Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Clin Cases. Jun 16, 2026; 14(17): 120192
Published online Jun 16, 2026. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v14.i17.120192
Published online Jun 16, 2026. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v14.i17.120192
Table 1 Core artificial intelligence techniques and their orthopaedic clinical applications
| AI technique | Description | Orthopaedic application |
| Machine learning | Algorithms that learn patterns from structured data | Outcome prediction, complication risk analysis |
| Deep learning | Multilayer neural networks analysing complex datasets | Fracture detection, tumour classification |
| Computer vision | Automated interpretation of medical images | Imaging diagnosis, surgical navigation |
| Radiomics | Quantitative extraction of imaging features | Tumour grading, infection differentiation |
| Natural language processing | Analysis of unstructured clinical text | EMR analysis, research data extraction |
| Predictive analytics | Statistical modelling for outcome estimation | Implant survivorship prediction |
| Multimodal AI | Integration of heterogeneous datasets | Precision orthopaedic decision-making |
| Explainable AI | Transparent model reasoning systems | Clinical trust and regulatory validation |
Table 2 Applications of artificial intelligence across orthopaedic subspecialties
| Subspecialty | AI Application | Clinical benefit |
| Trauma | Fracture detection | Reduced missed injuries |
| Spine | Surgical planning | Improved alignment accuracy |
| Arthroplasty | Implant sizing | Enhanced implant longevity |
| Sports medicine | Injury prediction | Optimised return-to-sport timing |
| Oncology | Tumour grading | Personalised treatment planning |
| Infection | Pathogen prediction | Targeted antimicrobial therapy |
| Paediatric orthopaedics | Growth modelling | Early deformity detection |
| Rehabilitation | Wearable monitoring | Personalised recovery plans |
Table 3 Advantages and current limitations of artificial intelligence in orthopaedics
| Advantages | Limitations |
| Improved diagnostic accuracy | Dataset bias |
| Reduced inter-observer variability | Limited external validation |
| Personalised treatment planning | High infrastructure cost |
| Faster workflow efficiency | Regulatory uncertainty |
| Predictive outcome modelling | Algorithm interpretability issues |
| Early complication detection | Data privacy concerns |
| Enhanced surgical precision | Learning curve for clinicians |
| Decision support | Risk of overreliance |
Table 4 Summary of artificial intelligence methodologies, validation status, and limitations in orthopaedic applications
| Orthopaedic domain | Common AI models | Dataset source | External validation | Clinical readiness | Common limitations |
| Fracture detection | CNN | Radiographs from hospital databases | Limited | Early clinical use in radiology workflows | Mostly single-centre studies, limited prospective validation |
| Arthroplasty planning | CNN, machine learning models | Imaging data and arthroplasty registries | Moderate | Integrated with robotic and templating systems | Variability in implant systems and dataset heterogeneity |
| Spine surgery | CNN, machine learning models | Radiographs, CT, MRI, and clinical records | Limited | Early clinical adoption | Predominantly retrospective datasets |
| Sports medicine | CNN, deep learning models | MRI datasets | Limited | Early clinical use | Small datasets, variability in imaging protocols |
| Orthopaedic oncology | Radiomics and CNN | MRI and CT imaging datasets | Limited | Experimental stage | Small sample sizes due to rare tumours |
| Infection prediction | Machine learning models | Clinical and laboratory datasets | Limited | Early decision-support use | Inconsistent diagnostic criteria and dataset imbalance |
| Surgical robotics and navigation | Computer vision and AI-assisted navigation | Intraoperative imaging and sensor data | Moderate | Used in robotic arthroplasty and spine surgery | High cost and limited widespread availability |
| Rehabilitation monitoring | Machine learning and wearable-based AI | Wearable sensor and gait data | Limited | Emerging clinical use | Lack of standardisation and long-term validation |
Table 5 Emerging technologies shaping the future of artificial intelligence in orthopaedics
| Technology | Potential clinical impact |
| Digital twin modelling | Virtual surgical simulation |
| Multimodal AI systems | Comprehensive disease prediction |
| Smart implants | Real-time implant monitoring |
| Federated learning | Secure multi-institution collaboration |
| Wearable integration | Continuous rehabilitation tracking |
| Robotic-AI hybrids | Ultra-precise surgical execution |
| Generative AI | Automated surgical planning |
| Continuous-learning models | Adaptive real-time decision support |
- Citation: Dwajan A, Patro DR, Agarwal A, Lalhmingmawii M. Artificial intelligence in orthopaedics: Clinical decision support, medical imaging, surgical planning, and outcome prediction. World J Clin Cases 2026; 14(17): 120192
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2307-8960/full/v14/i17/120192.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v14.i17.120192