BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Minireviews
Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Clin Cases. Jul 6, 2026; 14(19): 120233
Published online Jul 6, 2026. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.120233
Table 1 Key studies evaluating ultrasound-defined cardiac activity in pulseless electrical activity and pseudo-pulseless electrical activity
Ref.
Design/setting
Population
Ultrasound phenotype
Key outcomes
Interpretation, limitations, and strength of evidence
Gaspari et al[3], 2016Prospective, multicentre observational; ED and OHCAn = 793; non-shockable arrests (PEA + asystole)Cardiac activity present vs absent on POCUS during ACLSCardiac activity independently associated with survival to admission and discharge; survival to discharge exceedingly rare without activityLarge multicentre cohort; includes asystole; observational design limits causal inference
Gaspari et al[4], 2017Retrospective secondary analysis of prospective registryn = 225; PEA patients with cardiac activityOrganized vs disorganized cardiac activityOrganized activity associated with higher ROSC and survival to admission; differential association with vasoactive escalation (hypothesis-generating)Non-randomized; subject to indication and selection bias; not designed to evaluate treatment efficacy
Devia Jaramillo et al[18], 2020Single-center observational cohort; ED (Colombia)n = 108; cardiac arrestsPseudo-PEA vs true PEA vs other rhythmsPseudo-PEA associated with higher ROSC and survival to discharge than true PEASingle-center ED cohort; favorable case mix may limit generalizability
Kedan et al[5], 2020Systematic review10 studies; ED and IHCACardiac activity on POCUS (binary)Consistent association between cardiac activity and ROSC and short-term survivalHeterogeneous definitions and study designs; limited neurologic outcome data
Blyth et al[6], 2012Systematic review12 observational studiesCardiac activity during arrestCardiac activity predicts ROSC and survival to admissionOlder studies; variability in ultrasound timing and protocols
Tsou et al[7], 2017Systematic review and meta-analysis15 studies; > 1200 patientsCardiac activity on focused echocardiographyModerate prognostic accuracy for ROSC and discharge; higher accuracy for survival to admissionHeterogeneity across studies; not sufficient as a sole criterion for termination decisions
Rabjohns et al[20], 2020Narrative review; ED-focusedReview of 9 pseudo-PEA articlesPseudo-PEA vs true PEA; diagnostic, therapeutic, and prognostic literatureSummarized evidence supporting ultrasound-based diagnosis, mechanism-directed treatment, and better prognosis of pseudo-PEA than true PEAUseful ED-oriented synthesis, but narrative design and small underlying studies limit certainty
Jian et al[19], 2025Systematic review and meta-analysis (PEA-specific)PEA patients onlyCardiac activity on POCUSHighest prognostic accuracy for survival to admission; moderate for ROSC and discharge; inadequate alone for termination decisionsPEA-specific synthesis strengthens relevance, but definitions of “cardiac activity” remain heterogeneous
Elhalwagy et al[21], 2025Systematic review and meta-analysis12 studies; 494355 patientsPseudo-PEA contextualized within broader PEA vs asystole literaturePEA showed better survival and neurologic outcomes than asystole; authors suggest pseudo-PEA may partly explain this differenceImportant updated synthesis, but indirect for pseudo-PEA because much of the pooled comparison is PEA vs asystole rather than directly pseudo-PEA vs true PEA
Latsios et al[8], 2025Narrative reviewED and ICU arrestsPseudo-PEA vs standstillReinforces prognostic separation and integration with perfusion markersNarrative synthesis; does not provide pooled outcome estimates


Write to the Help Desk