Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Clin Cases. Jun 26, 2026; 14(18): 120219
Published online Jun 26, 2026. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.120219
Published online Jun 26, 2026. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.120219
Table 1 Contemporary catheter-based options for acute pulmonary embolism
| Device/system | Primary mechanism | Key technical characteristics | Typical venous access | PE indication status | Main advantages | Main limitations/risks |
| Pigtail catheters/peripheral balloon catheters | Mechanical clot disruption (fragmentation ± balloon maceration) | Small profile catheters (historically used); manual rotation over a wire; can be paired with local lytic infusion | Femoral or jugular | Not applicable | Simple, widely available, low cost; may provide rapid partial recanalization as a bridge | Fragmentation can push clot distally and potentially worsen obstruction; largely replaced by dedicated systems |
| Cragg-McNamara infusion catheter (Medtronic) | CDT | Multi-side-hole infusion catheter; multiple working lengths and infusion segments | Femoral | Yes | Dedicated infusion design; reliable local delivery without need for complex mechanical components | Requires prolonged infusion (commonly 12-24 hours); bleeding risk still present |
| Fountain infusion catheter (Merit Medical) | CDT | Multi-side-hole infusion system; variable infusion lengths | Femoral | No | Practical and relatively cost-efficient | Less robust PE-specific clinical evidence compared with some alternatives |
| Uni-Fuse (AngioDynamics) | CDT | Multi-side-hole infusion catheter; multiple infusion segment lengths | Femoral | Yes | Broad and uniform thrombolytic dispersion through side holes | Requires monitored infusion over many hours; bleeding risk persists |
| Pulse-spray infusion catheter (AngioDynamics) | CDT (pulsed delivery) | Side-hole catheter allowing bolus/pulsed lytic administration; can be used with fragmentation | Femoral | No | Can enhance drug penetration and shorten initial delivery phase | Limited PE-specific outcome data; still requires thrombolytic exposure |
| Bashir catheter (Thrombolex) | Hybrid: Mechanical clot disruption + local lytic delivery | Expandable basket with multiple micro-infusion points to distribute lytic within thrombus | Femoral | No | Multi-point drug delivery directly inside thrombus; may improve penetration | Limited clinical dataset and adoption; still involves thrombolytic use |
| EkoSonic (Boston Scientific) | Ultrasound-assisted CDT (USAT) | Dual-lumen catheter: Ultrasound core + thrombolytic infusion lumen; multiple treatment-zone lengths | Femoral or jugular | Yes | Ultrasound energy may loosen fibrin architecture, improving lytic penetration; allows lower-dose/shorter regimens | Higher cost; incremental clinical advantage vs standard CDT remains debated |
| Aspirex (Becton Dickinson) | Mechanical fragmentation + aspiration | Aspiration catheter designed for thrombus extraction (more often peripheral use) | Femoral | Yes, in European Union, not in United States | Straightforward concept; avoids systemic thrombolysis | May be less effective for organized/older thrombus; PE-specific evidence limited |
| AngioJet (Boston Scientific) | Rheolytic thrombectomy ± “power pulse” lytic injection | High-pressure saline jets fragment thrombus and create suction (Bernoulli effect); can be combined with local lytic injection | Femoral or jugular | Yes, in European Union; FDA boxed warning for PE | Rapid debulking with option for pharmacomechanical approach | Bradyarrhythmias, hemolysis, hemodynamic instability; safety concerns led to boxed warning in the United States |
| AngioVac (AngioDynamics) | Aspiration with extracorporeal veno-venous bypass | Large-bore aspiration cannula connected to external filtration and reinfusion circuit; requires perfusion support | Femoral + jugular (dual access) | No | Allows aspiration with reinfusion and limited net blood loss; useful for RA/IVC thrombus | Not designed for pulmonary artery thrombectomy; requires perfusion team; limited role in acute PE |
| AlphaVac (AngioDynamics) | Large-bore aspiration without extracorporeal support | Manual aspiration system; no bypass circuit; deliverable cannula with multiple configurations | Femoral or jugular | No | Avoids perfusion team; less complex than AngioVac | Clinical experience still limited; not established for chronic PE |
| FlowTriever (Inari Medical) | Large-bore aspiration ± mechanical extraction | Large aspiration catheters; nitinol mesh discs for clot engagement; optional blood filtration/reinfusion (FlowSaver) | Femoral or jugular | Yes | Effective for high clot burden; avoids thrombolytics; strong prospective trial and registry evidence | Large and relatively stiff system can limit distal branch reach; requires operator experience |
| Indigo aspiration system (Penumbra) | Aspiration + mechanical thrombus disruption | Continuous suction pump + separator wire; smaller, more flexible catheters; optional Lightning Suction-Control Technology | Femoral or jugular | Yes | Better navigation into distal pulmonary branches; automated suction control may reduce blood loss | No blood reinfusion/filtering; effectiveness may be lower for highly organized clot |
Table 2 Expected complications of catheter-based therapies for acute pulmonary embolism
| Complication | Approximate frequency | Likely mechanism/trigger | Practical management |
| Acute hemodynamic decompensation (sudden hypotension/collapse) | Uncommon | Distal embolization after clot fragmentation increasing pulmonary vascular resistance; RV strain from prolonged catheter manipulation; arrhythmia or acute RV failure during intervention | Escalate vasopressors/inotropes; terminate or simplify catheter maneuvers; consider rescue thrombolysis if appropriate; mechanical support (e.g., VA-ECMO) when refractory |
| Mechanical injury to the tricuspid valve | Uncommon | Inadvertent aggressive valve crossing or repeated catheter passes causing acute tricuspid regurgitation or leaflet/chordal damage | Remove/withdraw catheter; echocardiographic evaluation; cardiac surgical consultation if severe structural injury |
| Cardiac perforation with pericardial tamponade | Rare | Guidewire or catheter perforation (RA/RV) during manipulation | Immediate pericardiocentesis; hemodynamic stabilization; surgical repair if persistent bleeding |
| Hemoptysis/pulmonary hemorrhage | Uncommon | Pulmonary artery branch injury (wire perforation or catheter trauma); reperfusion injury after rapid flow restoration; thrombolysis-related bleeding | Airway protection and ventilatory support (selective intubation if needed); stop/limit thrombolytics; reverse anticoagulation when required; endovascular measures (balloon tamponade, selective coiling) in focal injury |
| Pulmonary artery dissection (large branch) | Rare | Excessive catheter torque, stiff wire trauma, or device advancement in tortuous anatomy | Often conservative monitoring if stable; balloon angioplasty if flow-limiting; CTA follow-up when indicated |
| Systemic (paradoxical) embolization | Rare | Embolus passage through intracardiac shunt (e.g., PFO) or other right-to-left communication | Treat based on embolic territory (stroke/limb/visceral); multidisciplinary management; consider evaluation for shunt closure after stabilization |
| Non-pulmonary major bleeding | Uncommon | Thrombolytic exposure (CDT/USAT), excessive anticoagulation, or access-site bleeding | Stop thrombolysis; reverse heparin if necessary; manage bleeding source specifically (GI, GU, retroperitoneal, etc.) |
| Hemolysis and bradyarrhythmias (device-related) | Uncommon (device-dependent) | Mainly described with rheolytic systems (e.g., AngioJet): Hemolysis-mediated release of vasoactive mediators | Limit activation time; monitor rhythm closely; treat bradycardia/AV block; discontinue device if instability occurs |
| Vascular access complications (hematoma, pseudoaneurysm, venous injury) | Uncommon | Large-bore sheaths (especially thrombectomy platforms), inadequate ultrasound guidance, prolonged procedure | Ultrasound-guided access; closure/pressure; transfusion if needed; vascular surgery/interventional radiology when severe |
| Contrast-associated acute kidney injury | Uncommon | High contrast volume in unstable patients or baseline CKD | Minimize contrast; hydration if feasible; avoid nephrotoxins; monitor creatinine |
Table 3 Major clinical trials and registries evaluating catheter-based therapies for acute pulmonary embolism
| Trial | Therapy/device | Study design | Population | Main findings |
| ULTIMA | UATh (EkoSonic) | RCT | Intermediate-risk PE | Significant improvement in RV/LV ratio at 24 hours compared with anticoagulation alone, without increased major bleeding |
| SEATTLE II | UATh | Prospective single-arm study | Massive and submassive PE | Improved RV function and pulmonary pressures, but higher thrombolytic dose associated with increased bleeding |
| OPTALYSE PE | UATh | Randomized dose-optimization trial | Intermediate-risk PE | Lower-dose and shorter-duration thrombolysis improved RV function with favorable bleeding profile |
| SUNSET-sPE | UATh vs standard CDT | RCT | Intermediate-risk PE | Similar thrombus reduction between techniques with low major bleeding rates |
| CANARY | CDT vs anticoagulation | RCT | Intermediate–high-risk PE | Trial terminated early; interim data supported safety and feasibility of CDT |
| HI-PEITHO | UATh (EkoSonic) + anticoagulation vs anticoagulation alone | RCT | Intermediate-risk PE with RV dysfunction and cardiorespiratory distress | UATh significantly reduced the composite endpoint of PE-related death, hemodynamic decompensation/collapse or recurrent PE at 7 days (4.0% vs 10.3%) without increased major bleeding or intracranial hemorrhage |
| KNOCOUT PE | UATh | Prospective registry | Intermediate-high and high-risk PE | Low rates of major bleeding and intracranial hemorrhage with improved RV function |
| FLARE | FlowTriever thrombectomy | Prospective multicenter trial | Intermediate-risk PE | Significant reduction in RV/LV ratio with low major bleeding and minimal ICU utilization |
| FLASH | FlowTriever thrombectomy | Prospective registry | Real-world PE population | Confirmed safety and effectiveness with low adverse event rates |
| FLAME | FlowTriever vs contemporary therapies | Prospective comparative study | High-risk PE | Lower in-hospital adverse outcomes and mortality with thrombectomy |
| EXTRACT-PE | Indigo aspiration system | Prospective multicenter trial | Intermediate-risk PE | Significant reduction in RV strain with low major bleeding rates |
| PEERLESS | FlowTriever vs CDT | RCT | Intermediate-risk PE | Mechanical thrombectomy reduced clinical deterioration and ICU utilization without increasing bleeding |
| STORM-PE | Mechanical thrombectomy + anticoagulation vs anticoagulation | RCT | Intermediate–high-risk PE | Greater improvement in RV/LV ratio and thrombus burden without excess major adverse events |
Table 4 Emerging catheter technologies and investigational systems in pulmonary embolism intervention
| Device/platform | Concep/device principle | Regulatory position (United States/European Union) | Trial/registry name | Identifier | Sample size (n) |
| AlphaVac F18 (AngioDynamics) | Mechanical thrombectomy based on aspiration (no extracorporeal circuit) | FDA cleared; CE marked | APEX-AV | NCT05318092 | 122 |
| Helo PE (Endovascular Engineering) | Combined clot disruption + aspiration thrombectomy | Not approved (United States); not approved (European Union) | ENGULF | NCT05597891 | 25 |
| WOLF (Boston Scientific) | Controlled thrombus extraction using finger-like retrieval elements | Approved for peripheral arteries; not approved specifically for PE (United States); not approved (European Union) | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| JET (Abbott) | High-pressure saline jet to fragment thrombus and facilitate aspiration | Approved for peripheral arteries; not approved for PE (United States); not approved (European Union) | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| Laguna (Innova Vascular) | Hybrid mechanical disruption plus aspiration | Approved for peripheral arteries; not approved for PE (United States); not approved (European Union) | TRUST | NCT06041594 | 107 (estimated) |
| Cleaner Pro (Argon Medical Devices) | Pharmacomechanical approach combining thrombectomy with local lytic infusion capability | Approved for peripheral arteries; not approved for PE ((United States); not approved (European Union) | CLEAN-PE | NCT06189313 | 125 (estimated) |
| Katana (Akura Medical) | Rheolytic-powered aspiration with directional control features | Not approved (United States); not approved (European Union) | QUADRA-PE | NCT06672510 | 118 (estimated) |
| Magneto eTrieve (Magneto Thrombectomy Solutions) | Large-bore aspiration combined with electromechanical clot extraction | Not approved (United States); not approved (European Union) | Safety and Performance of Magneto PE Kit | NCT04949048 | 10 |
- Citation: Latsios G, Ktenopoulos N, Koliastasis L, Apostolos A, Kachrimanidis I, Vlachakis PK, Tolis E, Mantziaris V, Stroumpouli E, Tsalamandris S, Drakopoulou M, Synetos A, Tsioufis K, Toutouzas K. From anticoagulation to intervention: The expanding role of percutaneous therapies in pulmonary embolism. World J Clin Cases 2026; 14(18): 120219
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2307-8960/full/v14/i18/120219.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.120219