BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Minireviews
Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Clin Cases. Sep 26, 2026; 14(27): 126695
Published online Sep 26, 2026. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.126695
Table 1 Selected therapeutic studies and their distinct endpoints
Study and design
Population and treatment background
Endpoint and assessment time
Results and denominator
Evidence maturity and interpretation
Imdusiran (AB-729-001)[8]. Phase 1a/b; randomized healthy part; open-label CHB parts83 dosed: 18 healthy (12 active/6 placebo) and 65 CHB (22 single-dose/43 repeat-dose). Non-cirrhotic CHB; HBsAg ≥ 250 IU/mL; NA continued where prescribedPrimary: Safety. Healthy follow-up to day 29; CHB safety follow-up to 48 weeks, or 36 months in eligible NA discontinuers. Repeat dosing up to 48 weeksNo functional-cure n/N reported in the verified abstract. All 83 comprised the safety populationEarly safety/antiviral study; total n includes healthy participants. Do not treat absence of a reported cure rate as zero efficacy
ARC-520/JNJ-3989 follow-up[9]. Prospective single-centre follow-up of earlier trials53 siRNA + NA recipients (15 ARC-520/38 JNJ-3989) and 5 prior placebo recipients; 83% previously on NA; 34% HBeAg-positiveHBsAg seroclearance or HBsAg < 100 IU/mL at last follow-up (mean 52.5 months). Exact seroclearance threshold: NR; no off-all-treatment DNA composite verifiedSeroclearance 1/53 (1.9%); HBsAg < 100 IU/mL 17/53 (32.1%); both 0/5 in placebo recipientsLong-term antigen durability with a small control group; not a demonstrated functional-cure comparison after withdrawal of all therapy
Xalnesiran ± immunomodulator (PIRANGA)[10]. Phase 2 randomized open-label adaptive platform159 NA-suppressed CHB participants: Xalnesiran 100 mg (30), 200 mg (30), 200 mg + ruzotolimod (34), 200 mg + PegIFN (30), NA alone (35). NA stopping conditionalPrimary: HBsAg < 0.05 IU/mL at 24 weeks after 48-week investigational treatment (week 72). HBV DNA not part of this primary endpoint2/30 (7%), 1/30 (3%), 4/34 (12%), 7/30 (23%), and 0/35, respectively. Loss observed only with screening HBsAg < 1000 IU/mLHBsAg loss is distinct from cure off all therapy. Small arms; exploratory baseline-HBsAg association does not establish a treatment-selection rule
JNJ-3989 ± bersacapavir (REEF-1)[11]. Phase 2b double-blind randomized trial470 randomized across six NA-containing arms; treated/untreated and HBeAg-positive/negative strata. Reported efficacy uses modified ITT denominatorsPrimary: NA-stopping eligibility at week 48: HBsAg < 10 IU/mL, HBV DNA < LLOQ (20 IU/mL), HBeAg-negative and ALT < 3 × ULNJNJ-3989 200 mg + NA: 18/94 (19%; 90%CI 13-27%); triple regimen: 8/94 (9%; 4%-15%); NA control: 1/45 (2%; 0%-10%)Eligibility to stop NA is not functional cure. The 19% result did not involve bersacapavir; triple therapy contained JNJ-3989 100 mg
Elebsiran ± PegIFN[12]. Open-label phase 2; six cohorts84 non-cirrhotic, NA-treated adults; entry HBsAg > 50 IU/mL and HBV DNA < 90 IU/mL. Cohort sizes 15/15/18/18/13/5; 12-48-week regimensPrimary: Safety. Secondary: HBsAg loss at any time and sustained through 24 weeks after investigational treatment. Exact HBsAg-loss threshold: NR; background NA continuedAny loss: 0/15, 1/15, 1/18, 5/18, 4/13, 0/5. Sustained loss: 0/15, 1/15, 0/18, 3/18, 2/13, 0/5 (6/84 overall)Exploratory cohorts with unequal regimens; pooled 6/84 is not an estimate for one regimen and does not establish cure after stopping NA
Vebicorvir[14]. Randomized phase 2 placebo-controlled trial73 non-cirrhotic NA-suppressed participants: 47 HBeAg-positive and 26 HBeAg-negative. Vebicorvir 300 mg daily or placebo added for 24 weeksPrimary: Change in HBsAg or HBeAg from baseline to week 24; continuous antigen endpoint, not an HBsAg/HBV DNA clearance compositeNo between-group difference in antigen change; improved suppression of replication markers. Functional-cure n/N not reported in the verified abstractDemonstrates antiviral activity without a demonstrated antigen-clearance advantage in this population; no inference about comparative cure efficacy
Elebsiran + BRII-179 ± interferon[15]. Phase 2a open-label randomized parallel-group study90 CHB participants: Elebsiran alone (10), plus vaccine without interferon (41), or plus vaccine with interferon (39). Nine 4-weekly elebsiran dosesVirologic and immunologic follow-up to week 72. Sustained HBsAg loss and anti-HBs persistence evaluated; exact HBsAg-loss threshold: NRNo sustained HBsAg loss (0/90). Anti-HBs ≥ 100 IU/L persisted in approximately 40% for ≥ 32 weeks after combination treatmentImmunogenicity is not functional cure. The absence of sustained clearance in this regimen does not exclude a benefit from other vaccine-containing sequences
Bepirovirsen (B-Clear)[16]. Phase 2b randomized investigator-unblinded trial457 ITT across four schedules: 227 on NA and 230 not on NA. For 300 mg weekly × 24 weeks: 68 on NA and 70 not on NA; background NA maintainedPrimary: HBsAg < 0.05 IU/mL and HBV DNA < 20 IU/mL at every visit for 24 weeks after planned bepirovirsen end, without new antiviral rescue; week 48 for the 24-week regimen300 mg × 24 weeks: 6/68 (9%) on NA and 7/70 (10%) not on NAOriginal primary endpoint; separate from modified analyses allowing isolated blips. On-NA responses do not establish cure after stopping all therapy
Bepirovirsen (B-Well 1/2)[17]. Two replicate double-blind randomized phase 3 trials1834 selected non-cirrhotic adults in the full analysis population on stable NA; entry HBsAg > 100 to 3000 IU/mL. Bepirovirsen 300 mg weekly or placebo for 24 weeks; eligible NA withdrawal at week 48Primary: Functional cure at week 72, ≥ 24 weeks after all treatment stopped: HBsAg not detected (< 0.05 IU/mL) and HBV DNA < LLOQ (< 20 IU/mL or target not detected)B-Well 1: 127/650 (20%) vs 0/328; B-Well 2: 106/570 (19%) vs 0/286Replicated efficacy within an enriched population. HBsAg-based enrollment was not a randomized selection strategy; durability beyond current follow-up remains to be established
Bepirovirsen then PegIFN (B-Together)[19]. Phase 2b randomized open-label trial108 ITT on stable NA throughout: 24-week (55) or 12-week (53) bepirovirsen, followed by up to 24-week PegIFNPrimary: HBsAg < 0.05 IU/mL and HBV DNA < 20 IU/mL at every visit for 24 weeks after planned PegIFN end, without new antiviral rescue; background NA continued5/55 (9%) and 8/53 (15%), respectively; all responders had baseline HBsAg ≤ 3000 IU/mLProof of concept; no bepirovirsen-alone concurrent control. Cross-trial relapse comparisons do not prove the benefit of adding PegIFN
Selgantolimod[20]. Randomized phase 2 placebo-controlled trial48 NA-suppressed participants (24 HBeAg-positive/24 negative): 39 active and 9 placebo. Weekly study drug for 24 weeks; NA continued through week 48Primary: ≥ 1 log10 IU/mL HBsAg decline at week 24. Additional HBsAg loss through week 48; exact loss threshold: NR. No off-all-treatment compositePrimary endpoint 1/39 active; HBsAg loss 2/39 (5%) active vs 0/9 placebo through week 48Small exploratory immunomodulator study; HBsAg loss on NA does not establish finite-treatment functional cure
NA withdrawal (STOP-NUC)[21]. Multicentre randomized stop-vs-continue trial166 randomized; 158 analyzed, 79 per arm. HBeAg-negative; continuous long-term NA with HBV DNA < 172 IU/mL for ≥ 4 yearsPrimary: Sustained HBsAg loss to week 96. HBsAg assay LOD 0.05 IU/mL; HBV DNA assay LOD 10 IU/mL. Primary endpoint differs from the B-Well composite8/79 (10.1%; 95%CI 4.8-19.5%) vs 0/79; P = 0.006. Baseline HBsAg < 1000 IU/mL subgroup: 7/25 (28%)Selected withdrawal trial; 11/79 (13.9%) retreated. No cessation-related serious adverse events observed; small numbers do not exclude uncommon serious harm
Elebsiran + PegIFN (ENSURE)[13]. Partially randomized open-label phase 2 trial55 randomized to PegIFN alone or plus elebsiran 200/100 mg; 31 previously vaccinated participants in a separate nonrandomized cohort. Non-cirrhotic, NA-suppressed; randomized entry HBsAg > 100 IU/mL to 3000 IU/mLHBsAg < 0.05 IU/mL at end of 48-week treatment and 24 weeks later (week 72); HBV DNA assay LLOQ 10 IU/mL. NA continued until week 72; withdrawal assessed afterwardWeek 72: 4/19 (21.1%) with 200 mg, 6/18 (33.3%) with 100 mg, 1/18 (5.6%) control. Prior-vaccine cohort: 8/19 anti-HBs responders vs 1/12 nonrespondersRandomized regimen comparison, but small samples and HBsAg enrichment. Prior-vaccine response is an exploratory association; endpoint does not establish cure off NA
OCTOPUS-1[22]. Open-label phase 2; randomized nivolumab schedules37 virally suppressed adults; JNJ-3989 + NA with one (n = 18) or three (n = 19) nivolumab infusions. Background NA continued through week 72Primary: HBsAg < 0.05 IU/mL at 24 weeks after the 24-week intervention (week 48); follow-up to week 72. HBV DNA LLOQ 20 IU/mL was a separate virological measurePrimary HBsAg loss: 0/18 and 0/19. One participant in the three-infusion arm achieved loss at 48-week follow-upNo internal arm without nivolumab; incremental benefit was assessed against an external REEF-1 cohort. No off-NA cure estimate. No serious or grade 3/4 adverse events; two transient asymptomatic hyperthyroidism cases
REEF-IT[23]. Open-label phase 2; regimen amended during study54 untreated HBeAg-positive adults; JNJ-3989 + NA ± bersacapavir for 36-52 weeks, followed by 12-week PegIFN add-on. Most continued NA during follow-up; only one met NA-completion criteriaPrimary: HBsAg < 0.05 IU/mL at 24 weeks after stopping all study treatment, without NA restart. Follow-up continued for 48 weeks. Assay threshold verified in NCT044395390/51 in the registered primary per-protocol set (54 enrolled). HBsAg loss at least once: 11/54 (20.4%); six maintained loss through follow-up week 48On-treatment or transient antigen loss did not establish the off-all-treatment endpoint. Registry primary denominator is distinguished from the publication’s enrolled population. No deaths or serious adverse events; two stopped PegIFN
ALG-020572[24]. Double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 132 healthy participants (24 active/8 placebo); eight non-cirrhotic, HBeAg-negative, NA-suppressed CHB participants (6 active/2 placebo). CHB participants continued NASafety, pharmacokinetics and antiviral activity; planned up to seven 210-mg doses in CHB, with 12-week follow-up after the last dose. Trial stopped early for liver injuryALT > 10 × ULN attributed to drug-induced liver injury in 4/6 active-treated CHB participants after 2-7 doses; one hospitalized. No functional-cure estimateThree biopsies suggested drug-induced liver injury. All recovered without sequelae; development was terminated. Compound-specific serious toxicity must not be recast as a beneficial immune flare or generalized to all ASOs
Biomarker-guided NA withdrawal[25]. Multicentre randomized trial (2:1)90 Asian patients in the modified ITT analysis: 60 stopped and 30 continued NA. HBsAg < 200 IU/mL, suppressed HBV DNA ≥ 12 months, and undetectable HBV RNA or HBcrAg; cirrhosis excludedPublished analysis: Cumulative HBsAg loss through 144 weeks. Qualitative HBsAg negativity; numerical loss threshold NR. Registry NCT04519359 lists a 72-week primary endpointCumulative HBsAg loss 25.9% vs 4.2% (P = 0.013); raw event n/N NR. In the stop arm, 16/60 restarted NA; no serious adverse events were reportedCumulative estimates are not raw proportions. Supports a selected withdrawal strategy, not isolated validation of RNA/HBcrAg added value or a broadly applicable safe-stopping rule
Table 2 Selected prediction models by intended use and validation setting
Model/intended use
Population, events and prediction timing
Discrimination and validation
Calibration/overall accuracy
Development and missing data
Thresholds and limits for clinical use
GOLDEN[26]: Longitudinal discriminant analysis; HBsAg loss during NA therapyChina: Training 2835/61 events; geographic validation 3957/112 events; 173/6792 overall. qHBsAg every 6 months; loss < 0.05 IU/mL twice ≥ 6 months apart. Median follow-up 65.6 months; 5-year incidence 2.4%AUROC: Training 0.981 (95%CI 0.974-0.987); validation 0.979 (0.974-0.983). Overall PPV 26.2%; mean prediction lead time 18.9 months among correctly predicted HBsAg-loss casesCalibration plots for 5-year persistence of HBsAg in Supplementary Figure S5 of the original report[26]; slope/intercept not extractedNanfang Hospital training; 49 other centers validation; fivefold cross-validation. ≥ 2 qHBsAg samples ≥ 6 months apart required; explicit imputation strategy not located in examined main textScore > 0.95 at any follow-up identified favorable trajectories; 5-year loss 17.0% training/29.1% validation. Dynamic outcome-proximal prediction differs from a baseline regimen-selection rule. Landmark evaluation is needed before treatment allocation; this audit does not establish leakage
Dong et al[36]: LightGBM; rapid on-treatment PegIFN responseInactive HBeAg-negative Chinese patients, baseline HBsAg < 1000 IU/mL. Development n = 2882/541 events; training 2017, test 865; external 167/33 events. Baseline/week-12 inputs predict week-24 HBsAg < 0.05 IU/mL plus DNA < 20 IU/mLAUROC training 0.902 (95%CI 0.881-0.923); internal test 0.891; external 0.917 (0.850-0.983). External precision 0.547, sensitivity 0.879, specificity 0.821Brier score 0.091 and decision curves reported; Brier is overall predictive error, not a stand-alone calibration assessment. Calibration slope/intercept not located in examined text70:30 stratified split; tenfold cross-validation; six selected predictors. Variables > 20% missing excluded; random-forest imputation; training-based normalization. Full nesting of preprocessing within resampling not established from reportProposed probability < 0.3 PegIFN stopping rule; no prospective impact trial. Week-12 ALT/HBsAg ratio dominated SHAP. Week-24 response is not sustained off-treatment cure; patients already cleared by week 12 were not explicitly excluded. Model-choice discussion considers external performance, limiting a strictly untouched-test interpretation
SHAN/FLASH-N[38]: Baseline prediction of sustained HBsAg loss with PegIFNChinese HBeAg-negative patients: Derivation 202/94 events; overlapping advantaged subgroup 114/58. SHAN training/test 142/60; external 183, including 117 advantaged patients. Baseline predictors; HBsAg < 0.05 IU/mL sustained ≥ 24 weeks after cessation. External event counts not extractedSHAN AUC training 0.908 (95%CI 0.860-0.955), test 0.949 (0.898-0.999), external 0.861 (0.805-0.916). FLASH-N AUC 0.920; bootstrap-corrected 0.889; external 0.800 (0.716-0.884)Internal calibration plots and internal/external decision curves reported. External calibration plot or slope not identified in the examined body. Decision curves estimate net benefit; no impact trial48 candidates; univariate screening, tenfold LASSO and stepwise logistic regression; bootstrap/Firth correction for FLASH-N. Key missing data, > 10 missing variables or absent follow-up excluded; MICE for remaining missingness. Full fold-wise nesting not establishedSHAN uses ln(HBsAg+1), age, sex and neutrophil percentage; FLASH-N adds AFP/LDH. Retrospective, selected PegIFN recipients; 524/726 initially eligible patients excluded. No prospectively tested treatment-allocation threshold or comparative regimen selector
FC-48w[37]: Baseline Cox-derived score; HBsAg loss during PegIFN add-on377 Chinese NA-suppressed, non-cirrhotic HBeAg-negative patients; development five centres 229/41 events, external five other centres 148/30. Baseline age, HBsAg and ALT; 48-week PegIFN plus NA. Off-treatment durability not establishedAUC development 0.842 (95%CI 0.788-0.887); external 0.852 (0.785-0.905). Validation HBsAg loss: Low 2/73, intermediate 17/55, high 11/20Calibration assessment not identified in examined main text. Risk-stratum separation does not establish calibration of individual probabilitiesUnivariate screening followed by forward stepwise Cox regression. 485 screened; 38 declined and 70 lost to follow-up excluded. Imputation strategy not identified in examined body. Most patients had HBsAg < 1500 IU/mLScore = 0.008 × ALT (U/L) - 0.039 × age (years) - 0.002 × HBsAg (IU/mL). Derivation cutoffs -2.7/-1.3 target ≥ 90% sensitivity/≥ 85% specificity. Prognostic strata among PegIFN recipients; suggested treatment choices not prospectively tested against usual care or another regimen
REACH-B[44]: Cox-derived points score; HCC in untreated CHB3584 untreated non-cirrhotic Taiwanese patients/131 HCC; external Hong Kong/Korea 1505/111 HCC. Baseline sex, age, ALT, HBeAg, HBV DNA; 3-year, 5-year, 10-year horizonsExternal AUROC 0.811 (95%CI 0.790-0.831), 0.796 (0.775-0.816), 0.769 (0.747-0.790) at 3/5/10 years. Later post-loss validation: 5-year AUC 0.64 (95%CI 0.52-0.75), n = 1200/23 HCC[47]Predicted-vs-observed calibration plots, Figures 1 and 2. Correlations at 3/5/10 years 0.973/0.942/0.994; correlation alone is not equivalent to calibration slope/interceptIndependent hospital validation including 277 cirrhotic patients; separate non-cirrhotic analysis. Development median follow-up 12.0 years; validation mean 7.3 years. Missing-data strategy not located in examined main text17-point score estimates continuous absolute risk; not developed as a post-HBsAg-loss surveillance stopping rule. Treatment and loss alter distributions/meaning of virological inputs
PAGE-B[45]: Cox-derived points score; HCC during ETV/TDFCaucasian patients: Derivation 1325/51 HCC; external ninth-center validation 490/34 HCC. Age, sex, platelets at treatment initiation; 5-year horizon. Median follow-up 50 months overallC-index derivation 0.82; bootstrap 0.81; external validation 0.82. Confidence intervals not provided in the examined main text. Later post-loss validation: 5-year AUC 0.62 (95%CI 0.49-0.75)[47]; cirrhosis comparative evaluation C-index 0.605 (0.568-0.644)[50]Calibration plots for 5-year HCC-free probability in derivation and validation (Supplementary Figure 1A/B of the original report[45]); observed risk strata also assessedMultiple imputation: 10 datasets, predictor selection in > 50%, Rubin pooling; 1000 bootstrap samples; geographic holdout≤ 9, 10-17, ≥ 18: 5-year HCC 0%/3%/17% in derivation and 0%/4%/16% in validation. Developed during continuing antiviral treatment; a low score alone does not validate stopping surveillance after cure. Cohort overlaps the long-term PAGE-B report[2]
aMAP[46]: Cox-derived score; HCC across liver-disease etiologies17374 participants; training 3688/95 HCC; nine validation cohorts 13686/536 HCC (sum of Table 1). Age, sex, albumin, bilirubin, platelets. Generally 5-year horizon; one cohort 3 yearsTraining C-index 0.82 (95%CI 0.77-0.86). CHB validation 0.82-0.87; e.g., European PAGE-B 0.82 (0.78-0.86). Cirrhotic subgroup values 0.61-0.83. Later post-loss validation: 5-year AUC 0.73 (95%CI 0.63-0.84)[47]; cirrhosis comparative evaluation C-index 0.603 (0.564-0.641)[50]Observed-vs-predicted calibration plots for training and all validation cohorts (Figure 2); no slope/intercept extractedMixed treated HBV/HCV and non-viral cohorts. Available scores: 3662 training and 13324 validation; imputation method not located in examined main textCutoffs 50/60; validation NPV 99.3%-100% at 50, PPV 6.6%-15.7% at 60. Neither broad etiologic validation nor low observed incidence establishes a post-HBsAg-loss stopping threshold; no treatment-allocation role
PLAN-B[49]: Gradient boosting; HCC during NA treatmentTraining 6051; external Korean 5817 and Caucasian PAGE-B 1640. Ten baseline parameters; HCC follow-up reported through 8 years. Event counts and complete input list not retrievable from primary sources examinedC-index training 0.79; external Korean 0.79, Caucasian 0.81. No significant advantage over modified PAGE-B in Caucasians (P = 0.42); confidence intervals not retrievable from sources examined. Later cirrhosis comparative evaluation C-index 0.638 (95%CI 0.600-0.675)[50]; independence from all original cohorts should not be assumedPrimary abstract explicitly reports a satisfactory calibration plot. Numerical calibration parameters not retrievable from sources examinedIndependent geographic cohorts on ETV/TDF. Missing-data, tuning and internal-validation details not retrievable from primary sources examinedMinimal-risk group 11.2% Korean/8.8% Caucasian; < 0.5% HCC by 8 years. Not a post-seroclearance model. Ethnic labels do not establish viral genotype; between-cohort C-index comparisons do not measure calibration
PLAN-B-CURE[39]: Gradient boosting; composite liver-related outcomes after HBsAg lossTraining 944, internal validation 1102 (Korea), external 2741 (Hong Kong). Seven inputs: Age, sex, diabetes, alcohol, cirrhosis, albumin, platelets. Korean cohort: 123 composite events over median 55.2 months; 1.1%/person-yearTraining C-index 0.82, AUROC 0.86, AUPRC 0.53. Primary abstract states replication in both validation cohorts; separate values/confidence intervals not retrievable from primary sources examinedHosmer-Lemeshow P > 0.05 reported. Non-significance does not establish accurate individual risk estimates; slope/intercept not retrievable from sources examinedSix Korean centers plus Hong Kong database, seroclearance 2000-2022. Complete horizon-specific, event-split and missing-data methods not retrievable from primary sources examinedOutcome combines HCC, decompensation and liver-related death; not interchangeable with HCC risk. No verified threshold for withdrawing HCC surveillance. 123 events apply to Korea, not the total 4787. Full-text availability is an audit limitation, not evidence of deficient reporting
CAMP-B[48]: Cox-derived points score; HCC after HBsAg seroclearanceKorean development 3476/102 HCC, 24019 person-years; Hong Kong external validation 5255/85 HCC. Cirrhosis, age ≥ 50, male sex, platelets < 150000/mm3 after HBsAg loss; 5-year, 10-year, 15-year horizonsDevelopment time-dependent AUC 0.782/0.817/0.825 at 5/10/15 years; external 0.785/0.771/0.796. AUC confidence intervals not retrievable from examined primary abstractCalibration details not retrievable from examined primary abstract; publisher full text inaccessible. This is an access limitation, not proof of non-reportingRetrospective development at two Korean hospitals with geographic external validation in Hong Kong. Multivariable Cox model. Missing-data and internal-validation details not retrievable from examined abstractPoints: Cirrhosis, 3; age ≥ 50 years, 2; male sex, 3; low platelets (< 150000/mm3), 1. External low/intermediate/high annual HCC incidence 0.07%/0.37%/0.90%; exact stratum cutoffs not extracted. Dedicated post-loss prediction does not establish safe surveillance withdrawal


Write to the Help Desk