Copyright
©The Author(s) 2015.
World J Clin Cases. Jan 16, 2015; 3(1): 65-76
Published online Jan 16, 2015. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v3.i1.65
Published online Jan 16, 2015. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v3.i1.65
Ref. | Implant surface | Implant length | N implants | Period of evaluation | Success rate (%) |
Bahat[127] | Machined-surface | 7 mm | - | 5 to 70 mo | 90.50 |
Winkler et al[130] | Machined-surface | < 10 mm | 181 | 3 yr | 93.40 |
Friberg et al[103] | Machined-surface | < 10 mm | 247 | 8 yr | 93.70 |
Deporter et al[84] | Porous-surface | 7 or 9 mm | 48 | 8.2 to 50.3 mo | 100.00 |
Tawil et al[107] | Machined-surface | ≤ 10 mm | 269 | 12 to 92 mo | 95.50 |
Griffin et al[113] | Hydroxyapatite-coated | 8 mm | 168 | Up to 68 mo | 100.00 |
Renouard et al[151] | Machined or oxidized surface | 6 to 8.5 mm | 96 | 2 yr | 94.60 |
Goené et al[110] | Acid-etched surface | 7 or 8.5 mm | 311 | 3 yr | 95.80 |
Misch et al[85] | Roughened surface | 7 or 9 mm | 745 | 6 yr | 98.90 |
Anitua et al[86] | Micro-rough acid-etched surface; bioactive surface | 7 to 8.5 mm | 532 | 5 yr | 99.20 |
Grant et al[117] | - | 8 mm | 335 | up to 2 yr | 99.00 |
Anitua et al[114] | - | < 8.5 mm | 1.287 | 1 to 8 yr | 99.30 |
De Santis et al[97] | Oxidized surface | < 8.5 mm | 107 | 1 to 3 yr | 98.10 |
Maló et al[104] | Oxidized surface | 7 mm | 217 | 12 mo | 95.00 |
Pieri et al[111] | - | 6 mm | 61 | 2 yr | 96.80 |
Perelli et al[27] | Porous-surface | 5 or 7 mm | 110 | 5 yr | 90.00 |
Jiansheng et al[109] | Hydroxyapatite-coated and ankylos | 5.7 to 8 mm | 162 | 2 yr | 99.40 |
Slotte et al[29] | Acid-etched surface | 4 mm | 100 | 2 yr | 92.30 |
Deporter et al[88] | Porous-surface | 7 or 9 mm | 48 | 10 yr | 95.50 |
Ref. | N implants | Posterior zone | Period of evaluation | Implant systems | Success rate (%) |
Jemt et al[4] | 259 | Maxilla and mandible | 5 yr | Nobelpharma | 97.20 |
Zarb et al[144] | 105 | Maxilla and mandible | 2.6-7.4 yr | Nobelpharma | 94.30 |
Block et al[142] | 443 | Mandible | 10 yr | 79.30 | |
Becker et al[143] | 282 | Maxilla and mandible | 6 yr | Branemark | 89.40 |
Bahat[145] | 660 | Maxilla | 10 yr | Branemark | 93.40 |
Attard et al[5] | 106 | Maxilla and Mandible | 10 yr | Nobel biocare | 94.00 |
Attard et al[152] | 432 | Maxilla and Mandible | 15 yr | Nobel biocare | 91.60 |
Jebreen et al[7] | 141 | Maxilla and Mandible | 12-69 mo | ITI | 96.45 |
Blanes et al[6] | 192 | Maxilla and Mandible | 10 yr | ITI | 97.90 |
Huynh-Ba et al[153] | 273 | Maxilla | 8 yr | - | 94.90 |
Maló et al[70] | 247 | Maxilla and Mandible | 11 yr | Nobel biocare | 95.10 |
Schneider et al[126] | 100 | Maxilla and Mandible | 5 yr | Nobel biocare and straumann standard | 95.80 |
- Citation: Monteiro DR, Silva EVF, Pellizzer EP, Filho OM, Goiato MC. Posterior partially edentulous jaws, planning a rehabilitation with dental implants. World J Clin Cases 2015; 3(1): 65-76
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2307-8960/full/v3/i1/65.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v3.i1.65