Copyright
©2014 Baishideng Publishing Group Inc.
World J Clin Cases. Aug 16, 2014; 2(8): 357-361
Published online Aug 16, 2014. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v2.i8.357
Published online Aug 16, 2014. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v2.i8.357
Table 1 Clinical outcome and complications occurrence n (%)
| Clinical outcome | Complications | |||||||||||||
| Range of motion | Mayo | Dash | GripstrengTH | Satisfaction | Eterotopicossification | Tendonre-rupture | Pin palsy | |||||||
| Flexion | Extension | Pronation | Supination | |||||||||||
| 125 ± 8.4 | 94% | -2 ± 4.3 | 97% | 80 ± 5.7 | 93% | 82 ± 6.5 | 96% | 97.2 ± 12.0 | 4.8 ± 8.2 | 83% | 9.4 ± 5.6 | 3 (6.4) | 1 (2.1) | 2 (4.3) |
- Citation: Tarallo L, Mugnai R, Zambianchi F, Adani R, Catani F. Distal biceps tendon rupture reconstruction using muscle-splitting double-incision approach. World J Clin Cases 2014; 2(8): 357-361
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2307-8960/full/v2/i8/357.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v2.i8.357