Copyright
©The Author(s) 2020.
World J Clin Cases. May 26, 2020; 8(10): 1859-1870
Published online May 26, 2020. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v8.i10.1859
Published online May 26, 2020. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v8.i10.1859
Table 1 Gender distribution, clinical appearance and average stenosis rate in patients with carotid artery stenosis
| Characteristic | n | % | |
| Gender | Female | 17 | 26.6 |
| Male | 47 | 73.4 | |
| Clinical appearance | Asymptomatic | 12 | 18.8 |
| Symptomatic | 52 | 81.2 | |
| Average stenosis rate | Asymptomatic | - | 68.33 |
| Symptomatic | - | 74.69 | |
Table 2 Accompanying comorbid diseases and risk factors for cases with carotid artery stenosis
| Comorbid diseases and risk factors | n | % |
| Hypertension | 38 | 30.2 |
| Diabetes mellitus | 22 | 17.5 |
| Cerebrovascular disease | 20 | 15.9 |
| Coronary artery disease | 15 | 11.9 |
| Hyperlipidemia | 9 | 7.1 |
| Smoking | 8 | 6.3 |
| Goiter | 5 | 4.0 |
| Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease | 4 | 3.2 |
| Congestive heart failure | 2 | 1.6 |
| Asthma | 1 | 0.8 |
| Glaucoma | 1 | 0.8 |
| Familial mediterranean fever | 1 | 0.8 |
Table 3 Side and location of carotid artery stenosis and distribution of atherosclerotic plaque morphology
| Parameters | n | % | |
| Side of stenosis | Right | 33 | 51.6 |
| Left | 31 | 48.4 | |
| Location of stenosis | CCA distal and ICA bulb | 6 | 9.3 |
| ICA bulb | 42 | 65.6 | |
| Dissection of ICA bulb | 1 | 1.6 | |
| Distal of ICA bulb | 4 | 6.3 | |
| ICA bulb origin | 3 | 4.6 | |
| Proximal of ICA bulb | 2 | 3.1 | |
| Post-bulbar ICA and bulb | 1 | 1.6 | |
| Petrous ICA | 1 | 1.6 | |
| Post-bulbar ICA | 4 | 6.3 | |
| Plaque morphology | Short segment regular surfaced | 4 | 6.3 |
| Short segment irregular surfaced | 2 | 3.2 | |
| Short segment ulcerated | 2 | 3.2 | |
| Long segment regular surfaced | 19 | 30.1 | |
| Long segment irregular surfaced | 12 | 19.1 | |
| Long segment ulcerated | 24 | 38.1 | |
Table 4 Location and distribution by vascular territories of ischemic lesions which developed after carotid artery stenting based on diffusion-weighted imaging
| Parameters | n | % |
| Location of cerebral parenchymal lesion | ||
| Occipital lobe | 11 | 28.2 |
| Frontal lobe | 10 | 25.6 |
| Parietal lobe | 8 | 20.5 |
| Basal ganglions | 3 | 7.7 |
| Cerebellum | 2 | 5.1 |
| Frontoparietal | 1 | 2.6 |
| Parietooccipital | 1 | 2.6 |
| Frontoparietooccipital | 1 | 2.6 |
| Occipitotemporoparietal | 1 | 2.6 |
| Corpus callosum | 1 | 2.6 |
| Cerebral vascular territory | ||
| MCA | 15 | 38.5 |
| PCA | 8 | 20.5 |
| MCA-PCA “watershed” | 7 | 17.9 |
| ACA | 3 | 7.7 |
| ACA-MCA “watershed” | 2 | 5.1 |
| ACA-MCA and MCA-PCA “watershed” | 2 | 5.1 |
| PICA | 1 | 2.6 |
| SCA | 1 | 2.6 |
Table 5 Technical properties, ischemic lesion numbers and complications in carotid artery stenting procedures
| Case No. | Age | Gender | Stenosis localization | Balloon angioplasty | Embolic protection device | Ipsilateral lesion | Contralateral lesion | Complication |
| 3 | 59 | M | L ICA bulb | + | + | 5 | - | Silent ischemia |
| 6 | 71 | M | L ICA bulb | + | + | 1 | - | Silent ischemia |
| 8 | 72 | M | L ICA bulb | + | + | 3 | - | Silent ischemia |
| 9 | 71 | F | L ICA bulb | + | + | 2 | - | Silent ischemia |
| 11 | 78 | M | L ICA bulb | - | + | 3 | - | Silent ischemia |
| 13 | 72 | M | L ICA distal to bulb | + | + | 1 | - | Symptomatic ischemia |
| 15 | 71 | M | R ICA bulb | + | + | 1 | - | Silent ischemia |
| 16 | 62 | F | L ICA bulb | + | + | 4 | 3 | Silent ischemia |
| 17 | 75 | F | R ICA bulb | + | + | - | 1 | Silent ischemia |
| 19 | 68 | M | L post-bulbar ICA | + | + | 2 | - | Silent ischemia |
| 23 | 67 | M | R ICA bulb | + | + | 1 | - | Silent ischemia |
| 26 | 84 | M | L ICA bulb | + | + | - | 1 | Symptomatic ischemia |
| 29 | 76 | M | L post-bulbar ICA | + | + | 1 | - | Symptomatic ischemia |
| 36 | 70 | F | R ICA bulb | + | + | - | 1 | Silent ischemia |
| 38 | 76 | M | R ICA bulb | + | + | 1 | - | Silent ischemia |
| 46 | 74 | M | L ICA bulb | + | + | 3 | - | Silent ischemia |
| 52 | 68 | F | R ICA bulb | + | + | 1 | - | Symptomatic ischemia |
| 54 | 72 | F | R ICA bulb | + | + | 2 | - | Silent ischemia |
| 58 | 67 | M | R ICA bulb | + | + | 1 | - | Silent ischemia |
| 59 | 67 | M | L ICA bulb | + | + | 1 | - | Symptomatic ischemia |
Table 6 Time to symptom development, neurological symptoms and prognosis in symptomatic patients after carotid artery stenting
| Case No. | Time to symptom development | Neurological symptoms | Prognosis |
| 13 | 1st hour | Loss of upper limb strength, right lower limb hemiparesis | Right upper limb muscle strength 4/5 |
| 26 | 5th hour | Restlessness, agitation | Recovery without sequelae |
| 29 | 19th hour | Motor aphasia, right upper limb muscle strength 2/5, plegia of right leg | Right upper limb muscle strength 4/5, dysdiadochokinesia |
| 52 | 22nd hour | Hemiparesis | Recovery without sequelae |
| 59 | 24th hour | Cloudy vision, vertigo, ataxia | Recovery without sequelae |
- Citation: Beyhan M, Acu B, Gökçe E, Fırat MM. Evaluation of ischemic lesions after carotid artery stenting with diffusion-weighted imaging. World J Clin Cases 2020; 8(10): 1859-1870
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2307-8960/full/v8/i10/1859.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v8.i10.1859
