BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Review
Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Clin Cases. Jul 26, 2026; 14(21): 121907
Published online Jul 26, 2026. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.121907
Table 1 Correlations between serum dickkopf-1 and indices of disease activity, inflammation, and autoimmunity in rheumatoid arthritis
Parameter
Correlation finding
Ref.
DKK-1 vs DAS-28r = 0.960 (very strong positive)Ali et al[9], Juarez et al[54], Fang et al[55]
DKK-1 vs DAS-28 (Spearman)rho = 0.75Abdulaziz et al[56], Coras et al[57]
DKK-1 vs CRPr = 0.640 (significant positive)Santos et al[11], Sadek et al[42], Coras et al[57]
DKK-1 vs ESRr = 0.498 (significant positive)Santos et al[11], Sadek et al[42], Coras et al[57]
DKK-1 vs RF r = 0.473 (significant positive)Ali et al[9], Santos et al[11]
DKK-1 vs Anti-CRP antibodiesr = 0.478 (significant positive)Ali et al[9], Santos et al[11]
DKK-1 vs RAr = 0.876 (very strong positive)Santos et al[11]
DKK-1 vs steinbrocker functional gradeHigher levels in class III (4689-8092 pg/mL)Ma et al[8], Ali et al[9], Sadek et al[42], Juarez et al[54]
Diagnostic cut-off2726.97 pg/mL; sensitivity of 98.18%, specificity of 100% for active RA by DAS-28Procaccia et al[58], Bagherzadeh-Fard et al[59], McWilliams et al[60], Pertsinidou et al[61]
Table 2 Comparative roles of imaging modalities and dickkopf-1 in rheumatoid arthritis
Parameter
Ultrasound
Radiography
MRI
DKK-1
Detects early synovitisYes (PDUS best)NoYesIndirectly
Detects bone marrow edemaNoNoYes (strongest predictor)No
Sensitivity in eRAHighLowVery highModerate-high
Predicts future damageYes (persistent PDUS)Yes (if baseline erosions)Yes (BME)Yes (erosions, JSN)
Remission assessmentSubclinical synovitisNo roleConfirms deep remissionOngoing bone injury risk
Correlation with DKK-1PDUS: ESR, CRP, DKK-1RF, ACPA, DKK-1BME: Erosive risk markersN/A
Treatment monitoringExcellentPoorGood (costly)Good; falls with biologics
Key limitationOperator dependentInsensitive early diseaseCost and accessAssay variability


Write to the Help Desk