Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Clin Cases. Jul 6, 2026; 14(19): 120233
Published online Jul 6, 2026. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.120233
Published online Jul 6, 2026. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.120233
Table 1 Key studies evaluating ultrasound-defined cardiac activity in pulseless electrical activity and pseudo-pulseless electrical activity
| Ref. | Design/setting | Population | Ultrasound phenotype | Key outcomes | Interpretation, limitations, and strength of evidence |
| Gaspari et al[3], 2016 | Prospective, multicentre observational; ED and OHCA | n = 793; non-shockable arrests (PEA + asystole) | Cardiac activity present vs absent on POCUS during ACLS | Cardiac activity independently associated with survival to admission and discharge; survival to discharge exceedingly rare without activity | Large multicentre cohort; includes asystole; observational design limits causal inference |
| Gaspari et al[4], 2017 | Retrospective secondary analysis of prospective registry | n = 225; PEA patients with cardiac activity | Organized vs disorganized cardiac activity | Organized activity associated with higher ROSC and survival to admission; differential association with vasoactive escalation (hypothesis-generating) | Non-randomized; subject to indication and selection bias; not designed to evaluate treatment efficacy |
| Devia Jaramillo et al[18], 2020 | Single-center observational cohort; ED (Colombia) | n = 108; cardiac arrests | Pseudo-PEA vs true PEA vs other rhythms | Pseudo-PEA associated with higher ROSC and survival to discharge than true PEA | Single-center ED cohort; favorable case mix may limit generalizability |
| Kedan et al[5], 2020 | Systematic review | 10 studies; ED and IHCA | Cardiac activity on POCUS (binary) | Consistent association between cardiac activity and ROSC and short-term survival | Heterogeneous definitions and study designs; limited neurologic outcome data |
| Blyth et al[6], 2012 | Systematic review | 12 observational studies | Cardiac activity during arrest | Cardiac activity predicts ROSC and survival to admission | Older studies; variability in ultrasound timing and protocols |
| Tsou et al[7], 2017 | Systematic review and meta-analysis | 15 studies; > 1200 patients | Cardiac activity on focused echocardiography | Moderate prognostic accuracy for ROSC and discharge; higher accuracy for survival to admission | Heterogeneity across studies; not sufficient as a sole criterion for termination decisions |
| Rabjohns et al[20], 2020 | Narrative review; ED-focused | Review of 9 pseudo-PEA articles | Pseudo-PEA vs true PEA; diagnostic, therapeutic, and prognostic literature | Summarized evidence supporting ultrasound-based diagnosis, mechanism-directed treatment, and better prognosis of pseudo-PEA than true PEA | Useful ED-oriented synthesis, but narrative design and small underlying studies limit certainty |
| Jian et al[19], 2025 | Systematic review and meta-analysis (PEA-specific) | PEA patients only | Cardiac activity on POCUS | Highest prognostic accuracy for survival to admission; moderate for ROSC and discharge; inadequate alone for termination decisions | PEA-specific synthesis strengthens relevance, but definitions of “cardiac activity” remain heterogeneous |
| Elhalwagy et al[21], 2025 | Systematic review and meta-analysis | 12 studies; 494355 patients | Pseudo-PEA contextualized within broader PEA vs asystole literature | PEA showed better survival and neurologic outcomes than asystole; authors suggest pseudo-PEA may partly explain this difference | Important updated synthesis, but indirect for pseudo-PEA because much of the pooled comparison is PEA vs asystole rather than directly pseudo-PEA vs true PEA |
| Latsios et al[8], 2025 | Narrative review | ED and ICU arrests | Pseudo-PEA vs standstill | Reinforces prognostic separation and integration with perfusion markers | Narrative synthesis; does not provide pooled outcome estimates |
- Citation: Kataria S, Goel S, Juneja D. Pseudo-pulseless electrical activity: A distinct hemodynamic state in cardiac arrest and its implications for resuscitation. World J Clin Cases 2026; 14(19): 120233
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2307-8960/full/v14/i19/120233.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.120233