Copyright
©The Author(s) 2019.
World J Clin Cases. Dec 26, 2019; 7(24): 4196-4207
Published online Dec 26, 2019. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v7.i24.4196
Published online Dec 26, 2019. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v7.i24.4196
Table 1 Comparison of the patients' data between groups A and B
Characteristic | Group A | Group B | t/Z/X2 | P |
Number of UKA | 60 | 58 | 0.416 | 0.519 |
Bilateral surgeries | 6 | 7 | ||
Age (yr) | 61.2 ± 8.4 | 63.0 ± 8.1 | 1.169 | 0.245 |
Gender (Male/Female) | 12/48 | 19/39 | 2.478 | 0.115 |
Side (Left/Right) | 21/39 | 27/31 | 1.631 | 0.212 |
Height (cm) | 160 (156-163) | 160 (156-167) | 1.190 | 0.234 |
Weight (kg) | 69.0 (63.0-75.8) | 70.0 (64.5-78.3) | 0.989 | 0.323 |
Body mass index (kg/m²) | 27.1 ± 3.2 | 27.2 ± 3.5 | 0.167 | 0.868 |
Etiology (OA/Post-traumatic arthritis) | 57/3 | 55/3 | 0.142 | 0.766 |
Follow-up period (yr) | 7.08 (6.42-7.83) | 7.08 (6.42-7.83) | 0.100 | 0.921 |
Table 2 Inpatient information of the two groups
Group A | Group B | Z/X2 | P | |
Hospitalization time (d) | 12.0 (11.0-14.75) | 10.5 (9.0-13.3) | 2.246 | 0.025 |
Hemorrhage during operation (mL) | 100 (50-100) | 50 (50-100) | 1.484 | 0.138 |
Total volume of blood transfusion (mL) | 0 (0-350) | 350 (0-565) | 3.325 | 0.001 |
Percentage of patients receiving blood transfusion (%) | 40 | 67.2 | 8.795 | 0.003 |
Percentage of patients developing complications after operation (%) | 1.7 | 1.7 | 0.475 | 0.491 |
Table 3 Modes of failure in both groups and follow-up
Group | Number of of knees | Mean time to revision (yr) | Follow-up years |
Group A | |||
Progression of arthritis | 2 | 6.92 | 7.42 |
Aseptic loosening | 1 | 6.33 | 7.33 |
Group B | |||
Progression of arthritis | 3 | 6.33 | 6.86 |
Bearing dislocation | 1 | 1 | 9.58 |
Table 4 Outcome scores and radiological information of the two groups at pre-operation and last follow-up
Group | Pre-operation | Last follow-up | mean difference (95%CI) | P |
Group A | ||||
HSS score | 59.6 ± 10.9 | 82.7 ± 9.3 | 23.2 (19.3-27.0) | 0.000 |
Knee society score | 47.3 ± 6.3 | 76.2 ± 13.1 | 28.9 (25.1-32.7) | 0.000 |
Knee function score | 57.5 ± 6.3 | 75.1 ± 19.6 | 17.5 (12.1-23.0) | 0.000 |
FTA | 179.9 ± 3.5 | 175.2 ± 2.5 | 4.7 (3.5-5.8) | 0.000 |
HKA | 175.1 ± 2.8 | 176.7 ± 3.1 | 1.6 (0.4-2.7) | 0.008 |
ROM | 121.5 ± 8.2 | 129.1 ± 11.5 | 7.6 (4.1-11.2) | 0.000 |
Group B | ||||
HSS score | 59.3 ± 15.6 | 84.3 ± 10.1 | 23.7 (18.9-28.5) | 0.000 |
Knee society score | 49.1 ± 9.2 | 75.1 ± 13.2 | 24.7 (19.9-29.5) | 0.000 |
Knee function score | 59.3 ± 9.0 | 77.4 ± 13.8 | 17.2 (12.8-21.6) | 0.000 |
FTA | 181.5 ± 5.0 | 175.0 ± 3.7 | 6.2 (4.5-7.8) | 0.000 |
HKA | 173.9 ± 3.7 | 176.5 ± 3.2 | 2.5 (1.0-4.0) | 0.001 |
ROM | 116.1 ± 17.3 | 131.1 ± 14.1 | 14.2 (8.7-19.7) | 0.000 |
- Citation: Wang HR, Li ZL, Li J, Wang YX, Zhao ZD, Li W. Arthroscopy combined with unicondylar knee arthroplasty for treatment of isolated unicompartmental knee arthritis: A long-term comparison. World J Clin Cases 2019; 7(24): 4196-4207
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2307-8960/full/v7/i24/4196.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v7.i24.4196