Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Clin Cases. Aug 16, 2026; 14(23): 122960
Published online Aug 16, 2026. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.122960
Published online Aug 16, 2026. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.122960
Table 1 Details of antiemetic regimens in the two study groups
| Group A (aprepitant + ondansetron + dexamethasone) | Group B (ondansetron + dexamethasone) |
| On day 1 (half hour before CCRT) | |
| Inj. ondansetron 8 mg IV | Inj. ondansetron 8 mg IV |
| Inj. dexamethasone 12 mg IV | Inj. dexamethasone 12 mg IV |
| Cap aprepitant 125 mg OD | Cap placebo OD |
| After CCRT | |
| Tab. ondansetron 8 mg | Tab. ondansetron 8 mg |
| On day 2, 3, 4, and 5 | |
| Cap Aprepitant 80 mg OD on day 2, 3 | Cap placebo OD on day 2, 3 |
| Tab ondansetron 8 mg BD on days 2, 3, 4, and 5 | Tab ondansetron 8 mg BD on days 2, 3, 4, and 5 |
Table 2 Baseline demographic & disease characteristics of the two study groups, n (%)/mean ± SD/median (range)
| Characteristics | Group A, n = 43 | Group B, n = 43 | P value |
| Age (years) | 59.93 ± 9.18 | 55.12 ± 10.38 | 0.02 |
| Males | 39 (90.7) | 38 (88.4) | 0.73 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 22.42 ± 1.11 | 22.84 ± 1.08 | 0.08 |
| ECOG performance | |||
| 0 | 5 (11.62) | 6 (13.95) | |
| 1 | 38 (88.4) | 37 (86) | 0.75 |
| Tumor stage | |||
| Stage III | 19 (44.19) | 17 (39.53) | 0.67 |
| Stage IV A | 23 (53.49) | 24 (55.81) | 0.83 |
| Stage IV B | 1 (2.33) | 2 (4.65) | 0.56 |
| Tumor location | |||
| Oral cavity | 2 (4.65) | 8 (18.60) | 0.04 |
| Oropharynx | 34 (79.07) | 26 (60.47) | 0.06 |
| Hypopharynx | 0 (0.00) | 2 (4.65) | 0.16 |
| Larynx | 7 (16.28) | 7 (16.28) | 1.00 |
| History of smoking | |||
| No. of smokers | 42 (97.67) | 39 (90.70) | 0.17 |
| No. of years of smoking | 30 (1-55) | 25 (0.5-40) | 0.01 |
| No. of bidis smoked | 20 (5-40) | 20 (2-50) | 0.83 |
| No. of hukka smokers | 2 (4.65) | 0 (0.00) | |
| History of alcohol | 34 (79.07) | 27 (62.79) | 0.1 |
| Presence of comorbidities | 9 (20.93) | 4 (9.30) | 0.1 |
Table 3 Secondary efficacy outcomes, n/N (%)
| Efficacy parameter | Acute-phase | Delayed-phase | ||||
| Group A | Group B | P value | Group A | Group B | P value | |
| Complete protection | 42/43 (97.7) | 35/43 (81.4) | 0.014 | 33/43 (76.7) | 22/43 (51.2) | 0.013 |
| Degree of nausea as per CTCAE criteria1 | ||||||
| Grade 1 | 5/43 (11.63) | 4/43 (9.30) | 0.72 | 9/43 (20.93) | 17/43 (39.53) | 0.06 |
| Grade 2 | 0/43 | 12/43 (27.90) | 0.0001 | 5/43 (11.63) | 11/43 (25.58) | 0.09 |
| Degree of vomiting as per CTCAE criteria2 | ||||||
| Grade 1 | 0/43 | 3/43 (6.8) | 0.07 | 1/43 (2.3) | 0/43 | 0.31 |
| Grade 2 | 0/43 | 3/43 (6.8) | 0.07 | 3/43 (6.8) | 9/43 (20.9) | 0.06 |
Table 4 Degree (intensity) of nausea during acute and delayed-phases in both the groups as per MASSC Antiemesis Tool Scale, mean ± SD
| Phase of emesis | Group A | Group B | P value |
| Acute- phase | 0.65 ± 1.85 | 2.49 ± 3.37 | 0.004 |
| Delayed-phase | |||
| Day 2 | 0.76 ± 1.97 | 1.90 ± 3.00 | 0.05 |
| Day 3 | 0.53 ± 1.77 | 2.30 ± 3.09 | 0.002 |
| Day 4 | 0.54 ± 1.75 | 2.18 ± 3.11 | 0.004 |
| Day 5 | 0.90 ± 2.30 | 1.53 ± 2.74 | 0.210 |
Table 5 Adverse events reported in the two study groups, n (%)
| Symptoms | Group A | Group B | P value |
| Reduced appetite | 19 (44.1) | 28 (65.1) | 0.52 |
| Abdominal discomfort | 16 (37.2) | 17 (39.5) | 0.82 |
| Generalized weakness | 9 (20.9) | 7 (16.2) | 0.58 |
| Constipation | 8 (18.6) | 12 (27.9) | 0.31 |
| Headache | 6 (13.9) | 5 (11.6) | 0.75 |
| Diarrhoea | 4 (9.3) | 7 (16.2) | 0.33 |
| Abdominal discomfort with flatulence | 3 (6.9) | 4 (9.3) | 0.69 |
| Dizziness | 3 (6.9) | 1 (2.3) | 0.31 |
| Ghabrahat | 0 (0.0) | 2 (4.6) | 0.15 |
- Citation: Gupta N, Sehgal S, Mittal N. Aprepitant as add-on to standard antiemetic regimen for concurrent chemoradiotherapy induced nausea vomiting in head and neck cancer. World J Clin Cases 2026; 14(23): 122960
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2307-8960/full/v14/i23/122960.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.122960