BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Minireviews
Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Clin Cases. Jun 26, 2026; 14(18): 120219
Published online Jun 26, 2026. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.120219
Table 1 Contemporary catheter-based options for acute pulmonary embolism
Device/system
Primary mechanism
Key technical characteristics
Typical venous access
PE indication status
Main advantages
Main limitations/risks
Pigtail catheters/peripheral balloon cathetersMechanical clot disruption (fragmentation ± balloon maceration)Small profile catheters (historically used); manual rotation over a wire; can be paired with local lytic infusionFemoral or jugularNot applicableSimple, widely available, low cost; may provide rapid partial recanalization as a bridgeFragmentation can push clot distally and potentially worsen obstruction; largely replaced by dedicated systems
Cragg-McNamara infusion catheter (Medtronic)CDTMulti-side-hole infusion catheter; multiple working lengths and infusion segmentsFemoralYesDedicated infusion design; reliable local delivery without need for complex mechanical componentsRequires prolonged infusion (commonly 12-24 hours); bleeding risk still present
Fountain infusion catheter (Merit Medical)CDTMulti-side-hole infusion system; variable infusion lengthsFemoralNoPractical and relatively cost-efficientLess robust PE-specific clinical evidence compared with some alternatives
Uni-Fuse (AngioDynamics)CDTMulti-side-hole infusion catheter; multiple infusion segment lengthsFemoralYesBroad and uniform thrombolytic dispersion through side holesRequires monitored infusion over many hours; bleeding risk persists
Pulse-spray infusion catheter (AngioDynamics)CDT (pulsed delivery)Side-hole catheter allowing bolus/pulsed lytic administration; can be used with fragmentationFemoralNoCan enhance drug penetration and shorten initial delivery phaseLimited PE-specific outcome data; still requires thrombolytic exposure
Bashir catheter (Thrombolex)Hybrid: Mechanical clot disruption + local lytic deliveryExpandable basket with multiple micro-infusion points to distribute lytic within thrombusFemoralNoMulti-point drug delivery directly inside thrombus; may improve penetrationLimited clinical dataset and adoption; still involves thrombolytic use
EkoSonic (Boston Scientific)Ultrasound-assisted CDT (USAT)Dual-lumen catheter: Ultrasound core + thrombolytic infusion lumen; multiple treatment-zone lengthsFemoral or jugularYesUltrasound energy may loosen fibrin architecture, improving lytic penetration; allows lower-dose/shorter regimensHigher cost; incremental clinical advantage vs standard CDT remains debated
Aspirex (Becton Dickinson)Mechanical fragmentation + aspirationAspiration catheter designed for thrombus extraction (more often peripheral use)FemoralYes, in European Union, not in United StatesStraightforward concept; avoids systemic thrombolysisMay be less effective for organized/older thrombus; PE-specific evidence limited
AngioJet (Boston Scientific)Rheolytic thrombectomy ± “power pulse” lytic injectionHigh-pressure saline jets fragment thrombus and create suction (Bernoulli effect); can be combined with local lytic injectionFemoral or jugularYes, in European Union; FDA boxed warning for PERapid debulking with option for pharmacomechanical approachBradyarrhythmias, hemolysis, hemodynamic instability; safety concerns led to boxed warning in the United States
AngioVac (AngioDynamics)Aspiration with extracorporeal veno-venous bypassLarge-bore aspiration cannula connected to external filtration and reinfusion circuit; requires perfusion supportFemoral + jugular (dual access)NoAllows aspiration with reinfusion and limited net blood loss; useful for RA/IVC thrombusNot designed for pulmonary artery thrombectomy; requires perfusion team; limited role in acute PE
AlphaVac (AngioDynamics)Large-bore aspiration without extracorporeal supportManual aspiration system; no bypass circuit; deliverable cannula with multiple configurationsFemoral or jugularNoAvoids perfusion team; less complex than AngioVacClinical experience still limited; not established for chronic PE
FlowTriever (Inari Medical)Large-bore aspiration ± mechanical extractionLarge aspiration catheters; nitinol mesh discs for clot engagement; optional blood filtration/reinfusion (FlowSaver)Femoral or jugularYesEffective for high clot burden; avoids thrombolytics; strong prospective trial and registry evidenceLarge and relatively stiff system can limit distal branch reach; requires operator experience
Indigo aspiration system (Penumbra)Aspiration + mechanical thrombus disruptionContinuous suction pump + separator wire; smaller, more flexible catheters; optional Lightning Suction-Control TechnologyFemoral or jugularYesBetter navigation into distal pulmonary branches; automated suction control may reduce blood lossNo blood reinfusion/filtering; effectiveness may be lower for highly organized clot
Table 2 Expected complications of catheter-based therapies for acute pulmonary embolism
Complication
Approximate frequency
Likely mechanism/trigger
Practical management
Acute hemodynamic decompensation (sudden hypotension/collapse)UncommonDistal embolization after clot fragmentation increasing pulmonary vascular resistance; RV strain from prolonged catheter manipulation; arrhythmia or acute RV failure during interventionEscalate vasopressors/inotropes; terminate or simplify catheter maneuvers; consider rescue thrombolysis if appropriate; mechanical support (e.g., VA-ECMO) when refractory
Mechanical injury to the tricuspid valveUncommonInadvertent aggressive valve crossing or repeated catheter passes causing acute tricuspid regurgitation or leaflet/chordal damageRemove/withdraw catheter; echocardiographic evaluation; cardiac surgical consultation if severe structural injury
Cardiac perforation with pericardial tamponadeRareGuidewire or catheter perforation (RA/RV) during manipulationImmediate pericardiocentesis; hemodynamic stabilization; surgical repair if persistent bleeding
Hemoptysis/pulmonary hemorrhageUncommonPulmonary artery branch injury (wire perforation or catheter trauma); reperfusion injury after rapid flow restoration; thrombolysis-related bleedingAirway protection and ventilatory support (selective intubation if needed); stop/limit thrombolytics; reverse anticoagulation when required; endovascular measures (balloon tamponade, selective coiling) in focal injury
Pulmonary artery dissection (large branch)RareExcessive catheter torque, stiff wire trauma, or device advancement in tortuous anatomyOften conservative monitoring if stable; balloon angioplasty if flow-limiting; CTA follow-up when indicated
Systemic (paradoxical) embolizationRareEmbolus passage through intracardiac shunt (e.g., PFO) or other right-to-left communicationTreat based on embolic territory (stroke/limb/visceral); multidisciplinary management; consider evaluation for shunt closure after stabilization
Non-pulmonary major bleedingUncommonThrombolytic exposure (CDT/USAT), excessive anticoagulation, or access-site bleedingStop thrombolysis; reverse heparin if necessary; manage bleeding source specifically (GI, GU, retroperitoneal, etc.)
Hemolysis and bradyarrhythmias (device-related)Uncommon (device-dependent)Mainly described with rheolytic systems (e.g., AngioJet): Hemolysis-mediated release of vasoactive mediatorsLimit activation time; monitor rhythm closely; treat bradycardia/AV block; discontinue device if instability occurs
Vascular access complications (hematoma, pseudoaneurysm, venous injury)UncommonLarge-bore sheaths (especially thrombectomy platforms), inadequate ultrasound guidance, prolonged procedureUltrasound-guided access; closure/pressure; transfusion if needed; vascular surgery/interventional radiology when severe
Contrast-associated acute kidney injuryUncommonHigh contrast volume in unstable patients or baseline CKDMinimize contrast; hydration if feasible; avoid nephrotoxins; monitor creatinine
Table 3 Major clinical trials and registries evaluating catheter-based therapies for acute pulmonary embolism
Trial
Therapy/device
Study design
Population
Main findings
ULTIMAUATh (EkoSonic)RCTIntermediate-risk PESignificant improvement in RV/LV ratio at 24 hours compared with anticoagulation alone, without increased major bleeding
SEATTLE IIUAThProspective single-arm studyMassive and submassive PEImproved RV function and pulmonary pressures, but higher thrombolytic dose associated with increased bleeding
OPTALYSE PEUAThRandomized dose-optimization trialIntermediate-risk PELower-dose and shorter-duration thrombolysis improved RV function with favorable bleeding profile
SUNSET-sPEUATh vs standard CDTRCTIntermediate-risk PESimilar thrombus reduction between techniques with low major bleeding rates
CANARYCDT vs anticoagulationRCTIntermediate–high-risk PETrial terminated early; interim data supported safety and feasibility of CDT
HI-PEITHOUATh (EkoSonic) + anticoagulation vs anticoagulation aloneRCTIntermediate-risk PE with RV dysfunction and cardiorespiratory distressUATh significantly reduced the composite endpoint of PE-related death, hemodynamic decompensation/collapse or recurrent PE at 7 days (4.0% vs 10.3%) without increased major bleeding or intracranial hemorrhage
KNOCOUT PEUAThProspective registryIntermediate-high and high-risk PELow rates of major bleeding and intracranial hemorrhage with improved RV function
FLAREFlowTriever thrombectomyProspective multicenter trialIntermediate-risk PESignificant reduction in RV/LV ratio with low major bleeding and minimal ICU utilization
FLASHFlowTriever thrombectomyProspective registryReal-world PE populationConfirmed safety and effectiveness with low adverse event rates
FLAMEFlowTriever vs contemporary therapiesProspective comparative studyHigh-risk PELower in-hospital adverse outcomes and mortality with thrombectomy
EXTRACT-PEIndigo aspiration systemProspective multicenter trialIntermediate-risk PESignificant reduction in RV strain with low major bleeding rates
PEERLESSFlowTriever vs CDTRCTIntermediate-risk PEMechanical thrombectomy reduced clinical deterioration and ICU utilization without increasing bleeding
STORM-PEMechanical thrombectomy + anticoagulation vs anticoagulationRCTIntermediate–high-risk PEGreater improvement in RV/LV ratio and thrombus burden without excess major adverse events
Table 4 Emerging catheter technologies and investigational systems in pulmonary embolism intervention
Device/platform
Concep/device principle
Regulatory position (United States/European Union)
Trial/registry name
Identifier
Sample size (n)
AlphaVac F18 (AngioDynamics)Mechanical thrombectomy based on aspiration (no extracorporeal circuit)FDA cleared; CE markedAPEX-AVNCT05318092122
Helo PE (Endovascular Engineering)Combined clot disruption + aspiration thrombectomyNot approved (United States); not approved (European Union)ENGULFNCT0559789125
WOLF (Boston Scientific)Controlled thrombus extraction using finger-like retrieval elementsApproved for peripheral arteries; not approved specifically for PE (United States); not approved (European Union)N/AN/AN/A
JET (Abbott)High-pressure saline jet to fragment thrombus and facilitate aspirationApproved for peripheral arteries; not approved for PE (United States); not approved (European Union)N/AN/AN/A
Laguna (Innova Vascular)Hybrid mechanical disruption plus aspirationApproved for peripheral arteries; not approved for PE (United States); not approved (European Union)TRUSTNCT06041594107 (estimated)
Cleaner Pro (Argon Medical Devices)Pharmacomechanical approach combining thrombectomy with local lytic infusion capabilityApproved for peripheral arteries; not approved for PE ((United States); not approved (European Union)CLEAN-PENCT06189313125 (estimated)
Katana (Akura Medical)Rheolytic-powered aspiration with directional control featuresNot approved (United States); not approved (European Union)QUADRA-PENCT06672510118 (estimated)
Magneto eTrieve (Magneto Thrombectomy Solutions)Large-bore aspiration combined with electromechanical clot extractionNot approved (United States); not approved (European Union)Safety and Performance of Magneto PE KitNCT0494904810


Write to the Help Desk