Modified laparoscopic Sugarbaker repair of parastomal hernia with a three-point anchoring technique

Table 1 Demographic data

No. of patients	8
Age (yr)	65.3 ± 7.4
Gender (male/female)	5/3
BMI (kg/m2)	24.5 ± 3.8
ASA
I	0
II	7
III	1
Comorbidity	Two cases of diabetes
Smoker (yes/no)	1/7
Type of stoma
Colostomy	4
Ileostomy	4
Size of defect (cm2)	17.9 ± 10.3
EHS classification of PSHs
EHS 1	3
EHS 2	1
EHS 3	3
EHS 4	1

BMI: Body Mass Index; EHS: European Hernia Society; PSH: Parastomal hernia.

Table 2 Outcomes

Outcomes	Results
Time spent for operation (min), mean ± standard deviation	205.6 ± 66.7
No. of patients undergoing Lap-Re-Do (yes/no)	3/5
Concomitant incisional hernia (yes/no)	2/6
Types of mesh (biologic/Sepramesh)	2/6
Intraoperative complication (yes/no)	1/7
Size of mesh (cm2), median (range)	300 (221.3-300)
Pain score on postoperative day 1 (VAS)
Median (range)	1 (1-2)
VAS = 1	6 patients
VAS = 2	2 patients
Number of days of postoperative stay, mean ± standard deviation	10.4 ± 6.3
Follow-up period (mo), mean (min, max)	12.9 (6, 22)
Number of hernia recurrences	0
Postoperative complication (yes/no)	2/6

VAS: Visual analog scale.