
Items | Sensitivity | Specificity | Accuracy | RR (95%CI) |
GPC3 | 68.9 | 86.0 | 75.3 | 0.926 (0.561-1.471) |
miR-1271 | 76.0 | 72.8 | 76.5 | 0.925 (0.374-1.482) |
GPC3 + miR-1271 | 94.7 | 65.0 | 80.3 | 0.931 (0.537-1.312) |
- Citation: Guo Z, Wang J, Li L, Liu R, Fang J, Tie B. Value of miR-1271 and glypican-3 in evaluating the prognosis of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma after transcatheter arterial chemoembolization. World J Clin Cases 2020; 8(16): 3493-3502
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2307-8960/full/v8/i16/3493.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v8.i16.3493