Copyright
©The Author(s) 2020.
World J Clin Cases. Jun 26, 2020; 8(12): 2510-2519
Published online Jun 26, 2020. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v8.i12.2510
Published online Jun 26, 2020. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v8.i12.2510
Table 1 Comparison of general information between the benign group and the malignant non-mass lesions group
| Group | Age (yr) | Maximum diameter (cm) | Location | Amenorrhea | Lactation history | |||
| Left | Right | Yes | No | Yes | No | |||
| Benign (n = 66) | 49.70 ± 10.38 | 2.10 ± 1.52 | 38 | 28 | 17 | 49 | 55 | 11 |
| Malignant (n = 52) | 50.56 ± 9.27 | 2.38 ± 1.64 | 27 | 25 | 13 | 39 | 44 | 8 |
| t/χ2 value | -0.205 | -0.959 | 0.376 | 0.009 | 0.035 | |||
| P value | 0.419 | 0.339 | 0.540 | 0.925 | 0.851 | |||
Table 2 Comparison of internal elasticity parameters of non-mass lesions (kPa)
| Internal parameter | Benign (n = 66) | Malignant (n = 52) | t value | P value |
| Emax | 42.43 ± 20.62 | 97.95 ± 23.56 | -13.634 | 0.000 |
| Emean | 18.34 ± 7.16 | 32.62 ± 14.98 | -6.823 | 0.000 |
| Emin | 4.26 ± 2.05 | 5.00 ± 2.47 | -1.778 | 0.078 |
| Esd | 6.34 ± 3.48 | 15.39 ± 4.17 | -12.848 | 0.000 |
Table 3 Comparison of elasticity parameters around non-mass lesions
| Peripheral parameter | Benign (n = 66) | Malignant (n = 52) | t/χ2 value | P value | |
| “Stiff rim” sign | 6 | 26 | 24.628 | 0.000 | |
| Shell at 1 mm | E1 max | 45.53 ± 22.81 | 125.41 ± 35.68 | -14.765 | 0.000 |
| E1 mean | 24.94 ± 7.92 | 45.49 ± 17.71 | -8.425 | 0.000 | |
| Shell at 1.5 mm | E1.5 max | 46.61 ± 22.39 | 136.40 ± 38.39 | -15.889 | 0.000 |
| E1.5 mean | 25.36 ± 8.52 | 49.64 ± 18.98 | -9.281 | 0.000 | |
| Shell at 2 mm | E2 max | 50.43 ± 24.62 | 153.95 ± 35.56 | -18.655 | 0.000 |
| E2 mean | 26.34 ± 7.16 | 54.62 ± 17.98 | -11.668 | 0.000 | |
| Shell at 2.5 mm | E2.5 max | 48.43 ± 25.62 | 167.95 ± 37.56 | -20.506 | 0.000 |
| E2.5 mean | 29.34 ± 7.16 | 69.62 ± 19.98 | -15.200 | 0.000 | |
| Shell at 3 mm | E3 max | 42.43 ± 20.62 | 153.95 ± 23.56 | -27.386 | 0.000 |
| E3 mean | 26.34 ± 7.16 | 58.62 ± 14.98 | -15.424 | 0.000 | |
Table 4 Sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, cutoff value and the area under the curve of each parameter
| Parameter | Sensitivity (%) | Specificity (%) | Accuracy (%) | Cutoff value | AUC |
| “Stiff rim” sign | 50.00 | 90.91 | 72.88 | - | - |
| Emax | 74.33 | 66.80 | 67.05 | 67.61 | 0.707 |
| Emean | 54.95 | 68.47 | 59.86 | 28.05 | 0.626 |
| Emin | 36.15 | 49.60 | 43.64 | 4.96 | 0.425 |
| Esd | 70.18 | 63.67 | 68.93 | 11.30 | 0.687 |
| E1 max | 83.61 | 75.01 | 75.04 | 84.65 | 0.795 |
| E1 mean | 68.29 | 57.94 | 63.69 | 33.08 | 0.647 |
| E1.5 max | 83.00 | 74.18 | 77.00 | 95.60 | 0.789 |
| E1.5 mean | 74.48 | 63.95 | 65.24 | 36.24 | 0.692 |
| E2 max | 86.36 | 76.04 | 80.06 | 100.50 | 0.826 |
| E2 mean | 75.53 | 66.11 | 68.51 | 33.97 | 0.704 |
| E2.5 max | 94.57 | 85.86 | 87.44 | 94.62 | 0.900 |
| E2.5 mean | 79.05 | 70.04 | 80.51 | 36.17 | 0.746 |
| E3 max | 90.52 | 81.83 | 84.03 | 88.56 | 0.881 |
| E3 mean | 76.82 | 68.11 | 76.86 | 35.48 | 0.734 |
- Citation: Xu P, Wu M, Yang M, Xiao J, Ruan ZM, Wu LY. Evaluation of internal and shell stiffness in the differential diagnosis of breast non-mass lesions by shear wave elastography. World J Clin Cases 2020; 8(12): 2510-2519
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2307-8960/full/v8/i12/2510.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v8.i12.2510
