Basic Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2018.
World J Clin Cases. Sep 6, 2018; 6(9): 249-258
Published online Sep 6, 2018. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v6.i9.249
Table 1 Grading criteria for histopathological assessment of scar tissue by He et al[29]
GradeWidth of the scar tissue
0No scar tissue in dura mater
1Thin fibrosis bands present between scar tissue and dura mater
2Adhesions holding 2/3 of the laminectomy defect present
3Widespread scar. More than 2/3 of the laminectomy defect affected
Table 2 Microvessels visualized by CD105 immunostaining
GradeAverage number of microvessels (400 x)
1≤ 3
24-6
3≥ 7
Table 3 Grading of fibrosis and statistical results based on various criteria
Control (Group 1)
Sorafenib (Group 2)
Assessment measureGraden%n%P
Fibrosis score000450< 0.001
100450
3810000
Fibroblast density1008100< 0.001
3810000
Inflammatory cell density100675< 0.001
2225225
367500
CD105-stained microvessels100675< 0.001
2225225
367500
Osteopontin-stained microvessels1450787.50.355
2225112.5
322500