Copyright
©The Author(s) 2015.
World J Clin Cases. Oct 16, 2015; 3(10): 880-886
Published online Oct 16, 2015. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v3.i10.880
Published online Oct 16, 2015. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v3.i10.880
Table 1 Differences in number of detected polyps between the 2 colonoscopies
| Previous day | Split-dose | P value | |
| Overall | 126 | 169 | < 0.001 |
| Diminutive overall | 88 | 126 | < 0.001 |
| Small overall | 25 | 29 | 0.046 |
| Large overall | 13 | 14 | 0.317 |
| Right | 64 | 84 | < 0.001 |
| Diminutive right | 46 | 62 | < 0.001 |
| Small right | 12 | 15 | 0.083 |
| Large right | 6 | 7 | 0.317 |
| Left | 62 | 85 | < 0.001 |
| Diminutive left | 42 | 64 | < 0.001 |
| Small left | 13 | 14 | 0.317 |
| Large left | 7 | 7 | 1.000 |
- Citation: Papanikolaou IS, Sioulas AD, Magdalinos N, Beintaris I, Lazaridis LD, Polymeros D, Malli C, Dimitriadis GD, Triantafyllou K. Improved bowel preparation increases polyp detection and unmasks significant polyp miss rate. World J Clin Cases 2015; 3(10): 880-886
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2307-8960/full/v3/i10/880.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v3.i10.880