Copyright
©The Author(s) 2020.
World J Clin Cases. Aug 26, 2020; 8(16): 3483-3492
Published online Aug 26, 2020. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v8.i16.3483
Published online Aug 26, 2020. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v8.i16.3483
Table 1 General data analysis of the two groups (mean ± SD, n = 9240)
Group | Cases | Age (yr) | Gestational age (d) | Gravidity (times) | Neonatal weight (g) |
Observation | 1076 | 29.33 ± 3.04 | 279.85 ± 7.01 | 1.43 ± 0.74 | 3329.73 ± 324.57 |
Control | 8164 | 29.13 ± 3.45 | 277.59 ± 7.18 | 1.58 ± 0.88 | 3651.35 ± 337.62 |
t | 1.847 | 9.727 | -5.63 | 7.63 |
Table 2 Comparison of basic data and labor management between the two groups
Pregnancy outcome | χ2 | P value | ||||
Control group (vaginal delivery) | Observation group (conversion to cesarean section) | |||||
Frequency | Percent | Frequency | Percent | |||
Age (yr) | ||||||
≤ 20 | 34 | 0.4 | 3 | 0.3 | 0.503 | 0.478 |
20-35 | 7523 | 92.2 | 1015 | 94.3 | ||
≥ 35 | 607 | 7.4 | 58 | 5.4 | 6.005 | 0.014 |
Neonatal weight (g) | ||||||
< 2500 | 37 | 0.4 | 6 | 0.6 | 0.381 | 0.537 |
2500-4000 | 7444 | 91.2 | 920 | 85.5 | ||
≥ 4000 | 683 | 8.4 | 150 | 13.9 | 36.186 | 0.000 |
Gestational age (wk) | ||||||
< 37 | 54 | 0.7 | 5 | 0.6 | 0.303 | 0.582 |
37-41 | 7298 | 89.4 | 874 | 88.2 | ||
≥ 41 | 812 | 9.9 | 197 | 11.5 | 67.943 | 0.000 |
Use of uterine contraction drugs | ||||||
Yes | 2578 | 31.6 | 447 | 44.3 | 42.873 | 0. 000 |
No | 5586 | 68.4 | 559 | 55.7 | ||
Parity | ||||||
Primipara | 6642 | 81.4 | 1040 | 96.7 | 158.695 | 0. 000 |
Multipara | 1522 | 18.6 | 36 | 3.3 | ||
Fever during labor | ||||||
Yes | 365 | 4.5 | 191 | 17.8 | 296.479 | 0. 000 |
No | 7799 | 95.5 | 885 | 82.2 | ||
Labor analgesia | ||||||
Yes | 3685 | 45.1 | 415 | 38.6 | 16.617 | 0. 000 |
No | 4479 | 54.9 | 661 | 61.4 | ||
Scarred uterus | ||||||
Yes | 23 | 0.3 | 5 | 0.5 | 1.053 | 0.305 |
No | 8141 | 99.7 | 1071 | 99.5 | ||
Abnormal amniotic fluid (meconium stained or bloody) | ||||||
Yes | 2158 | 26.4 | 290 | 27 | 0.131 | 0.717 |
No | 6006 | 73.6 | 786 | 73 | ||
Prolonged labor/active stage retention | ||||||
Yes | 344 | 4.2 | 56 | 5.2 | 2.254 | 0.133 |
No | 7820 | 95.8 | 1020 | 94.8 | ||
Prolonged pregnancy | ||||||
Yes | 7 | 0.1 | 1 | 0.1 | 0.006 | 0.94 |
No | 8157 | 99.9 | 1075 | 99.9 |
Table 3 Multivariate logistic regression analysis of conversion to cesarean section in failed trial of labor
Factor | β | SE | Wald | P value | OR | 95%CI | |
Lower limit | Upper limit | ||||||
Age | -0.274 | 0.148 | 3.413 | 0.065 | 0.760 | 0.569 | 1.017 |
Gestational age | -0.619 | 0.090 | 47.055 | 0.000 | 0.538 | 0.451 | 0.642 |
Primipara | -2.036 | 0.179 | 129.417 | 0.000 | 0.131 | 0.092 | 0.185 |
Uterine contraction drugs | -0.324 | 0.070 | 21.557 | 0.000 | 0.723 | 0.631 | 0.829 |
Fever during birth | -1.426 | 0.100 | 203.684 | 0.000 | 0.240 | 0.198 | 0.292 |
Neonatal weight | -0.282 | 0.052 | 29.809 | 0.000 | 0.754 | 0.681 | 0.834 |
Labor analgesia | 0.620 | 0.070 | 77.782 | 0.000 | 1.858 | 1.619 | 2.132 |
Table 4 Analysis of indications for conversion to cesarean section in failed trial of labor
Indication for conversion to cesarean section | Frequency | Constituent ratio (%) | Ordinal position |
Fetal distress | 477 | 44.3 | 1 |
Social factors | 138 | 12.8 | 2 |
Malpresentation | 101 | 9.4 | 3 |
Cephalopelvic disproportion | 96 | 8.9 | 4 |
Prolonged labor/active stage retention | 56 | 5.2 | 5 |
Chorioamnionitis | 51 | 4.7 | 6 |
Macrosomia | 48 | 4.5 | 7 |
Fever during labor | 20 | 1.9 | 8 |
Placental abruption | 16 | 1.5 | 9 |
Pregnancy complication | 15 | 1.4 | 10 |
Oligohydramnios | 14 | 1.3 | 11 |
Other | 14 | 1.3 | 11 |
Premature rupture of membranes | 10 | 0.9 | 12 |
Umbilical abnormality | 10 | 0.9 | 12 |
Induction failure | 5 | 0.5 | 13 |
Scarred uterus | 5 | 0.5 | 13 |
Table 5 Analysis of indications for conversion to cesarean section in women with high risk factors for vaginal trial of labor failure, n (%)
Advanced age | Gestational wk ≥ 41 (n = 197) | Primipara (n = 1040) | Uterine contraction drugs (n = 477) | Fever during labor (n = 191) | Macrosomia (n = 150) | |
Fetal distress | 25 (43.1) | 47 (23.9) | 349 (33.5) | 156 (32.7) | 42 (22) | 37 (24.7) |
Social factors | 4 (6.9) | 22 (11.2) | 131 (12.6) | 59 (12.4) | 13 (6.8) | 14 (9.3) |
Malpresentation | 7 (12.1) | 10 (5.1) | 78 (7.5) | 55 (11.5) | 18 (9.4) | 12 (8) |
Cephalopelvic disproportion | 6 (10.3) | 9 (4.6) | 95 (9.1) | 44 (9.2) | 21 (11) | 16 (10.7) |
Abnormal labor | 4 (6.9) | 13 (6.6) | 39 (3.8) | 27 (5.7) | 10 (5.2) | 8 (5.3) |
Other | 12 (20.7) | 96 (48.8) | 348 (33.5) | 136 (28.5) | 87 (45.6) | 63 (42) |
- Citation: Wang JG, Sun JL, Shen J. Factors affecting failed trial of labor and countermeasures: A retrospective analysis. World J Clin Cases 2020; 8(16): 3483-3492
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2307-8960/full/v8/i16/3483.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v8.i16.3483